Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2000 Nov;90(11):1714–1719. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1714

Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice.

D J Friedman 1, B B Cohen 1, A R Averbach 1, J M Norton 1
PMCID: PMC1446393  PMID: 11076237

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the impact of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) 1997 revised standards for the collection of race and ethnicity data on state health departments, using the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) as the primary example, and we make recommendations for states' implementation of these standards. METHODS: After analyzing the revised OMB standards, existing MDPH data sets were assessed for the impact of the revised standards on data collection, tabulation, analysis, and reporting for state health departments. RESULTS: The revised OMB standards will have an impact on the MDPH and other state health departments. Similarities and differences exist between federal and state health agencies regarding the purpose of data collection, tabulation, analysis, and reporting. These similarities and differences will affect state implementation of the revised OMB standards. CONCLUSIONS: States need to plan for the implementation of the revised OMB standards and to understand the impact of this revision on the collecting and reporting of public health data. The revised OMB standards will introduce added complexities to the collection and analysis of race and ethnicity data, but they will also produce a more nuanced understanding of the relationship of race and ethnicity to the health of the American people.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen B. B., Friedman D. J., Mahan C. M., Lederman R., Munoz D. Ethnicity, maternal risk, and birth weight among Hispanics in Massachusetts, 1987-89. Public Health Rep. 1993 May-Jun;108(3):363–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Friedman D. J., Cohen B. B., Mahan C. M., Lederman R. I., Vezina R. J., Dunn V. H. Maternal ethnicity and birthweight among blacks. Ethn Dis. 1993 Summer;3(3):255–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Martin J. A., Smith B. L., Mathews T. J., Ventura S. J. Births and deaths: preliminary data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999 Oct 5;47(25):1–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thacker S. B., Stroup D. F. Future directions for comprehensive public health surveillance and health information systems in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Sep 1;140(5):383–397. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thacker S. B., Stroup D. F. The future of national public health surveillance in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Fall;2(4):1–3. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199623000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tolson G. C., Barnes J. M., Gay G. A., Kowaleski J. L. The 1989 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports. Vital Health Stat 4. 1991 Jun;(28):1–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES