Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2000 Aug;90(8):1297–1299. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1297

Reliability and validity of disability questions for US Census 2000.

E M Andresen 1, C A Fitch 1, P M McLendon 1, A R Meyers 1
PMCID: PMC1446332  PMID: 10937013

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the validity and proxy reliability of 7 new disability questions from the 2000 US census ("Census 2000"). METHODS: A total of 131 people with disabilities and their proxies from St Louis, Mo, and Massachusetts were interviewed, and responses were compared for concordance. Responses also were compared with responses to questions from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) instrument. RESULTS: Overall, proxies reported more impairment than did people with disabilities, and agreement was low (kappa = 0.24-0.55). Concordance was moderate between the census questions and their BRFSS and ADL counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The Census 2000 questions may not provide an accurate profile of disability in America.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andresen E. M., Fouts B. S., Romeis J. C., Brownson C. A. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):877–884. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90077-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jobe J. B., Mingay D. J. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 1989 Aug;79(8):1053–1055. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.8.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 Dec;31(12):721–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lantz C. A., Nebenzahl E. Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;49(4):431–434. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00571-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Magaziner J., Simonsick E. M., Kashner T. M., Hebel J. R. Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1065–1074. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90076-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weinberger M., Samsa G. P., Schmader K., Greenberg S. M., Carr D. B., Wildman D. S. Comparing proxy and patients' perceptions of patients' functional status: results from an outpatient geriatric clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Jun;40(6):585–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES