Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2001 Apr;91(4):584–590. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.584

Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study.

J D Allen 1, A M Stoddard 1, J Mays 1, G Sorensen 1
PMCID: PMC1446631  PMID: 11291370

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article reports findings from a peer-delivered intervention designed to increase use of breast and cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Twenty-six worksites were randomly assigned to the intervention or comparison group. The 16-month intervention consisted of group discussions, outreach, and educational campaigns. Data were collected from a random sample of women employees stratified by age (baseline n = 2943; final n = 2747). Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of the intervention on screening behaviors. RESULTS: Relative to comparison worksites, the intervention group experienced greater increases in the percentage of women who reported a recent mammogram (7.2% vs 5.6%), clinical breast examination (5.8% vs 2.1%), and Papanicolaou (Pap) test (4.7% vs 1.9%). After worksite cluster and age strata were controlled for, the observed increase in Pap tests was significantly greater in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.62); however, differences in mammography screening rates (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.44) and clinical breast examination (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.96, 1.49) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention activities produced a modest increase in cervical cancer screening, but they did not accelerate breast cancer screening rates above the observed secular trend.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. D., Sorensen G., Stoddard A. M., Colditz G., Peterson K. Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past. Health Educ Behav. 1998 Aug;25(4):474–488. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson L. M., May D. S. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States? Am J Public Health. 1995 Jun;85(6):840–842. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.6.840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caplan L. S., Coughlin S. S. Worksite breast cancer screening programs: a review. AAOHN J. 1998 Sep;46(9):443–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eng E., Smith J. Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995 Jul;35(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00694741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eng E. The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer. 1993 Aug 1;72(3 Suppl):1071–1077. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3+<1071::aid-cncr2820721322>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher E. B., Jr The results of the COMMIT trial. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):159–160. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fletcher S. W., Black W., Harris R., Rimer B. K., Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644–1656. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fox S. A., Stein J. A. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care. 1991 Nov;29(11):1065–1082. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199111000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris R. P., O'Malley M. S., Fletcher S. W., Knight B. P. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med. 1990 May-Jun;6(3):145–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heaney C. A., Goetzel R. Z. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(4):290–307. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.4.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janz N. K., Schottenfeld D., Doerr K. M., Selig S. M., Dunn R. L., Strawderman M., Levine P. A. A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1683–1686. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koss L. G. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA. 1989 Feb 3;261(5):737–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurtz M. E., Kurtz J. C., Given B., Given C. C. Promotion of breast cancer screening in a work site population. Health Care Women Int. 1994 Jan-Feb;15(1):31–42. doi: 10.1080/07399339409516092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lerman C., Rimer B., Trock B., Balshem A., Engstrom P. F. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):279–290. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marcus A. C., Bastani R., Reardon K., Karlins S., Das I. P., Van Herle M. P., McClatchey M. W., Crane L. A. Proactive screening mammography counseling within the Cancer Information Service: results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;(14):119–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martin L. M., Calle E. E., Wingo P. A., Heath C. W., Jr Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(2):82–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mayer J. A., Jones J. A., Eckhardt L. E., Haliday J., Bartholomew S., Slymen D. J., Hovell M. F. Evaluation of a worksite mammography program. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;9(4):244–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parkinson R. S., Denniston R. W., Baugh T., Dunn J. P., Schwartz T. L. Breast cancer: health education in the workplace. Health Educ Q. 1982 Fall;9(SPEC):61–72. doi: 10.1177/10901981820090s110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paskett E. D., White E., Urban N., Gey G. O., Hornecker J., Meadows S., Sifferman F. R. Implementation and evaluation of a worksite breast self-examination training program. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;339:281–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rakowski W., Ehrich B., Goldstein M. G., Rimer B. K., Pearlman D. N., Clark M. A., Velicer W. F., Woolverton H., 3rd Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 1):748–756. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rimer B. K., Keintz M. K., Kessler H. B., Engstrom P. F., Rosan J. R. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):243–246. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rimer B. K., Ross E., Balshem A., Engstrom P. F. The effect of a comprehensive breast screening program on self-reported mammography use by primary care physicians and women in a health maintenance organization. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Sep-Oct;6(5):443–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Skinner C. S., Strecher V. J., Hospers H. Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):43–49. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Snell J. L., Buck E. L. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):702–707. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stoddard A. M., Rimer B. K., Lane D., Fox S. A., Lipkus I., Luckmann R., Avrunin J. S., Sprachman S., Costanza M., Urban N. Underusers of mammogram screening: stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 1998 May-Jun;27(3):478–487. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suarez L., Roche R. A., Pulley L. V., Weiss N. S., Goldman D., Simpson D. M. Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;13(6):411–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Trock B., Rimer B. K., King E., Balshem A., Cristinzio C. S., Engstrom P. F. Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1993 Mar-Apr;2(2):151–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Urban N., Taplin S. H., Taylor V. M., Peacock S., Anderson G., Conrad D., Etzioni R., White E., Montano D. E., Mahloch J. Community organization to promote breast cancer screening among women ages 50-75. Prev Med. 1995 Sep;24(5):477–484. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vernon S. W., Vogel V. G., Halabi S., Jackson G. L., Lundy R. O., Peters G. N. Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer. 1992 Jan 1;69(1):165–174. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<165::aid-cncr2820690128>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilson M. G., Holman P. B., Hammock A. A comprehensive review of the effects of worksite health promotion on health-related outcomes. Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(6):429–435. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.6.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zapka J. G., Costanza M. E., Harris D. R., Hosmer D., Stoddard A., Barth R., Gaw V. Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention. Prev Med. 1993 Jan;22(1):34–53. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1993.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES