Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1977 Apr;32(4):591–599.

Allograft cytotoxicity. Two populations of effector cell detectable by cytolytic and cytostatic assays in vitro.

B Jones, T C Jones, I M Roitt
PMCID: PMC1445481  PMID: 415967

Abstract

Using both the 51Cr-release assay to measure cytolysis and the [125I]UdR incorporation assay to detect cytostasis of target cells, two different effector populations have been identified in C57BL10 mice primed to P815Y cells. As expected, the cytolytic cells were T cells possessing a specific surface receptor. After elimination of T cells with specific antisera and complement the cytostatic effector was found to be an adherent cell which lacked an immunologically specific receptor, and exerted significant activity against the C57BL lymphoma, EL4.

Full text

PDF
591

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbasi K., Festenstein H. Antigenic strength investigated by cell-mediated lympholysis in mice. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jul;3(7):430–435. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berke G., Amos D. B. Mechanism of lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. The LMC cycle and its role in transplantation immunity. Transplant Rev. 1973;17(0):71–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1973.tb00124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunner K. T., Mauel J., Cerottini J. C., Chapuis B. Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51-Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. Immunology. 1968 Feb;14(2):181–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunner K. T., Mauel J., Rudolf H., Chapuis B. Studies of allograft immunity in mice. I. Induction, development and in vitro assay of cellular immunity. Immunology. 1970 Apr;18(4):501–515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerottini J. C., Nordin A. A., Brunner K. T. Specific in vitro cytotoxicity of thymus-derived lymphocytes sensitized to alloantigens. Nature. 1970 Dec 26;228(5278):1308–1309. doi: 10.1038/2281308a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doherty P. C., Zinkernagel R. M. A biological role for the major histocompatibility antigens. Lancet. 1975 Jun 28;1(7922):1406–1409. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans R., Alexander P. Mechanism of immunologically specific killing of tumour cells by macrophages. Nature. 1972 Mar 24;236(5343):168–170. doi: 10.1038/236168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans R., Alexander P. Role of macrophages in tumour immunity. I. Co-operation between macrophages and lymphoid cells in syngeneic tumour immunity. Immunology. 1972 Oct;23(4):615–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giroud J. P., Spector W. G., Willoughby D. A. Bone marrow and lymph node cells in the rejection of skin allografts in mice. Immunology. 1970 Dec;19(6):857–863. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Golstein P., Erik M. D., Svedmyr A. J., Wigzell H. Cells mediating specific in vitro cytotoxicity. I. Detection of receptor-bearing lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1971 Dec 1;134(6):1385–1402. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.6.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Golub E. S. Brain-associated theta antigen: reactivity of rabbit anti-mouse brain with mouse lymphoid cells. Cell Immunol. 1971 Aug;2(4):353–361. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grant C. K., Evans R., Alexander P. Multiple effector roles of lymphocytes in allograft immunity. Cell Immunol. 1973 Jul;8(1):136–146. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(73)90100-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenberg A. H., Shen L., Medley G. Characteristics of the effector cells mediating cytotoxicity against antibody-coated target cells. I. Phagocytic and non-phagocytic effector cell activity against erythrocyte and tumour target cells in a 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay and [125I]IUdR growth inhibition assay. Immunology. 1975 Oct;29(4):719–729. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Julius M. H., Simpson E., Herzenberg L. A. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):645–649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koren H. S., Ax W., Freund-Moelbert E. Morphological observations on the contact-induced lysis of target cells. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jan;3(1):32–37. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lohmann-Matthes M. L., Ziegler F. G., Fischer H. Macrophage cytotoxicity factor. A product of in vitro sensitized thymus-dependent cells. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jan;3(1):56–58. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Newlands E. S. Two methods for detecting different aspects of the immune response to a xenograft in mice. Immunology. 1974 Oct;27(4):543–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pfizenmaier K., Trostmann H., Röllinghoff M., Wagner H. Cell-mediated allograft responses in vitro. VI. Studies on macrophage-mediated cytotoxicity. Immunology. 1975 Dec;29(6):967–976. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenthal A. S., Davie J. M., Rosenstreich D. L., Blake J. T. Depletion of antibody-forming cells and their precursors from complex lymphoid cell populations. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):279–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES