Abstract
In the Whitehall Study, which followed 17139 male civil servants over 33 years, the association between tall stature and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality differed between employment grades. In men without CHD at study entry, the hazard ratio per 15-cm increase in height was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.69, 0.85; P<0.001) for the highest grades, but 0.84 (95% CI=0.69, 1.03; P=.10) for middle and 0.95 (95% CI = 0.75, 1.20; P = .65) for low grades, suggesting that childhood and adult social conditions may interact in their influence on coronary risk.
Early case-control1–3 and cohort studies4–7 reported an inverse association between adult height and coronary heart disease (CHD). Supporting evidence is now available from more recent cohort studies of men,5,8–15 women,16 or both.17–21 Studies also have reported an association with cerebrovascular disease but these findings have been somewhat discrepant.14,20–22 The few studies to explore the influence of height on mortality in participants with prevalent CHD have yielded conflicting results for prognosis after myocardial infarction.23–26
Atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk start in early life,27 and growth-limiting factors have been suggested to contribute to the origins of these risks through early biological changes in the developing vasculature.28–30 But height is also an indicator of childhood social conditions,30–32 and shorter people may have greater cardiovascular vulnerability through continuing social disadvantage.33 Earlier analyses suggested weaker height-related effects with longer follow-up, possibly attributable to selective premature mortality of ill participants with height reduction before study entry.34 We investigated whether the association between height and cardiovascular mortality differs by adult socioeconomic circumstances and compared associations by follow-up period.
METHODS
Between 1967 and 1970, 19 019 male civil servants aged 40 to 69 years completed a standard questionnaire and participated in a physical examination as part of the Whitehall Study of British male civil servants.35–38 Prevalent CHD at baseline was defined by electrocardiogram abnormalities, symptoms, or both.39 The National Health Service Central Register notified us of all deaths that had occurred by the end of 2002. Cause of death was classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8),40 including mortality from CHD (ICD-8 codes 410–414), stroke (ICD-8 codes 430–438), and cardiovascular disease (ICD-8 codes 390–458). Eight percent of deaths were coded using the corresponding codes of the ICD ninth and tenth revisions.41,42
Of the 19 016 participants with known height and age, we excluded 167 for whom there was no follow-up, 44 with unknown cause of death, 863 from the diplomatic service and the British Council for whom employment grading was not comparable, and 803 with missing information on covariates, resulting in a total of 17 139 subjects. We examined linear associations between height and mortality by fitting proportional hazards models separately for participants with and without CHD at baseline. Separate height effects were estimated by employment grade and were tested for interaction using likelihood ratio tests. We examined the effect of height on mortality according to follow-up periods (0–9 y, 10–19 y, 20–29 y, ≥ 30 y) using an interaction term of height by time period.
RESULTS
Height was inversely related to mortality from total cardiovascular disease (CVD) (hazard ratio [HR] associated with each 15-cm increase in height=0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83, 0.95; P<.001). This effect was stronger for CHD mortality (HR=0.81; 95% CI=0.74, 0.88; P<.001) than for stroke (HR=0.91; 95% CI=0.78, 1.08; P=0.28) (Table 1 ▶). Associations were strongest for participants in high employment grades but weaker and nonsignificant for those in middle and low grades. The test for interaction was significant for mortality from CVD (P=.02) but not CHD (P=.09) or stroke (P=.13). Further adjustments had only a small effect on these results. The pattern of results was similar in men with existing CHD (Table 2 ▶), but none of the associations with stroke mortality reached conventional levels of statistical significance.
TABLE 1—
Association of Height and 33-Year Cardiovascular Mortality, by Employment Grade, in Men Without CHD at Baseline: Whitehall Study, 1967–1970
Age-Adjusteda | Multiple-Adjustedb | ||||||
Outcome | Mean Height, cm (SE) | n | Deaths | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P |
Cardiovascular disease | |||||||
All employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 13 885 | 3975 | 0.89 (0.83, 0.95) | <.001 | 0.91 (0.85, 0.98) | .009 |
High employment grades | 176.6 (0.1) | 10 408 | 2784 | 0.84 (0.77, 0.91) | <.001 | 0.87 (0.80, 0.95) | .002 |
Middle employment grades | 174.0 (0.1) | 2 234 | 763 | 0.96 (0.82, 1.13) | .79 | 0.97 (0.83, 1.15) | .73 |
Low employment grades | 173.2 (0.2) | 1 243 | 428 | 1.05 (0.87, 1.26) | .52 | 1.03 (0.85, 1.25) | .75 |
Test for interaction | P = .02 | P = .05 | |||||
Coronary heart disease | |||||||
All employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 13 885 | 2530 | 0.81 (0.74, 0.88) | <.001 | 0.84 (0.77, 0.92) | <.001 |
High employment grades | 176.6 (0.1) | 10 408 | 1781 | 0.77 (0.69, 0.85) | <.001 | 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) | <.001 |
Middle employment grades | 174.0 (0.1) | 2 234 | 478 | 0.84 (0.69, 1.03) | .10 | 0.87 (0.71, 1.07) | .19 |
Low employment grades | 173.2 (0.2) | 1 243 | 271 | 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) | .65 | 0.94 (0.74, 1.19) | .59 |
Test for interaction | P = .09 | P = .21 | |||||
Stroke | |||||||
All employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 13 885 | 738 | 0.91 (0.78, 1.08) | .28 | 0.90 (0.76, 1.06) | .21 |
High employment grades | 176.6 (0.1) | 10 408 | 517 | 0.82 (0.67, 1.01) | .06 | 0.82 (0.67, 1.00) | .05 |
Middle employment grades | 174.0 (0.1) | 2 234 | 146 | 1.18 (0.82, 1.72) | .37 | 1.17 (0.80, 1.70) | .42 |
Low employment grades | 173.2 (0.2) | 1 243 | 75 | 1.06 (0.68, 1.66) | .80 | 1.01 (0.64, 1.60) | .95 |
Test for interaction | P = .13 | P = .16 |
Note. CHD = coronary heart disease; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval.
aAnalysis of all grades combined also is adjusted for grade.
bMultiple adjustment is for age, smoking habit, cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (adjusted for height), glucose intolerance, and diabetes.
TABLE 2—
Association of Height and 33-Year Cardiovascular Mortality, by Employment Grade, in Men With Prevalent CHD at Baseline: Whitehall Study, 1967–1970
Age-Adjusteda | Multiple-Adjustedb | ||||||
Outcome | Mean Height, cm (SE) | N | Deaths | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P |
Cardiovascular disease | |||||||
All employment grades | 174.9 (0.1) | 3254 | 1466 | 0.78 (0.70, 0.87) | <0.001 | 0.80 (0.72, 0.90) | <0.001 |
High employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 2207 | 960 | 0.75 (0.65, 0.86) | <0.001 | 0.75 (0.65, 0.87) | <0.001 |
Middle employment grades | 173.3 (0.3) | 601 | 280 | 0.84 (0.65, 1.09) | 0.19 | 0.93 (0.72, 1.20) | 0.58 |
Low employment grades | 171.8 (0.4) | 446 | 226 | 0.83 (0.64, 1.08) | 0.16 | 0.84 (0.65, 1.10) | 0.21 |
Test for interaction | P = .41 | P = .27 | |||||
Coronary heart disease | |||||||
All employment grades | 174.9 (0.1) | 3254 | 1000 | 0.74 (0.65, 0.85) | <0.001 | 0.77 (0.67, 0.88) | <0.001 |
High employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 2207 | 644 | 0.66 (0.55, 0.79) | <0.001 | 0.67 (0.56, 0.80) | <0.001 |
Middle employment grades | 173.3 (0.3) | 601 | 196 | 0.91 (0.66, 1.23) | 0.53 | 1.00 (0.74, 1.36) | 0.98 |
Low employment grades | 171.8 (0.4) | 446 | 160 | 0.88 (0.65, 1.20) | 0.42 | 0.90 (0.66, 1.24) | 0.52 |
Test for interaction | P = .06 | P = .03 | |||||
Stroke | |||||||
All employment grades | 174.9 (0.1) | 3254 | 214 | 0.76 (0.56, 1.02) | 0.07 | 0.76 (0.56, 1.03) | 0.07 |
High employment grades | 175.9 (0.1) | 2207 | 153 | 0.76 (0.53, 1.09) | 0.13 | 0.74 (0.50, 1.07) | 0.10 |
Middle employment grades | 173.3 (0.3) | 601 | 37 | 0.74 (0.37, 1.49) | 0.40 | 0.80 (0.41, 1.53) | 0.49 |
Low employment grades | 171.8 (0.4) | 446 | 24 | 0.80 (0.36, 1.79) | 0.58 | 0.81 (0.34, 1.91) | 0.63 |
Test for interaction | P = .93 | P = .81 |
Note. CHD = coronary heart disease; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval.
aAnalysis of all grades combined is also adjusted for grade.
bMultiple adjustment is for age, smoking habit, cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (adjusted for height), glucose intolerance, and diabetes.
Associations between height and mortality did not differ significantly between periods of follow-up (all tests for interaction, P > .22, data not shown).
DISCUSSION
Our results indicate that short stature is not only an important influence on the development of CHD in an asymptomatic healthy population but also an influence on the prognosis in men with prevalent CHD. We found no evidence that the adverse effect of height is restricted to participants with differential shrinkage before study entry and selective premature mortality in the early years of follow-up. This finding is supported by studies from Scotland21 and the United States2 where height was assessed at university entry, minimizing potential bias.
The adverse effect of shorter stature on CHD was strongest in those of higher employment grades, in contrast to a study of Finnish men that suggested that those with poor prenatal growth were more vulnerable to the effects of low socioeconomic status on CHD.43 However, the comparability of the 2 populations is questionable. Size at birth and height, although weakly correlated, are markers of growth phases with different determinants and duration and may represent separate influences on cardiovascular risk.10,44
People moving to a higher socioeconomic class are on average taller than the class they leave and shorter than the class they join, resulting in a decrease in mean height in the higher employment grades and narrowing of height inequalities between grades in adulthood.45 In the Whitehall population, there was substantial intergenerational social mobility: children of manual workers became clerical officers and, to a lesser extent, higher-grade civil servants.46 Degree of upward mobility was related to attained adult height.47 Within high employment grades, shorter participants thus represent the upwardly mobile, and their childhood environment and cardiovascular risk differs from the taller participants of continuously high social position. In addition, the relative contribution of early disadvantage to adult cardiovascular risk may be smaller in men in lower employment grades who have increased risk factors and higher absolute mortality.
The generalizability of findings from men of socioeconomic status higher than the general population average—and thus of taller stature and with lower mortality rates—is limited and may underestimate the association between height and CHD. However, our results suggest that the association between height and CHD may be stronger in socially homogenous cohorts.2,8,21,37 Although associations of height with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke may differ,11,22,48 insufficient information on stroke subtypes restricted separate investigation in this study.
Short height is an important influence on the development of CHD in both asymptomatic healthy men and those with evident CHD. Differences in these associations between employment grades show the importance of bringing together studies of the influence of poor growth and socioeconomic position to consider their interactive effects.
Acknowledgments
The original screening of participants in the Whitehall Study was funded by the British Department of Health and Social Security and the Tobacco Research Council. C. Langenberg is supported by a UK Medical Research Council Research Training Fellowship, M. J. Shipley is supported by the British Heart Foundation, G. D. Batty is supported by a Wellcome Trust Advanced Training Fellowship, and M. G. Marmot is supported by a UK Medical Research Council Research Professorship.
Note. The views expressed in this brief are those of the authors and not necessarily those of any of the funding bodies.
Human Participant Protection At the time the Whitehall Study was conducted, there was no requirement to obtain ethical approval for scientific studies of this kind.
Peer Reviewed
Contributors All of the authors contributed to interpreting the analyses and writing the article. C. Langenberg developed the study aim and wrote the initial draft. M. J. Shipley ran the statistical analysis of the data.
References
- 1.Gertler MM, Garn SM, White PD. Young candidates for coronary heart disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1951;147:621–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Paffenbarger RS Jr, Wolf PA, Notkin J, Thorne MC. Chronic disease in former college students. I. Early precursors of fatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1966;83:314–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gertler MM, Woodbury MA, Gottsch LG, White PD, Rusk HA. The candidate for coronary heart disease; discriminating power of biochemical hereditary and anthropometric measurements. J Am Med Assoc. 1959; 170:149–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reed LJ, Love AG. Biometric studies on US army officers: somatological norms in disease. Hum Biol. 1933;5:61–93. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morris JN, Marr JW, Clayton DG. Diet and heart: a postscript. Br Med J. 1977;2(6098):1307–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thorne MC, Wing AL, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Chronic disease in former college students. VII. Early precursors in nonfatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1968;87:520–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paffenbarger RS Jr, Wing AL. Chronic disease in former college students. X. The effects of single and multiple characteristics on risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1969;90:527–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Inequalities in death—specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet. 1984;1(8384):1003–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walker M, Shaper AG, Phillips AN, Cook DG. Short stature, lung function and risk of a heart attack. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18:602–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yarnell JW, Limb ES, Layzell JM, Baker IA. Height: a risk marker for ischaemic heart disease: prospective results from the Caerphilly and Speedwell Heart Disease Studies. Eur Heart J. 1992;13: 1602–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hebert PR, Rich-Edwards JW, Manson JE, et al. Height and incidence of cardiovascular disease in male physicians. Circulation. 1993;88(4 pt 1):1437–1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. Evidence that height is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (the Manitoba Follow-Up Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:398–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Body size and fat distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease among middle-aged and older US men. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:1117–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Adult height, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:1069–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Forsen T, Eriksson J, Qiao Q, Tervahauta M, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J. Short stature and coronary heart disease: a 35-year follow-up of the Finnish cohorts of The Seven Countries Study. J Intern Med. 2000;248:326–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rich-Edwards JW, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Height and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:909–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peck AM, Vagero DH. Adult body height, self perceived health and mortality in the Swedish population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989;43:380–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Watt GC, Hart CL, Hole DJ, Davey Smith G, Gillis CR, Hawthorne VM. Risk factors for cardiorespiratory and all cause mortality in men and women in urban Scotland: 15 year follow up. Scott Med J. 1995;40(4): 108–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davey Smith G, Hart C, Upton M, et al. Height and risk of death among men and women: aetiological implications of associations with cardiorespiratory disease and cancer mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:97–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jousilahti P, Tuomilehto J, Vartiainen E, Eriksson J, Puska P. Relation of adult height to cause-specific and total mortality: a prospective follow-up study of 31,199 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:1112–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCarron P, Okasha M, McEwen J, Davey Smith G. Height in young adulthood and risk of death from cardiorespiratory disease: a prospective study of male former students of Glasgow University, Scotland. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:683–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Song YM, Davey Smith G, Sung J. Adult height and cause-specific mortality: a large prospective study of South Korean men. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158: 479–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rosenberg CR, Shore RE, Pasternack BS. Height and mortality after myocardial infarction. J Community Health. 1995;20:335–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wamala SP, Mittleman MA, Horsten M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K. Short stature and prognosis of coronary heart disease in women. J Intern Med. 1999;245:557–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mukamal KJ, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Kannam JP, Muller JE, Mittleman MA. Height is not associated with long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2001;142:852–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ness AR, Gunnell D, Hughes J, Elwood PC, Davey Smith G, Burr ML. Height, body mass index, and survival in men with coronary disease: follow up of the diet and reinfarction trial (DART). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:218–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP III, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1650–1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robinson SM, Barker DJ. Coronary heart disease: a disorder of growth. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61: 537–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bavdekar A, Yajnik CS, Fall CH, et al. Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old Indian children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both? Diabetes. 1999;48: 2422–2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G, Frankel SJ, Kemp M, Peters TJ. Socio-economic and dietary influences on leg length and trunk length in childhood: a reanalysis of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) survey of diet and health in prewar Britain (1937–39). Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998;12(suppl 1):96–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Batty GD, Leon DA. Socio-economic position and coronary heart disease risk factors in children and young people. Evidence from UK epidemiological studies. Eur J Public Health. 2002;12:263–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wadsworth ME, Hardy RJ, Paul AA, Marshall SF, Cole TJ. Leg and trunk length at 43 years in relation to childhood health, diet and family circumstances; evidence from the 1946 national birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:383–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marmot MG, Wilkinson R, eds. Social Determinants of Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999.
- 34.Leon DA, Davey Smith G, Shipley M, Strachan D. Adult height and mortality in London: early life, socioeconomic confounding, or shrinkage? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:5–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Reid DD, Brett GZ, Hamilton PJ, Jarrett RJ, Keen H, Rose G. Cardiorespiratory disease and diabetes among middle-aged male civil servants. A study of screening and intervention. Lancet. 1974;1(7856):469–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Batty GD, Shipley MJ, Marmot M, Davey Smith G. Physical activity and cause-specific mortality in men with type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance: evidence from the Whitehall study. Diabet Med. 2002;19: 580–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Rossum CT, Shipley MJ, van de Mheen H, Grobbee DE, Marmot MG. Employment grade differences in cause specific mortality. A 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:178–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Marmot MG, Rose G, Shipley M, Hamilton PJ. Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978; 32:244–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hemingway H, Shipley M, Macfarlane P, Marmot M. Impact of socioeconomic status on coronary mortality in people with symptoms, electrocardiographic abnormalities, both or neither: the original Whitehall study 25 year follow up. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:510–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1969.
- 41.International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980.
- 42.International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992.
- 43.Barker DJ, Forsen T, Uutela A, Osmond C, Eriksson JG. Size at birth and resilience to effects of poor living conditions in adult life: longitudinal study. BMJ. 2001;323:1273–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gunnell D, Davey Smith G, McConnachie A, Greenwood R, Upton M, Frankel S. Separating in-utero and postnatal influences on later disease. Lancet. 1999; 354:1526–1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Power C, Manor O, Li L. Are inequalities in height underestimated by adult social position? Effects of changing social structure and height selection in a cohort study. BMJ. 2002;325:131–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kelly MP. White-Collar Proletariat: The Industrial Behaviour of British Civil Servants. London, UK: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul; 1980.
- 47.Marmot M. Social inequalities in mortality: the social environment. In: Wilkinson RG, ed. Class and Health. London, UK: Tavistock Publications; 1986: 21–33.
- 48.Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Leon DA, Sterne JA, Ebrahim S. Secular trends in mortality by stroke subtype in the 20th century: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2002;360:1818–1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]