Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2000 Dec;90(12):1926–1930. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1926

Lessons learned from the tobacco industry's efforts to prevent the passage of a workplace smoking regulation.

C V Mangurian 1, L A Bero 1
PMCID: PMC1446445  PMID: 11111269

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the implementation of tobacco industry strategies to prevent a workplace smoking regulation. METHODS: Tobacco industry internal documents were identified; hearing transcripts for the affiliations, arguments, and positions regarding the regulation of testifiers were coded; and media coverage was analyzed. RESULTS: Tobacco industry strategies sought to increase business participation and economic discussions at public hearings and to promote unfavorable media coverage of the regulation. The percentage of business representatives opposing the regulation grew from 18% (5 to 28) to 57% (13 of 23) between the hearings. Economic arguments opposing the regulation rose from 25% (7 of 28) to 70% (16 of 23). Press coverage was neutral and did not increase during the period of the regulatory hearings. CONCLUSIONS: The tobacco industry was successful in implementing 2 of its 3 strategies but was not able to prevent passage of the comprehensive workplace regulation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chapman S. "Vast sums of money ... to keep the controversy alive"--the 1988 BAT memo. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):236–239. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman S., Borland R., Scollo M., Brownson R. C., Dominello A., Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1018–1023. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman S. Tobacco industry memo reveals passive smoking strategy. BMJ. 1997 May 31;314(7094):1569–1569. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7094.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glantz S. A., Barnes D. E., Bero L., Hanauer P., Slade J. Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):219–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glantz S. A., Parmley W. W. Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):1–12. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Monardi F., Glantz S. A. Are tobacco industry campaign contributions influencing state legislative behavior? Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):918–923. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Patrick E. Maryland restricts workplace smoking. Md Med J. 1995 Oct;44(10):800–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Steenland K. Passive smoking and the risk of heart disease. JAMA. 1992 Jan 1;267(1):94–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES