Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1976 Oct;31(4):541–551.

Clonal dominance and the preservation of clonal memory cells mediated by antigen-antibody.

B A Askonas, A J McMichael, M E Roux
PMCID: PMC1445353  PMID: 1086284

Abstract

Selected B-cell clones and their well characterized monoclonal antibody products were used to analyse the role of antibody in clonal dominance and the regulation of memory cell supplies. The experimental design was to permit contact between spleen cells and antigen in vitro, and to administer antibody to DNP prior to or following cell transfers into irradiated recipients. The anti-hapten response was strongly suppressed by the clone's own antibody or higher affinity antibody administered on day 0. Antigen-antibody inhibited memory cell generation. The suppressive effect was temporary, and reversible with time and further antigen and the same clone could be induced to produce antibody again, analysed by isoelectric focusing. We were therefore not dealing with clonal deletion. Change in the source of clonal anti-hapten excluded possible effects of antibody to carrier protein or idiotypic determinants in this system. The timing of antibody administration indicates that clones already triggered in the first 4 days after antigen contact could not be suppressed by antibody. Passive antibody to DNP only suppressed when both B and T cells had been permitted contact with hapten-carrier protein. Alteration of the carrier protein enabled us to study the effect of antigen-antibody on B and T cells separately. B cells binding antigen and antibody to hapten were triggered more efficiently by fresh T cells recognizing the carrier protein than after antigen uptake alone. Antibody to DNP suppressed only when both B and T cells had taken up hapten-protein, suggesting that antigen-antibody acts centrally at the level of both B memory cells and T helper cells. This reversible antigen-antibody blockade appears to favour the preservation of a pool of long-lived memory cells rather than the priming of new clones developing from short lived precursor cells; clonal dominance ensues.

Full text

PDF
541

Images in this article

544Figure 1
on p.544
546Figure 4
on p.546
547Figure 6
on p.547

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Askonas B. A., Cunningham A. J., Kreth H. W., Roelants G. E., Williamson A. R. Amplification of B cell clones forming antibody to the 2,4-dinitrophenyl group. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Dec;2(6):494–498. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Askonas B. A., Schimpl A., Wecker E. The differentiation function of T cell-replacing factor in nu-nu spleen cell cultures. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Mar;4(3):164–169. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Askonas B. A., Williamson A. R. Dominance of a cell clone forming antibody to DNP. Nature. 1972 Aug 11;238(5363):339–341. doi: 10.1038/238339a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Askonas B. A., Williamson A. R. Factors affecting the propagation of a B cell clone forming antibody to the 2,4-dinitrophenyl group. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Dec;2(6):487–493. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Basten A., Miller J. F., Abraham R. Relationship between Fc receptors, antigen-binding sites on T and B cells, and H-2 complex-associated determinants. J Exp Med. 1975 Mar 1;141(3):547–560. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.3.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Basten A., Miller J. F., Warner N. L., Pye J. Specific inactivation of thymus-derived (T) and non-thymus-derived (B) lymphocytes by 125I-labelled antigen. Nat New Biol. 1971 May 26;231(21):104–106. doi: 10.1038/newbio231104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benacerraf B., McDevitt H. O. Histocompatibility-linked immune response genes. Science. 1972 Jan 21;175(4019):273–279. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4019.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bystryn J. C., Siskind G. W., Uhr J. W. Binding of antigen by immunocytes. II. Effect of specific Ig on antigen binding by MOPC 315 cells. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1227–1237. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan P. L., Sinclair N. R. Regulation of the immune response. V. An analysis of the function of the Fc portion of antibody in suppression of an immune response with respect to interaction with components of the lymphoid system. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):967–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cosenza H., Köhler H. Specific suppression of the antibody response by antibodies to receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2701–2705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diener E., Feldmann M. Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. II. A new approach to the phenomenon of immunological tolerance. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):31–43. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dutton R. W. Separate signals for the initiation of proliferation and differentiation in the b cell response to antigen. Transplant Rev. 1975;23:66–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eichmann K. Idiotype suppression. I. Influence of the dose and of the effector functions of anti-idiotypic antibody on the production of an idiotype. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Apr;4(4):296–302. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eichmann K. Idiotype suppression. II. Amplification of a suppressor T cell with anti-idiotypic activity. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Aug;5(8):511–517. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eichmann K., Rajewsky K. Induction of T and B cell immunity by anti-idiotypic antibody. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Oct;5(10):661–666. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830051002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hart D. A., Wang A. L., Pawlak L. L., Nisonoff A. Suppression of idiotypic specificities in adult mice by administration of antiidiotypic antibody. J Exp Med. 1972 Jun 1;135(6):1293–1300. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.6.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haughton G., Mäkelä O. Suppression or augmentation of the antihapten response in mice by antibodies of different specificities. J Exp Med. 1973 Jul 1;138(1):103–116. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Henry C., Jerne N. K. Competition of 19S and 7S antigen receptors in the regulation of the primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):133–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jerne N. K. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann Immunol (Paris) 1974 Jan;125C(1-2):373–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klaus G. G., Willcox H. N. B cell tolerance induced by polymeric antigens. III. Dissociation of antibody formation and memory generation in tolerant mice. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Oct;5(10):699–704. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830051010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kontiainen S., Andersson L. C. Antigen-binding T cells as helper cells. Separation of helper cells by immune rosette formation. J Exp Med. 1975 Oct 1;142(4):1035–1039. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.4.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krause R. M. The search for antibodies with molecular uniformity. Adv Immunol. 1970;12:1–56. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60167-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchell G. F., Humphrey J. H., Wiliamson A. R. Inhibition of secondary anti-hapten responses with the hapten conjugated to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Oct;2(5):460–467. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oudin J., Michel M. Idiotypy of rabbit antibodies. II. Comparison of idiotypy of various kinds of antibodies formed in the same rabbits against Salmonella typhi. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):619–642. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pink J. R., Askonas B. A. Diversity of antibodies to cross-reacting nitrophenyl haptens in inbred mice. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jun;4(6):426–430. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Playfair J. H. The role of antibody in T-cell responses. Clin Exp Immunol. 1974 May;17(1):1–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Raff M. C., Owen J. J., Cooper M. D., Lawton A. R., 3rd, Megson M., Gathings W. E. Differences in susceptibility of mature and immature mouse B lymphocytes to anti-immunoglobulin-induced immunoglobulin suppression in vitro. Possible implications for B-cell tolerance to self. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1052–1064. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roelants G. E., Askonas B. A. Cell cooperation in antibody induction. The susceptibility of helper cells to specific lethal radioactive antigen. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jun;1(3):151–157. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rowley D. A., Fitch F. W., Stuart F. P., Köhler H., Cosenza H. Specific suppression of immune responses. Science. 1973 Sep 21;181(4105):1133–1141. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4105.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sidman C. L., Unanue E. R. Receptor-mediated inactivation of early B lymphocytes. Nature. 1975 Sep 11;257(5522):149–151. doi: 10.1038/257149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stupp Y., Yoshida T., Paul W. E. Determination of antibody-hapten equilibrium constants by an ammonium sulfate precipitation technique. J Immunol. 1969 Sep;103(3):625–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Uhr J. W., Möller G. Regulatory effect of antibody on the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:81–127. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60465-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Werblin T. P., Siskind G. W. Effect of tolerance and immunity on antibody affinity. Transplant Rev. 1972;8:104–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Willcox H. N., McMichael A. J. Radioactive antigen suicide of an anti-DNP (2,4-dinitrophenyl) clone. II. Follow-up of clones relatively resistant to radioactive antigen suicide when initially selected. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5(2):131–139. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Williamson A. R. Antibody isoelectric spectra. Analysis of the heterogeneity of antibody molecules in serum by isoelectric focusing in gel and specific detection with hapten. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Nov;1(5):390–394. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Williamson A. R., Askonas B. A. Senescence of an antibody-forming cell clone. Nature. 1972 Aug 11;238(5363):337–339. doi: 10.1038/238337a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Winfield J. B., Mage R. G., Alexander C. B. Anti-p-azobenzenearsonate antibody of restricted heterogeneity. II. Idiotypes of antibodies produced during a 33-month period. J Immunol. 1973 Mar;110(3):729–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES