Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2001 Jan;91(1):55–61. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.55

Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

S A Fox 1, J A Stein 1, R J Sockloskie 1, M G Ory 1
PMCID: PMC1446510  PMID: 11189826

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Older women have the highest breast cancer rates but are underscreened relative to their risk. Racial/ethnic minority women especially have low screening rates, often because of financial constraints. In response, Medicare introduced subsidized biennial mammogram benefits in 1991. This study examined the effect on mammography rates of an intervention that informed women about the Medicare benefit. METHODS: A list frame method of subject selection was used to select random samples of eligible women from the Health Care Financing Administration's master beneficiary file. Women were interviewed by telephone in 1991 (N = 917) before the targeted mailing and in 1993 (N = 922). One control and 2 treatment communities participated. RESULTS: Mammogram use increased significantly among minorities in the treatment groups. Among minorities who received the intervention, Black women were twice as likely (odds ratio = 1.97) and Hispanic women were more than twice as likely (odds ratio = 2.33) to undergo screening relative to their untreated cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted low-cost mailed intervention can help increase screening rates among elderly minority women. The Health Care Financing Administration should promote its benefits aggressively if it expects to reach its target--elderly beneficiaries.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blustein J. Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 27;332(17):1138–1143. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504273321706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breen N., Feuer E. J., Depuy S., Zapka J. The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Public Health Rep. 1997 Sep-Oct;112(5):423–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burg M. A., Lane D. S. Mammography referrals for elderly women: is Medicare reimbursement likely to make a difference? Health Serv Res. 1992 Oct;27(4):505–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler R. N. On behalf of older women. Another reason to protect Medicare and Medicaid. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 21;334(12):794–796. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603213341211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cafferata G. L. Knowledge of their health insurance coverage by the elderly. Med Care. 1984 Sep;22(9):835–847. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell M. K., DeVellis B. M., Strecher V. J., Ammerman A. S., DeVellis R. F., Sandler R. S. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):783–787. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coleman E. A., Feuer E. J. Breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age in 1987-88 and 1991. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Dec 1;117(11):961–966. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dignan M. B., Michielutte R., Jones-Lighty D. D., Bahnson J. Factors influencing the return rate in a direct mail campaign to inform minority women about prevention of cervical cancer. Public Health Rep. 1994 Jul-Aug;109(4):507–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dodd G. D. American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview. Cancer. 1992 Apr 1;69(7 Suppl):1885–1887. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7+<1885::aid-cncr2820691702>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garr D. R., Ornstein S. M., Jenkins R. G., Zemp L. D. The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;9(1):55–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herman C. J., Speroff T., Cebul R. D. Improving compliance with breast cancer screening in older women. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Apr 10;155(7):717–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Janz N. K., Schottenfeld D., Doerr K. M., Selig S. M., Dunn R. L., Strawderman M., Levine P. A. A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1683–1686. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. King E. S., Ross E., Seay J., Balshem A., Rimer B. Mammography interventions for 65- to 74-year-old HMO women. Program effectiveness and predictors of use. J Aging Health. 1995 Nov;7(4):529–551. doi: 10.1177/089826439500700404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LaTour S. A., Friedman B., Hughes E. F. Medicare beneficiary decision making about health insurance. Implications for a voucher system. Med Care. 1986 Jul;24(7):601–614. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCall N., Rice T., Sangl J. Consumer knowledge of Medicare and supplemental health insurance benefits. Health Serv Res. 1986 Feb;20(6 Pt 1):633–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meade C. D., McKinney W. P., Barnas G. P. Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):119–121. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rimer B. K., Resch N., King E., Ross E., Lerman C., Boyce A., Kessler H., Engstrom P. F. Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep. 1992 Jul-Aug;107(4):369–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roetzheim R., Fox S. A., Leake B., Houn F. The influence of risk factors on breast carcinoma screening of Medicare-insured older women. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Cancer. 1996 Dec 15;78(12):2526–2534. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19961215)78:12<2526::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosenstock I. M., Strecher V. J., Becker M. H. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988 Summer;15(2):175–183. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Skinner C. S., Strecher V. J., Hospers H. Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):43–49. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stein J. A., Fox S. A., Murata P. J., Morisky D. E. Mammography usage and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1992 Winter;19(4):447–462. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Strecher V. J. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):107–117. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00128-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strecher V. J., Kreuter M., Den Boer D. J., Kobrin S., Hospers H. J., Skinner C. S. The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. J Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;39(3):262–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Voelker R. Personalized messages invite more mammography. JAMA. 1994 Mar 9;271(10):733–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yancik R., Ries L. G., Yates J. W. Breast cancer in aging women. A population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survival. Cancer. 1989 Mar 1;63(5):976–981. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890301)63:5<976::aid-cncr2820630532>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES