Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1974 Nov;27(5):953–963.

Casein-induced experimental amyloidosis

III. Response to mitogens, allogeneic cells, and graft-versus-host reactions in the murine model

M A Scheinberg, E S Cathcart
PMCID: PMC1445677  PMID: 4154917

Abstract

The functional capacity of lymphoid cells has been determined in amyloid-susceptible CBA/J and amyloid-resistant A/J mice. Following multiple casein injections mitogen responses to phytohaemagglutinin (PHA), concanavalin A (Con-A), pokeweed mitogen (PKW) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were significantly depressed in spleen cell suspensions of the A/J strain. Mitogen responses to PHA, Con-A and PKW were also reduced in casein-treated CBA/J animals, but improved during the active phase of amyloid deposition. The response to LPS was not affected in pre-amyloid and amyloid CBA/J animals. Spleen cells from caseintreated CBA/J mice responded normally to allogeneic cells from BALB/c and A/J mice; on the other hand graft-versus-host reactions in BALB/c mice receiving spleen cells from pre-amyloid and amyloid CBA/J mice were markedly impaired. The marked depression of certain T-cell populations, plus the maintenance of normal B-cell function in the CBA/J mice, suggest that disturbances of immunoregulatory mechanisms may be a critical step in the pathogenesis of experimental amyloid disease.

Full text

PDF
953

Images in this article

956FIG. 1
on p.956

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bach F. H., Voynow N. K. One-way stimulation in mixed leukocyte cultures. Science. 1966 Jul 29;153(3735):545–547. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3735.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bari W. A., Pettengill O. S., Sorenson G. D. Electron microscopy and electron microscopic autoradiography of splenic cell cultures from mice with amyloidosis. Lab Invest. 1969 Mar;20(3):234–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barth W. F., Gordon J. K., Willerson J. T. Amyloidosis induced in mice by Escherichia coli endotoxin. Science. 1968 Nov 8;162(3854):694–695. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3854.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. Graft-versus-host reactions in mice. I. Kinetic and immunogenetic studies of alloantigen-sensitive units of lymphoid tissue. Transplantation. 1971 Feb;11(2):158–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cathcart E. S., Mullarkey M., Cohen A. S. Cellular immunity in casein-induced amyloidosis. Immunology. 1971 Jun;20(6):1001–1008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claesson M. H., Hardt F. Quantitative studies on the decay of lymphoid cells during the development of casein-induced murine amyloidosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1972;80(1):125–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1972.tb00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clerici E., Pierpaoli W., Romussi M. Experimental amyloidodis in immunity. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1965;28(5):806–815. doi: 10.1159/000161835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Druet R. L., Janigan D. T. Experimental amyloidosis. Amyloid induction with a soluble protein antigen in intact, bursectomized and thymectomized chickens. Am J Pathol. 1966 Dec;49(6):1103–1123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Druet R. L., Janigan D. T. Experimental amyloidosis. Rates of induction, lymphocyte depletion and thymic atrophy. Am J Pathol. 1966 Nov;49(5):911–929. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gershon R. K., Cohen P., Hencin R., Liebhaber S. A. Suppressor T cells. J Immunol. 1972 Mar;108(3):586–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KELLUM M. J., SUTHERLAND D. E., ECKERT E., PETERSON R. D., GOOD R. A. WASTING DISEASE, COOMBS-POSITIVITY, AND AMYLOIDOSIS IN RABBITS SUBJECTED TO CENTRAL LYMPHOID TISSUE EXTIRPATION AND IRRADIATION. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1965;27:6–26. doi: 10.1159/000229594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Muckle T. J. Impaired immunity in the etiology of amyloidosis: a speculative review. Isr J Med Sci. 1968 Sep-Oct;4(5):1020–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ram J. S., DeLellis R. A., Glenner G. G. Amyloid. 3. A method for rapid induction of amyloidosis in mice. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968;34(2):201–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ranlov P., Hardt F. In vitro evaluation of cell-mediated immunity in mice: experiments with soluble and cellular antigens in a spleen-thymus cell leucocyte migration test (LMT). Clin Exp Immunol. 1971 Feb;8(2):163–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ranlov P., Jensen E. Homograft reaction in amyloidotic mice. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;67(2):161–164. doi: 10.1111/apm.1966.67.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shirahama T., Cohen A. S. An analysis of the close relationship of lysosomes to early deposits of amyloid. Ultrastructural evidence in experimental mouse amyloidosis. Am J Pathol. 1973 Oct;73(1):97–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stobo J. D., Rosenthal A. S., Paul W. E. Functional heterogeneity of murine lymphoid cells. I. Responsiveness to and surface binding of concanavalin A and phytohemagglutinin. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Willerson J. T., Asofsky R., Barth W. F. Experimental murine amyloid. IV. Amyloidosis and immunoglobulins. J Immunol. 1969 Oct;103(4):741–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES