Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2000 Aug;90(8):1248–1253. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1248

Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability.

A Todorov 1, C Kirchner 1
PMCID: PMC1446336  PMID: 10937005

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: These studies examined whether differences between self-reports and proxy reports of disabilities reflect proxy response biases or only respondent selection factors. METHODS: The data were from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability (1994-1995, phases 1 and 2). In study 1, reports of disabilities were regressed on respondent status, self vs proxy, and demographic factors. In study 2, the ratios of the proportions of self-reports and proxy reports of disabilities were regressed on independent lay ratings of observability of these disabilities and their "interactional" nature. In study 3, the disability reports for people who differed in respondent status in one phase but self-reported the same disability in the other phase were compared. RESULTS: In study 1, proxies under-reported disabilities for people aged 18 to 64 years but overreported for people 65 years or older. In study 2, the observability and interactional scores accounted for more than 60% of the variance of self and proxy differences in an inverse relationship, study 3 confirmed the basic findings of study 1. CONCLUSIONS: Use of proxies in representative surveys on disability introduces systematic biases, affecting national disability estimates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassett S. S., Magaziner J., Hebel J. R. Reliability of proxy response on mental health indices for aged, community-dwelling women. Psychol Aging. 1990 Mar;5(1):127–132. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.5.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Funder D. C., Dobroth K. M. Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Feb;52(2):409–418. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herjanic B., Reich W. Development of a structured psychiatric interview for children: agreement between child and parent on individual symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1982 Sep;10(3):307–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00912324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mathiowetz N. A., Groves R. M. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports. Am J Public Health. 1985 Jun;75(6):639–644. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rothman M. L., Hedrick S. C., Bulcroft K. A., Hickam D. H., Rubenstein L. Z. The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care. 1991 Feb;29(2):115–124. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199102000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES