Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2000 Sep;90(9):1377–1381. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.9.1377

The female condom: tool for women's empowerment.

E L Gollub 1
PMCID: PMC1447638  PMID: 10983187

Abstract

International and US experience with the female condom has shown that the device empowers diverse populations of women, helping them negotiate protection with their partners, promoting healthy behaviors, and increasing self-efficacy and sexual confidence and autonomy. This commentary reflects on some approaches that have been taken to study empowerment and makes several observations on the political and scientific initiatives needed to capitalize on this empowerment potential. Women's interest in the female condom indicates a need for more women's barrier methods to be made available. For some women, cultural proscriptions against touching the genitals may create initial hesitancy in trying these methods. But the disposition of regulatory agencies and the attitudes of health care providers has unfortunately exaggerated this reticence, thereby effectively reducing access to these methods. Also, lack of important detail in clinical studies restricts our capacity to introduce the female condom, or similar methods, under optimal conditions. Future trials should prioritize community-based designs and address a range of other critical health and social issues for women. Women's need for HIV/AIDS prevention technologies remains an urgent priority. Both political and scientific efforts are needed to realize the public health potential embodied in the female condom.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aggleton P. Behavior change communication strategies. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Apr;9(2):111–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Artz L., Macaluso M., Brill I., Kelaghan J., Austin H., Fleenor M., Robey L., Hook E. W., 3rd Effectiveness of an intervention promoting the female condom to patients at sexually transmitted disease clinics. Am J Public Health. 2000 Feb;90(2):237–244. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashery R. S., Carlson R. G., Falck R. S., Siegal H. A., Wang J. Female condom use among injection drug- and crack cocaine-using women. Am J Public Health. 1995 May;85(5):736–737. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beeker C., Guenther-Grey C., Raj A. Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Apr;46(7):831–842. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00208-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990 Mar-Apr;21(2):61–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eldridge G. D., St Lawrence J. S., Little C. E., Shelby M. C., Brasfield T. L., Service J. W., Sly K. Evaluation of the HIV risk reduction intervention for women entering inpatient substance abuse treatment. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1 Suppl):62–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farr G., Gabelnick H., Sturgen K., Dorflinger L. Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom. Am J Public Health. 1994 Dec;84(12):1960–1964. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fee E., Krieger N. Understanding AIDS: historical interpretations and the limits of biomedical individualism. Am J Public Health. 1993 Oct;83(10):1477–1486. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.10.1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fontanet A. L., Saba J., Chandelying V., Sakondhavat C., Bhiraleus P., Rugpao S., Chongsomchai C., Kiriwat O., Tovanabutra S., Dally L. Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. AIDS. 1998 Oct 1;12(14):1851–1859. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199814000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gillespie C. C. Women's HIV risk reduction efforts and traditional models of health behavior: a review and critique. Womens Health. 1997 Spring;3(1):1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gollub E. L., Stein Z. A. Commentary: the new female condom--item 1 on a women's AIDS prevention agenda. Am J Public Health. 1993 Apr;83(4):498–500. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.4.498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gollub E. L., Stein Z., el-Sadr W. Short-term acceptability of the female condom among staff and patients at a New York City Hospital. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Jul-Aug;27(4):155–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta G. R., Weiss E. Women's lives and sex: implications for AIDS prevention. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;17(4):399–312. doi: 10.1007/BF01379307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heise L. L., Elias C. Transforming aids prevention to meet women's needs: a focus on developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):931–943. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00165-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holtgrave D. R., Kelly J. A. Preventing HIV/AIDS among high-risk urban women: the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral group intervention. Am J Public Health. 1996 Oct;86(10):1442–1445. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.10.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ickovics J. R., Yoshikawa H. Preventive interventions to reduce heterosexual HIV risk for women: current perspectives, future directions. AIDS. 1998;12 (Suppl A):S197–S208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Magura S., Grossman J. I., Lipton D. S., Siddiqi Q., Shapiro J., Marion I., Amann K. R. Determinants of needle sharing among intravenous drug users. Am J Public Health. 1989 Apr;79(4):459–462. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.4.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nathanson C. A., Becker M. H. The influence of client-provider relationships on teenage women's subsequent use of contraception. Am J Public Health. 1985 Jan;75(1):33–38. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pettifor A. E., Rees H. V., Beksinska M. E., Kleinschmidt I., McIntyre J. In vitro assessment of the structural integrity of the female condom after multiple wash, dry, and re-lubrication cycles. Contraception. 2000 Apr;61(4):271–276. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruzek S. B. Towards a more inclusive model of women's health. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):6–8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Severy L. J., McKillop K. Low-income women's perceptions of family planning service alternatives. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):150-7, 168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shain R. N., Piper J. M., Newton E. R., Perdue S. T., Ramos R., Champion J. D., Guerra F. A. A randomized, controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent sexually transmitted disease among minority women. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 14;340(2):93–100. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shervington D. O. The acceptability of the female condom among low-income African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1993 May;85(5):341–347. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sikkema K. J., Kelly J. A., Winett R. A., Solomon L. J., Cargill V. A., Roffman R. A., McAuliffe T. L., Heckman T. G., Anderson E. A., Wagstaff D. A. Outcomes of a randomized community-level HIV prevention intervention for women living in 18 low-income housing developments. Am J Public Health. 2000 Jan;90(1):57–63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sly D. F., Quadagno D., Harrison D. F., Eberstein I. W., Riehman K., Bailey M. Factors associated with use of the female condom. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Jul-Aug;29(4):181–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stein Z., Saez H., el-Sadr W., Healton C., Mannheimer S., Messeri P., Scimeca M. M., Van Devanter N., Zimmerman R., Betne P. Safer sex strategies for women: the hierarchical model in methadone treatment clinics. J Urban Health. 1999 Mar;76(1):62–72. doi: 10.1007/BF02344462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stein Z., Susser M. Annotation: prevention of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and unwanted pregnancy--testing physical barriers available to women. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):872–874. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sweat M. D., Denison J. A. Reducing HIV incidence in developing countries with structural and environmental interventions. AIDS. 1995;9 (Suppl A):S251–S257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. The NIMH Multisite HIV Prevention Trial: reducing HIV sexual risk behavior. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group. Science. 1998 Jun 19;280(5371):1889–1894. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5371.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Trussell J., Sturgen K., Strickler J., Dominik R. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Mar-Apr;26(2):66–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(3):197–205. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.3.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. du Guerny J., Sjöberg E. Inter-relationship between gender relations and the HIV/AIDS epidemic: some possible considerations for policies and programmes. AIDS. 1993 Aug;7(8):1027–1034. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199308000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. el-Bassel N., Krishnan S. P., Schilling R. F., Witte S., Gilbert L. Acceptability of the female condom among STD clinic patients. AIDS Educ Prev. 1998 Oct;10(5):465–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES