Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2005 May;170(1):115–126. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.030106

Mutations of a Redundant α-Tubulin Gene Affect Caenorhabditis elegans Early Embryonic Cleavage via MEI-1/Katanin-Dependent and -Independent Pathways

Chenggang Lu 1, Paul E Mains 1,1
PMCID: PMC1449697  PMID: 15781712

Abstract

The C. elegans zygote supports both meiosis and mitosis within a common cytoplasm. The meiotic spindle is small and is located anteriorly, whereas the first mitotic spindle fills the zygote. The C. elegans microtubule-severing complex, katanin, is encoded by the mei-1 and mei-2 genes and is solely required for oocyte meiotic spindle formation; ectopic mitotic katanin activity disrupts mitotic spindles. Here we characterize two mutations that rescue the lethality caused by ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2. Both mutations are gain-of-function alleles of tba-2 α-tubulin. These tba-2 alleles do not prevent MEI-1/MEI-2 microtubule localization but do interfere with its activity. TBA-1 and TBA-2 are redundant for viability, but when katanin activity is limiting, TBA-2 is preferred over TBA-1 by katanin. This is similar to what we previously reported for the β-tubulins. Removing both preferred α- and β-isoforms results in normal development, suggesting that the katanin isoform preferences are not absolute. We conclude that while the C. elegans embryo expresses redundant α- and β-tubulin isoforms, they nevertheless have subtle functional specializations. Finally, we identified a dominant tba-2 allele that disrupts both meiotic and mitotic spindle formation independently of MEI-1/MEI-2 activity. Genetic studies suggest that this tba-2 mutation has a “poisonous” effect on microtubule function.


THE eukaryotic microtubule cytoskeleton is involved in a variety of processes, including cell division, intracellular transport, cell shape maintenance, and cell motility. Despite their diverse cellular functions, microtubule arrays are always polymers of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers. Microtubules are not static structures, and their dynamic properties vary both temporally and spatially to fulfill different functional requirements (Mitchison 1989; Zhai et al. 1996). A critical feature of microtubule dynamics is its ability to switch between growing (polymerizing) and rapidly shrinking (catastrophic) states, a property known as dynamic instability (Mitchison and Kirschner 1984). The dynamic instability of microtubules arises partly from the intrinsic properties of α- and β-tubulins; previous structure-function studies showed that tubulin mutations affect microtubule dynamics both in vivo and in vitro (Anders and Botstein 2001; Dougherty et al. 2001). Microtubule dynamics are also regulated by the presence of stabilizing and destabilizing factors (Davis et al. 1994; Desai and Mitchison 1997). For example, microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), microtubule destabilizers, and microtubule motor proteins were shown to regulate microtubule dynamics in a variety of systems (McNally and Vale 1993; Vasquez et al. 1994; Trinczek et al. 1995; Hunter et al. 2003).

Almost all organisms have multiple α- and β-tubulin isotypes (Ludueña 1998). Within an organism, each cell type normally expresses more than one family member, and these are often modified post-translationally (Ludueña 1998; Xia et al. 2000). Conservation of different isotypes across species suggests natural selection for isotype-specific functions (Wilson and Borisy 1997). Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that different tubulin isotypes affect microtubule dynamics and drug sensitivity (Panda et al. 1994; Derry et al. 1997; Bode et al. 2003). Previous in vivo studies focused mostly on tissue-specific isotypes. For example, Drosophila testis specifically expresses a β2 isotype that is required for proper axoneme organization and function (Hoyle and Raff 1990). Likewise, Caenorhabditis elegans mechanosensory neurons express a specific pair of α- and β-tubulins that confer distinctive protofilament organization and microtubule function (Savage et al. 1989; Fukushige et al. 1999).

The C. elegans embryo expresses pairs of closely related α- and β-tubulins that are largely redundant for normal development (Wright and Hunter 2003; Lu et al. 2004; Phillips et al. 2004). Gain-of-function (gf) mutants of the α-tubulin gene tba-1 and the β-tubulin gene tbb-2 disrupt spindle organization and function, and these mutations likely act by interfering with the function of the α- or β-gene isotypes of both respective tubulins (Wright and Hunter 2003; Ellis et al. 2004; Phillips et al. 2004). Loss-of-function (lf) analysis revealed relatively minor developmental defects associated with diminishing one isotype of each pair, but simultaneous loss of both members of a pair was lethal (Wright and Hunter 2003; Lu et al. 2004; Phillips et al. 2004). These results suggest functional redundancy of α- and β-isotypes, at least at a superficial level. However, we recently demonstrated functional differences between the two embryonic C. elegans β-tubulins, TBB-1 and TBB-2: while either is sufficient for wild-type development, TBB-2 interacts preferentially with MEI-1 and MEI-2, the subunits of the worm katanin microtubule-severing complex (see below) (Lu et al. 2004).

The microtubule-severing complex katanin is an example of a MAP that influences microtubule function and dynamics (McNally and Vale 1993). MEI-1 and MEI-2, which encode the subunits of C. elegans katanin, are specifically required for female meiotic spindle formation. Meiotic spindles form after fertilization of the worm embryo in the same cytoplasm that later supports embryonic mitosis (Albertson 1984; Kemphues et al. 1986; Srayko et al. 2000). Meiotic spindle formation requires MEI-1/MEI-2 microtubule-severing activity, but proper spindle formation during subsequent mitosis requires postmeiotic degradation of MEI-1/MEI-2 (Clark-Maguire and Mains 1994a; Kurz et al. 2002; Furukawa et al. 2003; Pintard et al. 2003; Xu et al. 2003). Ectopic presence of MEI-1/MEI-2-severing activity in mitosis results in small, misoriented spindles (Clark-Maguire and Mains 1994a; Dow and Mains 1998; Srayko et al. 2000), resembling those seen after treating embryos with the microtubule-destabilizing drug nocodazole (Strome and Wood 1983; Hyman and White 1987).

In this work, we report two types of mutations in the tba-2 α-tubulin gene that affect microtubule dynamics. Two alleles result in microtubules that are resistant to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity while a third mutation results in short microtubules independent of MEI-1/MEI-2 function and likely acts as a neomorph that interferes with both tba-2 and tba-1 function. In addition, as with the two superficially redundant β-tubulins described above (Lu et al. 2004), the two redundant α-tubulins interact differentially with MEI-1/MEI-2. Simultaneous loss of any combination of one member of each α- or β-tubulin isotype is viable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nematode strains and culture conditions:

C. elegans (var. Bristol) was cultured under standard conditions (Brenner 1974) and brood analysis was done as described by Mains et al. (1990b). Hatching rates were scored among 500–2500 embryos except when otherwise indicated. For all temperature-sensitive (ts) alleles, hermaphrodites were raised at 15° and shifted to higher temperatures as L4 larvae for brood analyses.

The following genes and alleles were used: LG I, lin-11(n566), unc-13(e1092), unc-29(e1072), mei-1(ct46gf), mei-2(ct98), daf-8(e1393), unc-101(m1), tba-2(sb25, sb27, sb51, sb51sb116, and sb51sb117), unc-59(e261), and the chromosomal deficiency dxDf2; LG II, zyg-9(b244); LG III, tbb-2(sb26, gk129, and gk130), tbb-1(gk207), dpy-17(e164). Descriptions of these genes are found at Wormbase (http://www.wormbase.org). The chromosomal translocation hT2 and chromosome I inversion hInI (Zetka and Rose 1992) were used as balancers. CB4856 was used to provide polymorphisms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mapping (Wicks et al. 2001).

Because most of the tubulin alleles used in this study have either no or minor phenotypes by themselves, strain construction made use of linked morphological markers. However, nearly all morphological markers from the final double or triple mutants were removed from strains to avoid nonspecific background effects. Every strain listed in the tables was DNA sequenced to confirm the continued presence of all intended tubulin alleles. Outcrossing of tbb-1 and tbb-2 deletion alleles from the C. elegans Knockout Consortium was done as previously described (Lu et al. 2004).

Genetic mapping and cloning:

mei-1(ct46gf) results in dominant, ts maternal-effect lethality (Mains et al. 1990a). sb25 and sb27 were selected as suppressors of this mutation in the screen described in Clandinin and Mains (1993). Both sb25 and sb27 were genetically mapped to the region between unc-101 and unc-59 on LG I: mei-1(ct46) unc-29 sb25 males were crossed to unc-101 unc-59. Unc-29 homozygotes were selected from their progeny (unc-29 mei-1(ct46) sb25?/unc-101? unc-59?). Hatching rates were scored at the semirestrictive temperature of mei-1(ct46), 20°, where sb25/sb25, sb25/+, and +/+ can be distinguished (57%, 12%, and 1.5% hatching, respectively). Among those still homozygous for mei-1(ct46), seven segregated unc-101 unc-59, and all of these were heterozygous for sb25. Nine segregated only unc-59, of which five were heterozygous and four were homozygous for sb25, which placed sb25 between unc-101 and unc-59. These data were confirmed by three-factor mapping where unc-101 unc-59 recombinants were collected from unc-101 sb25 +/+ + unc-59 heterozygotes. Each recombinant was crossed with mei-1(ct46) unc-29 sb25 males to test for suppressor homozygosity in the outcross progeny. Of 18 recombinants, 12 lost sb25 during recombination and 6 retained sb25. A three-factor map was generated similarly for sb27 (data not shown).

Within the unc-101 unc-59 region, SNP mapping (Wicks et al. 2001) further defined the location of sb25. unc-101 sb25 unc-59 hermaphrodites were crossed to CB4856 (Hawaiian) males and Unc-101 non-Unc-59 F2 recombinants were allowed to produce a few progeny before crossing with mei-1(ct46) unc-29 sb25 males. For each recombinant, hatching rates were scored from 10 outcross progeny to test for sb25 homozygosity or heterozygosity. The self-progeny produced by each Unc-101 non-Unc-59 recombinant prior to crossing were then examined for the presence of various SNP makers within the region. This gave the map order F08A8:3890 (8) sb25 (7) Y26D4A:7397, where the number of crossovers in each region is denoted within parentheses. This corresponds to four overlapping cosmids or 129 kbp on the physical map. This region includes two predicted candidates, pbs-2 (C47B2.2) and tba-2 (C47B2.3). Sequencing of candidate genomic sequences from sb25 and sb27 was performed as described (Srayko et al. 2000). At least two independent PCR products were sequenced to avoid PCR-generated errors; both mutations resulted in changes within tba-2 only.

The dominant ts maternal-effect lethal mutation sb51 was originally isolated as described by Mitenko et al. (1997). We previously reported a 70% embryonic lethality associated with sb51 homozygotes at 15° (Mitenko et al. 1997). However, further examination of the strain (following further outcrossing) revealed that homozygous sb51 adults showed a fully penetrant sterility at all temperatures. sb51 was SNP mapped using its homozygous sterile phenotype. From sb51 unc-59/Hawaiian heterozygotes, sterile Unc-59 adults were scored for SNP markers, placing sb51 between F08A8:3890 and unc-59 (data not shown). This is the same region where sb25 and sb27 mapped, and tba-2 genomic sequence was amplified from sb51 homozygotes and sequenced as described above.

Isolation of intragenic revertant of tba-2(sb51):

Balanced tba-2(sb51) unc-59/hT2 heterozygotes were mutagenized with ethyl methanesulfonate (Sigma, St. Louis) as described by Brenner (1974). Two to five mutagenized hermaphrodites were transferred to individual plates and allowed to self at 15°. Revertants were isolated by upshifting the F1 larvae to 25° and selecting plates with many viable progeny and fertile Unc-59 adults. Two intragenic revertants, sb116 and sb117, were found among12,500 haploid genomes (the screen was inefficient because crossover suppression by hT2 in the tba-2 unc-59 region is not complete and because so many positive plates contained crossovers rather than the desired revertants). Sequencing of the tba-2 gene in sb116 and sb117 was performed on fertile homozygotes as described above. sb116 was outcrossed three times before further analysis.

Microscopy and immunofluorescence:

L4 or younger animals were upshifted to 25° overnight before fixation or mounting. Living embryos were dissected from gravid hermaphrodites in 25° egg buffer (Edgar and McGhee 1986) and mounted on slides with a 3% agar pad. Nomarski time-lapse recording was performed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with AxioVision software. For immunofluorescence, embryos were freeze cracked and fixed with methanol-acetone as described by Kemphues et al. (1986). Cold-induced microtubule destabilization was performed before freeze crack as described by Hannak et al. (2002). Embryos were expelled from hermaphrodites on a polylysine-coated slide by applying gentle pressure on a coverslip. Slides were then placed on an ice-water-bathed aluminum block for 0, 5, and 8 min (in both of two separate experiments) before fixation and were stained to visualize microtubules and DNA. MEI-1 and MEI-2 antibodies were used as described (Srayko et al. 2000). α-Tubulin localization was determined with the mouse DM 1A α-tubulin monoclonal antibody (Sigma) at 1/200 dilution. Secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) used were FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1/50) and Texas red-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1/100). DNA was visualized with 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride as described by Srayko et al. (2000). Photographs were taken with a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER digital camera and deconvolved using Zeiss AxioVision software.

RNAi:

tbb-1 and tbb-2 RNA interference (RNAi) was performed as described in Lu et al. (2004) using the gene-specific C-terminal and 3′-UTR regions. Similar gene-specific tba-1 and tba-2 RNAi constructs (Phillips et al. 2004) were kindly provided by J. Phillips and B. Bowerman (University of Oregon). RNA was transcribed using the MEGAscript system (Ambion, Austin, TX), and DNA templates were digested with DNase I. The resulting RNAs were purified and annealed for injection as described by A. Fire (ftp.ciwemb.edu/PNF:byName:/FireLabWeb/). Embryos from injected hermaphrodites were dissected for mounting 24 hr postinjection. zyg-9 RNAi was performed using a feeding construct included in the C. elegans chromosome I RNAi feeding library (Fraser et al. 2000).

RESULTS

A dominant mutation disrupts spindle function and interacts with members of the mei-1 pathway:

We first describe a dominant, ts maternal-effect lethal mutation, sb51, which results in dominant defects in both female meiosis and subsequent mitoses. sb51 was isolated from a screen for dominant, ts maternal-effect lethal mutations and was previously assigned the gene name mel-45 (Mitenko et al. 1997). Below, we demonstrate that sb51 corresponds to the gene tba-2, and hereafter we use this designation. Embryos from tba-2(sb51)/+ hermaphrodites are referred to as “mutant embryos.”

We analyzed embryos from heterozygous hermaphrodites grown at the nonpermissive temperature by Nomarski time-lapse video recording and tubulin immunolocalization to visualize spindle morphology. As shown in Figure 1, these embryos showed meiotic (7/11) and mitotic (15/15) spindle defects similar to those caused by mutations that reduce microtubule stability (Matthews et al. 1998; Srayko et al. 2000; Segbert et al. 2003; Wright and Hunter 2003; Ellis et al. 2004). In these embryos, female meiotic spindles are not organized well (Figure 1C), often resulting in abnormal polar-body extrusion (6/11) and multiple maternal pronuclei (5/11) at the stage of pronuclear migration (Figure 1G). The subsequent mitotic spindles are always (15/15) displaced from their normal position on the anterior-posterior axis and have smaller asters (Figure 1, D and H). Adult tba-2(sb51) homozygotes are sterile, and their germlines have no mature oocytes and very few pachytene-stage nuclei (data not shown).

Figure 1.—

Figure 1.—

Meiotic and mitotic phenotypes of embryos from tba-2(sb51)/+ hermaphrodites at 25°. (A–D) α-Tubulin staining was used to visualize spindle structures. (E–H) Nomarski images of pronuclear fusion-stage embryos and embryos in their first mitosis. Meiotic spindle poles of mutant embryos (C) are not as well focused as wild type (A), and meiotic failure often leads to multiple maternal pronuclei (G) as compared to wild type (E). Mutant first mitotic spindles are always aligned on the transverse axis (D and H) and have short aster microtubules (D) as compared to wild type (B and F). Bars: 2 μm in A; 10 μm in H.

The C. elegans mei-1 and mei-2 genes encode the homologs of the microtubule-severing complex katanin and are specifically required for meiotic spindle formation (Srayko et al. 2000). MEI-1/MEI-2 activity is downregulated immediately after meiosis to ensure normal mitotic spindle formation; failure to do so in mel-26 mutants, the gene that normally inhibits mei-1 postmeiotic activity, or mei-1(ct46gf), which is refractory to postmeiotic mel-26 inhibition, results in mitotic spindle defects (Clark-Maguire and Mains 1994a; Dow and Mains 1998; Srayko et al. 2000). tba-2(sb51) genetically interacts with all genes in this pathway (Table 1 and data not shown). sb51 dominantly enhanced both mei-1(ct46gf) and mel-26(ct61) (Table 1, lines 1–5). sb51 also strongly enhanced a mei-2 hypomorphic mutant, ct98, which in contrast to the mutants just mentioned, has meiotic rather than mitotic defects (Table 1, lines 6–7). These results suggest that tba-2(sb51) likely interferes with both meiotic and mitotic spindle formation. Because tba-2(sb51) enhances mutations that either increase or decrease MEI-1/MEI-2 activity, it likely does not affect microtubule severing per se, but may instead affect an element common to both meiotic and mitotic spindles.

TABLE 1.

tba-2(sb51) interacts with themei-1 pathway

Embryonic hatching (%)
Maternal genotype 15° 20°
tba-2(sb51)/+ 44 27
mei-1(ct46gf)/+ 70 31
mei-1(ct46gf) +/+ tba-2(sb51)  0  0
mel-26(ct61)/+ 94  0
mel-26(ct61) +/+ tba-2(sb51)  0.6 ND
mei-2(ct98)/+ ND 97
mei-2(ct98) +/+ tba-2(sb51) ND  5.2

ND, not determined.

sb51 is a tba-2 α-tubulin allele:

sb51 was genetically mapped between two cloned markers, unc-101 and unc-59 (materials and methods). Further SNP mapping (Wicks et al. 2001) identified tba-2 as a likely candidate in the region. Sequencing of the tba-2 genomic DNA in the sb51 mutant worms identified a single missense mutation resulting in a Ser168Tyr amino acid substitution (Figure 2). Therefore, mel-45(sb51) has been renamed tbb-2(sb51).

Figure 2.—

Figure 2.—

Alignment of TBA-1 and TBA-2. TBA-1 and TBA-2 sequences were aligned using the Clustal W program (EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute). Dark shading indicates regions of identity between TBA-1 and TBA-2 sequences. The amino acid sequence change in each TBA-2 allele is indicated.

Since tba-2(sb51) shows dominant spindle defects, we reasoned that it is likely not a lf mutation. A deficiency of the region, dxDf2, shows 68% hatching at the nonpermissive temperature (Table 2), eliminating the possibility that tba-2 is haplo-insufficient. If tba-2(sb51) results in a “poison” gene product, the deleterious effects should be blocked by reducing the gene's expression. Previous RNAi studies revealed redundant roles of the only two α-tubulins that are expressed at significant levels during embryonic development (Baugh et al. 2003; Wright and Hunter 2003; Phillips et al. 2004); we also observed this using gene-specific RNAi (Table 2, lines 1–3). This allowed us to test whether depleting tba-2 expression (which in itself is not lethal) in tba-2(sb51) heterozygous hermaphrodites could rescue the mutant defects in their progeny. Indeed, when we used isotype-specific RNAi to knock down tba-2 expression in tba-2(sb51)/+ mutant hermaphrodites, embryonic lethality was efficiently suppressed. In contrast, RNAi to the other α-tubulin, tba-1, enhanced the lethality (Table 2, lines 4–7). This strongly suggests that sb51 represents a neomorphic tba-2 mutation that acquired a poisonous activity. This activity likely interferes with the function of both α-tubulin isotypes since the sb51 phenotypes resemble those seen when general microtubule function is compromised by either drugs or mutations (Strome and Wood 1983; Hyman and White 1987; Wright and Hunter 2003; Ellis et al. 2004; Phillips et al. 2004).

TABLE 2.

sb51 is a neomorphic allele oftba-2

Embryonic hatching (%)
Maternal genotype 15° 25°
tba-1(RNAi) ND 89
tba-2(RNAi) ND 77
tba-1(RNAi); tba-2(RNAi) ND  0
tba-2(sb51)/+ 44  6.1
tba-2(sb51) Sterile Sterile
tba-2(sb51)/+; tba-1(RNAi) ND  0
tba-2(sb51)/+; tba-2(RNAi) ND 59
tba-2(sb51 sb116)/+ 98 99
tba-2(sb51 sb116) 45a 51a
tba-2(sb51 sb117)/+ 98 98
tba-2(sb51 sb117) 80 27
+/dxDf2 68 68
tba-2(sb51)/dxDf2  0 Sterile
tba-2(sb51)/tba-2(sb51 sb116)  0 Sterile
tba-2(sb51 sb116)/dxDf2 87b Sterile

ND, not determined.

a

N = 200–500. All others are >500.

b

Corrected for the 32% lethality of dxDf2.

Intragenic revertants of tba-2(sb51):

In an effort to determine whether the viability of tba-2(RNAi) reported here and elsewhere (Wright and Hunter 2003; Phillips et al. 2004) approximates a strong lf phenotype, we reverted the dominant ts tba-2(sb51) lethality to look for cis-linked intragenic revertants (materials and methods). Two mutations tightly linked to tba-2(sb51) were isolated. Sequencing confirmed that both represented intragenic revertants: in addition to the parental sb51 lesion, sb51 sb116 contains a Glu22Lys mutation and sb51 sb117 has a Glu69Lys change within the tba-2 coding region (Figure 2). Both alleles completely reverted sb51 dominant lethality and are homozygous fertile (Table 2, lines 8–11). sb51 sb116 was healthier (Table 2, line 9) and was chosen for further analysis.

sb51 sb116 behaves similarly to a chromosomal deficiency that removes the tba-2 region: both sb51/sb51 sb116 and sb51/dxDf2 showed complete sterility at 25°, like sb51 homozygotes (Table 2, lines 12–14). In addition, both sb51 sb116 and dxDf2 showed a slight dominant suppression of sb51: unlike the parental mutation sb51, which is sterile at all temperatures, both trans-heterozygotes were leaky sterile at 15°. The embryos produced by both show 100% lethality (Table 2, lines 13–14). This indicates that the sb51 phenotype depends on the dosage of the defective product. Although sb51 sb116 is genetically similar to dxDf2, the revertant is likely not a genetic null of tba-2 because sb51 sb116/dxDf2 is more severe than tba-2(RNAi) (Table 2, lines 2 and 15) and sb51 sb116 homozygotes have lower viability than tba-2(RNAi) animals (Table 2, lines 2 and 9), which, as we argue below, likely represents the null phenotype. This suggests, in view of the previous results, that sb51 sb116 may retain some residual sb51 poisonous activity, which is dosage dependent.

sb25 and sb27, two alleles of tba-2, are suppressors of ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 expression:

In an independent screen, we identified mutations of tba-2 that affect microtubules in a different manner than does sb51. Mutants that show ectopic MEI-1 and MEI-2 expression during mitotic cleavages are defective in mitotic spindle formation (Clark-Maguire and Mains 1994a; Srayko et al. 2000). In a previous screen to identify genes that function in this pathway, we isolated three mutants that rescued the defects caused by ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 expression (Clandinin and Mains 1993). One of them, sb26, was found to be a missense allele of the tbb-2 β-tubulin gene (Lu et al. 2004). The other two, sb25 and sb27, like sb26, lack visible phenotypes of their own. Both semidominantly suppressed the embryonic lethality caused by ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 expression of mei-1(ct46gf) (Table 3, lines 1–7) and mel-26 (data not shown). In addition, both sb25 and sb27 enhanced the hypomorphic mutant mei-2(ct98), which results in reduced meiotic MEI-1/MEI-2 activity (Table 3, lines 8–10) (Mains et al. 1990a; Srayko et al. 2000). Therefore, both suppressors behave as if they inhibit the general function of MEI-1/MEI-2 in both meiosis and mitosis. Neither sb25 nor sb27 affected the ectopic localization of the MEI-1/MEI-2 complex (Figure 3), suggesting that they likely interfere with MEI-1/MEI-2 activity rather than with its ability to localize to microtubules. All of these properties of sb25 and sb27 also resemble tbb-2(sb26) (Lu et al. 2004), suggesting that they likely function at a similar step of the pathway as does tbb-2(sb26).

TABLE 3.

Genetics oftba-2(sb25) andtba-2(sb27)

Embryonic hatching
(%)
Maternal genotype 15° 20° 25°
mei-1(ct46) 23  1.5   0
tba-2(sb25) 96 ND 100
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25)/mei-1(ct46) + ND 12   0
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25) 75 57  15
tba-2(sb27) 97 ND  98
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb27)/mei-1(ct46) + ND 15   0
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb27) 66 55  12
mei-2(ct98) 96 ND  74
mei-2(ct98) tba-2(sb25) 98 ND  43
mei-2(ct98) tba-2(sb27) 10 ND   0.9
tbb-2(sb26) 98 ND  97
tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) 88 (2)a ND  44 (11)a
tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) 94 ND  99
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) ND 99  91
mei-1(ct46); tbb-2(sb26) 96b 92b  67b
zgy-9(b244) ND 97   0
tba-2(sb25); zgy-9(b244) ND 98   0
tba-2(sb27); zgy-9(b244) ND 93   0

ND, not determined.

a

Percentage of males among survivors. In wild type, only 0.2% of self-progeny are male (Hodgkin and Brenner 1977).

b

Data taken from Lu et al. (2004).

Figure 3.—

Figure 3.—

Mislocalization of MEI-1 and MEI-2 to mitotic centrosomes and chromosomes in mei-1(ct46); tba-2(sb25) and mei-1(ct46); tba-2(sb27) double-mutant embryos. Indirect immunofluorescence images of anti-MEI-1 staining show ectopic MEI-1 expression in (A) mei-1(ct46gf), (B) mei-1(ct46gf); tba-2(sb25), and (C) mei-1(ct46gf); tba-2(sb27). Similar results were seen with anti-MEI-2 staining in (D) mei-1(ct46gf), (E) mei-1(ct46gf); tba-2(sb25), and (F) mei-1(ct46gf); tba-2(sb27). Both MEI-1 and MEI-2 localize to mitotic spindle microtubules, centrosomes (open arrowheads), and chromosomes (open arrowheads). The photographs were digitally deconvolved. Bar, 10 μm.

Both sb25 and sb27 map to the right arm of LG I between unc-101 and unc-59. Further SNP mapping (Wicks et al. 2001) indicated that the gene(s) harboring these mutations is on a single cosmid in which the α-tubulin gene tba-2 resides (materials and methods). Sequencing tba-2 genomic DNA in sb25 and sb27 mutants revealed, respectively, Glu277Lys and Glu194Lys missense mutations in tba-2 (Figure 2).

Both tba-2 alleles genetically act as dominant inhibitors of MEI-1/MEI-2 activity, suggesting that they were likely gf rather than lf alleles of the α-tubulin gene. Consistent with this, removing one copy of tba-2 with the chromosomal deficiency dxDf2 did not suppress but instead slightly enhanced mei-1(ct46gf) (Table 4, lines 1–2), indicating that suppression did not result from a loss of gene activity. In addition, sb25 and sb27 hemizygotes suppressed mei-1(ct46gf) slightly less than did their homozygotes (Table 4, lines 3–8). This is again similar to what we found with tbb-2(sb26), a gf allele of tbb-2 (Lu et al. 2004).

TABLE 4.

sb25 andsb27 are both gain-of-function suppressors ofmei-1(ct46)

Maternal genotype Embryonic hatching
at 20° (%)
mei-1(ct46)/+ 27
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(+)/+ dxDf2 12a
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25)/+ + 44
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25)/+ tba-2(sb25) 90
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25)/+ dxDf2 78a
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb27)/+ + 42
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb27)/+ tba-2(sb27) 78
mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb27)/+ dxDf2 70a
a

Corrected for the 32% lethality of dxDf2.

It is possible that sb25 and sb27 result in the general stabilization of microtubules. However, we previously reported that tbb-2(sb26) caused microtubules to behave as if they are specifically resistant to MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin activity (Lu et al. 2004). Similar to tbb-2(sb26), neither tba-2(sb25) nor tba-2(sb27) suppressed a zyg-9 ts allele (Kemphues et al. 1986) that gives rise to less stable microtubules (Table 3, lines 16–18), suggesting that neither tba-2 allele results in generally more stable microtubules. The possibility that the tba-2 alleles generally stabilize microtubules was also tested using an in vivo cold-induced microtubule-destabilizing assay (Hannak et al. 2002). In this case, we used the double mutant tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26), which has a much stronger effect on microtubules than either of the single mutants (see below). When embryos were placed in a cold environment for 5 min, tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) embryos appeared to have similar or fewer numbers of microtubule bundles as compared to wild-type embryos treated in parallel (Figure 4). When tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) and wild-type embryos were placed at 0° for 8 min or longer, all embryos lacked visible microtubule asters. Therefore, tba-2(sb25) and tba-2(sb27) likely result in microtubules specifically resistant to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity without causing obvious effects on general microtubule dynamics.

Figure 4.—

Figure 4.—

tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) and wild-type microtubules behave similarly in a cold environment. Representative one-cell embryos of wild-type (A, C, and E) and tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) (B, D, and F) embryos (n > 20 for both genotypes) were placed on ice for 0 (A and B), 5 (C and D), and 8 (E and F) min, fixed, and stained with anti-α-tubulin antibody to visualize spindle microtubule structure. Bar, 10 μm.

Microtubules resistant to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity cause meiotic defects:

Microtubules showing complete resistance to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity should result in meiotic failure characteristic of mei-1 or mei-2 null alleles, yet the tbb-2 and tba-2 alleles selected as suppressors of ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 activity have no apparent phenotype on their own. Therefore, each likely renders only partial resistance. We speculated that the effect of combining an α-tubulin and the β-tubulin suppressor mutation would be additive, perhaps resulting in meiotic defects similar to those of mei-1/mei-2 lf mutants. Indeed, tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) double-mutant adults are healthy with normal brood size but displayed only 44% hatching at 25° (Table 3, line 12). As shown in Figure 5, a tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) embryo showed normal pronuclear fusion and normal first mitotic cleavage. However, abnormally large polar bodies often (4/9) formed at the anterior, indicative of meiotic defects (Figure 5, D–F), and such embryos would likely die due to the resulting aneuploidy. Among the survivors at 25°, there was also a high incident of male (Him) phenotype (Table 3, line 12), which is also indicative of meiotic failure leading to nondisjunction that gives rise to XO males (Hodgkin and Brenner 1977). The polar body and Him phenotypes are typical of mei-1 and mei-2 hypomorphs, which have minor meiotic spindle defects (Mains et al. 1990a). Indeed, meiotic spindles of tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) embryos show abnormal morphologies comparable to meiotic spindles from the mei-2 hypomorphic allele ct98 (Figure 6, A–C). However, the meiotic spindle defects are not as severe as those seen in the mei-1(ct46ct101) null mutant, which has a cloud of microtubules that does not coalesce into a spindle (Figure 6D). Animals doubly mutant for tbb-2(sb26) and the other tba-2 mutations, sb25, did not have obvious meiotic defects like those seen in tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) (Table 3, line 13). Nevertheless, they also behaved as if their microtubules were more resistant to katanin activity than the single mutants since the mei-1(ct46gf) lethality was almost completely suppressed, giving rise to 91% hatching at the restrictive temperature (Table 3, line 14), as compared to 15% hatching for mei-1(ct46) tba-2(sb25) and 67% for mei-1(ct46); tbb-2(sb26) (Table 3, lines 4 and 15).

Figure 5.—

Figure 5.—

Meiotic phenotype of the tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) double mutant. Shown are Nomarski images of the first cell division of a wild-type (A–C) and of a tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) embryo (D–F) at 25°. In tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) embryos, female and male pronuclei migrate normally to the center of the embryo and rotate 90° (D); then the first mitotic spindle is aligned longitudinally (E), and the cell divides asymmetrically into a larger anterior daughter and a smaller posterior daughter (F). All of these features resemble those of wild type (A–C). However, tba-2(sb25); tbb-2(sb26) embryos often have enlarged polar bodies (open arrow; compare D–F to A–C), indicating meiotic spindle defects. Bar, 10 μm.

Figure 6.—

Figure 6.—

Meiotic spindle defects of tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) mutant embryos. Anti-α-tubulin staining of metaphase or early anaphase meiotic spindles of (A) wild-type, (B) tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26), (C) mei-2(ct98), and (D) mei-1(ct46ct101) embryos are shown to reveal morphological defects of the mutant spindles. Bar, 2 μm.

TBA-2 and TBA-1 interact differently with MEI-1/MEI-2:

We previously reported that mei-1/mei-2 showed different genetic interactions with null alleles of the two redundant β-tubulin isotypes, tbb-1 and tbb-2, suggesting that microtubules containing the TBB-2 isotype are preferred by the MEI-1/MEI-2 microtubule-severing complex (Lu et al. 2004). We asked whether the TBA-1 and TBA-2 isotypes are also differentially required for the activity of MEI-1/MEI-2. Wild-type meiotic embryos contain excess MEI-1/MEI-2 activity (Clandinin and Mains 1993), which can mask subtle functional differences among tubulin isotypes. Therefore, we used the partial lf allele mei-2(ct98) to lower (but not eliminate) meiotic MEI-1/MEI-2 activity and examined the effects of depleting either TBA-1 or TBA-2 by gene-specific RNAi. Depleting TBA-2 in mei-2(ct98) strongly enhanced its meiotic lethality, while depletion of TBA-1 had only a small effect (Table 5, lines 1–5, and Table 6). This suggests that the activity of MEI-1/MEI-2 prefers microtubules containing the TBA-2 isotype. Therefore, MEI-1/MEI-2 appears to interact differentially with superficially very similar α-tubulin isotypes.

TABLE 5.

MEI-1/MEI-2 prefers TBA-2

Maternal genotype Embryonic hatching
at 25° (%)
tba-1(RNAi) 89a
tba-2(RNAi) 77a
mei-2(ct98) 71
mei-2(ct98); tba-1(RNAi) 55
mei-2(ct98); tba-2(RNAi)  8
tbb-2(gk129) 65
tba-2(RNAi); tbb-2(gk129) 63
tbb-2(sb26) 97
tba-1(RNAi); tbb-2(sb26) 87
tba-2(RNAi); tbb-2(sb26) 65
tbb-1(gk207) 94
tba-1(RNAi); tbb-1(gk207) 92
tba-2(RNAi); tbb-1(gk207) 81
tba-1(RNAi); tbb-2(gk129) 60
a

Numbers taken from Table 2. Double-stranded RNAs were used at 0.5 mg/ml for tba-1 and tba-2 throughout this table. These concentrations of double-stranded RNA resulted in complete lethality for the tba-1 and tba-2 double RNAi (Table 2), indicating that each must eliminate a substantial amount of its respective product.

TABLE 6.

tba-1 andtba-2 RNAi effects at different concentrations

Embryonic hatching at 25° (%)
tba-1 RNAi
tba-2 RNAi
tba-1 and
tba-2 RNAi:

dsRNA concentration (mg/ml) N2 mei-2(ct98) N2 mei-2(ct98) N2
2.5 91 55 89  0.4  0
0.5 89 55 77  8  0
0.25 96 69 84 17  0.6
0.025 96 66 91 69 48

It is formally possible that the differential effects that we observed above resulted from the unequal efficiency of tba-1 and tbb-2 RNAi. The high sequence similarity between these two genes makes generation of isotype-specific antibodies impractical for examining the effects of RNAi on gene expression. We reasoned that if the different effects seen in the mei-2(ct98) background reflect differences of RNAi-mediated depletion of gene expression, then these effects should vary when concentrations of the double-stranded RNA change. However, as shown in Table 6, the differential effects of tba-1 and tba-2 RNAi remained consistent when RNA concentrations changed over a 10-fold range: the enhancement of mei-2(ct98) lethality by tba-2(RNAi) was dose dependent, while little or no effect was seen for tba-1 RNAi even at the highest concentration. The observation that the double RNAi showed almost complete lethality at a lower dose (0.5 mg/ml) indicates that each single RNAi works efficiently at this lower concentration. Therefore, when the highest concentration (2.5 mg/ml) was used in the RNAi experiments, tba-1 and tba-2 RNAi phenotypes likely closely approximated null phenotypes, supporting our suggestion for the TBA-2 isotype preference by MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin.

The viability of tba-2(RNAi) and tba-2(sb51sb116) indicates that the preference of MEI-1/MEI-2 for TBA-2 is not absolute (otherwise they would mimic the mei-1(null) phenotype), and so microtubules containing only TBA-1 must be a usable substrate when MEI-1/MEI-2 is not limiting. This was also true for microtubules containing only TBB-1, which can serve as a MEI-1/MEI-2 substrate when the preferred β-isotype, TBB-2, is eliminated by either mutation or RNAi (Lu et al. 2004) in an otherwise wild-type background. We next asked if removal of both preferred isotypes, TBA-2 (by RNAi) and TBB-2 (using a deletion mutant), resulted in microtubules that are resistant to wild-type levels of MEI-1/MEI-2 activity. However, in the absence of both of the two preferred tubulin isotypes, TBB-2 and TBA-2, embryos developed relatively normally, without showing increased lethality relative to the single depletions or any obvious meiotic spindle defects (Table 5, lines 2, 6–7). This suggests that the pair is not absolutely required when MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin is not limiting. We also eliminated the preferred tba-2 isotype in the presence of the resistant tbb-2(sb26) allele, but again found at best a modest effect (Table 5, lines 8–10).

To determine if there is a requirement for one particular type of α/β heterodimer for viability, we used tbb-1 and tbb-2 deletion alleles in combination with tba-1(RNAi) and tba-2(RNAi) to deplete the other pairwise α- and β-tubulin combinations. As shown in Table 5, we found that removing any combinations of α- and β-isotypes did not decrease hatching rates and resulted in relatively normal development. No obvious meiotic defects were observed (Table 5, lines 12–14). Therefore, the presence of one α- and one β-isotype, regardless of which of the two, suffices for development.

DISCUSSION

C. elegans female meiosis and the subsequent first mitosis require very distinctive types of spindle organization despite the fact that both occur in a common cytoplasm within a short period of time (Albertson 1984; Kemphues et al. 1986). Therefore, the microtubule cytoskeleton must be precisely regulated during these divisions. While the MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin microtubule-severing activity is essential for meiotic spindle organization, its ectopic presence in subsequent mitotic divisions results in displacement of the mitotic spindle and shorter astral microtubules (Clark-Maguire and Mains 1994a; Srayko et al. 2000). Factors like MEI-1 and MEI-2 must adjust spindle microtubule dynamics or function to achieve different morphological and functional requirements in meiosis and mitosis. Microtubule-stabilizing factors, such as ZYG-9, also play a role in the formation of both spindles, and ZYG-9 activity seems to be counterbalanced by mei-1 and mei-2 in meiosis (Matthews et al. 1998; Bellanger and Gonczy 2003; Srayko et al. 2003).

A tba-2 mutation destabilizes microtubules:

Tubulin mutations that affect the general dynamic properties of microtubules are expected to show spindle defects in both meiosis and mitosis. Here we have shown that the tba-2 α-tubulin mutation sb51 results in dominant, ts maternal-effect lethality due to defective spindle formation in both meiosis and mitosis. tba-2(sb51) mitotic defects resemble those of embryos treated with microtubule-depolymerizing drugs (Strome and Wood 1983; Hyman and White 1987), suggesting that sb51 inhibits microtubule assembly and/or stability. Mutations that result in ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 activity during mitosis also result in similar phenotypes, and indeed, such mutations enhanced tba-2(sb51) lethality (Table 2). However, the tba-2(sb51) mitotic spindle defects do not depend on MEI-1/MEI-2 activity since there is no ectopic MEI-1/MEI-2 present in mitosis in tba-2(sb51) embryos (data not shown) and sb51 dominant lethality is not affected by tbb-2(sb26), which results in microtubules less sensitive to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity (data not shown). In addition, tba-2(sb51) homozygotes are sterile due to insufficient germline mitotic proliferation (data not shown), a process also independent of MEI-1 and MEI-2. The enhancement of embryonic lethality between tba-2(sb51) and mei-1 pathway mutants likely reflects synergism between mutations that independently weaken the mitotic spindle. tba-2(sb51) also enhances a mei-2 hypomorphic mutation that limits the normal meiotic microtubule-severing activity of MEI-1/MEI-2. In this background, microtubules would be expected to be more stable due to decreased microtubule severing, indicating that the mei-2/tba-2(sb51) genetic interaction likely reflects synergism between spindles that are defective in different ways.

The simplest explanation of the tba-2(sb51) dominant phenotype is that it acts as a neomorphic poison that inhibits microtubule assembly and/or function. Since RNAi (Table 2) (Wright and Hunter 2003; Phillips et al. 2004) and intragenic lf revertants (Table 2) demonstrate that tba-2 is nonessential (due to redundancy with tba-1), sb51 likely acts by inhibiting both tba-1 and tba-2 function. tba-2(sb51) might form heterodimers with the β-tubulin isotypes that cannot either assemble or result in unstable microtubules. Consistent with the neomorphic poisonous effect of tba-2(sb51), tba-2(RNAi) rescued sb51 dominant lethality while tba-1(RNAi) enhanced it. The sb51 lesion Ser168Tyr is located at the edge of the T5 loop that makes contact with the ribose of GTP (we et al. 2001). Therefore, TBA-2(sb51) likely has an altered conformation in the GTP-bound form, which may dominantly disrupt microtubule dynamics when incorporated into tubulin heterodimers or microtubules.

Most of the poisonous effect of tba-2(sb51) was suppressed by the intragenic revertant sb51 sb116. sb51 sb116 has a second-site Glu22Lys mutation in TBA-2 (Figure 2), a region suggested to affect interaction with the phosphates of the α-tubulin bound nonexchangeable GTP (Nogales et al. 1998). sb51 sb116 most likely results in a subunit that is unstable or that cannot interact with β-tubulin, and so it would also no longer antagonize TBA-1. A TBA-2-specific antibody would test this hypothesis. However, due to the extremely high amino acid sequence conservation between TBA-1 and TBA-2, which are 98.5% identical, raising an isotype-specific antibody to follow the fate of the mutant protein is not feasible. sb51 sb117 has a second-site Glu69Lys mutation that likely also affects TBA-2 interactions with phosphates of GTP and so may exert an effect similar, but weaker, to that seen for sb51 sb116.

α- and β-tubulin mutations with phenotypes similar to tba-2(sb51) have also been identified in C. elegans by other groups. These mutations are thought to exert their effects through different mechanisms. TBB-2(or362) is a Gly-to-Glu mutation at position 141 within one of the GTP-binding domains, and the mutant protein is expressed at a very low level. However, this conditionally semidominant mutation, like tba-2(sb51)/+, poisons spindle microtubules and causes strong spindle defects (Ellis et al. 2004). TBB-2(qt1) has a Glu-to-Lys change at position 198 and appears to increase microtubule stability when incorporated (Wright and Hunter 2003). TBB-2(t1623) has a Val-to-Met change at position 313 (Wright and Hunter 2003) and has decreased TBB-2 levels that are still sufficient for incorporation into the spindle. The α-tubulin mutant TBA-1(or346) has a Ser-to-Phe change at position 379 (Phillips et al. 2004) and behaves as a conditionally semidominant poison mutation. Both TBB-2(t1623) and TBA-1(or346) likely affect spindle formation by disrupting microtubule dynamics or its interactions with MAPs.

Mutations in tba-2 increase microtubule resistance to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity:

MEI-1/MEI-2 microtubule severing must require specific interactions with tubulins, and we have identified mutant tubulins that appear to interfere with this interaction. We previously demonstrated that the β-tubulin mutation tbb-2(sb26) partially inhibited MEI-1/MEI-2 activity, likely at the level of severing since localization to microtubules was not affected. This allele is a point mutation in the carboxyl terminus of the TBB-2 β-tubulin (Lu et al. 2004). In contrast to the rest of the protein, the carboxyl termini of tubulins generally show low sequence conservation and are the most obvious distinguishing features among isotypes (although this is not true for tba-1 and tba-2; Figure 2). This region was previously shown to be required for in vitro katanin severing (McNally and Vale 1993). Here we show that the sb25 and sb27 mutations of tba-2 similarly result in partial resistance to MEI-1/MEI-2 function, again without affecting MEI-1/MEI-2 localization to microtubules (Figure 3). Unlike tbb-2(sb26), their lesions are well outside the carboxyl terminus, implicating other regions of the protein for MEI-1/MEI-2 interactions. Interestingly, similar to the amino acid substitution in TBB-2(sb26), both sb25 and sb27 resulted in Glu-to-Lys changes (at residues 277 and 194, respectively; Figure 2), decreasing the acidity of the protein. Although the two mutations are not close to one another in the protein sequence, they both fall into a region in the 3D structure where strong lateral contacts between protofilaments are made (Nogales et al. 1998). Thus, the tba-2 mutations could act by increasing the general stability of the microtubules rather than by altering specific interactions with MEI-1/MEI-2. However, this is not likely since neither tba-2(sb25) nor tba-2(sb27) genetically interacted with zyg-9(ts) (Table 3) or zyg-9(RNAi) (data not shown), which encodes a MAP that stabilizes microtubules (Matthews et al. 1998). In addition, this model might predict that microtubules containing these tba-2 mutations would be more cold stable (Hannak et al. 2002). However, the cold stability of microtubules in early tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) embryos was not altered (Figure 4), suggesting that these mutations specifically affect the interactions between katanin and microtubules. Furthermore, tba-2(sb27); tbb-2(sb26) embryos displayed defects only in meiosis where MEI-1/MEI-2 activity is normally present (Figures 5 and 6). Therefore, these genetic studies strongly suggest that the three tubulin mutations, sb25, sb26, and sb27, specifically disrupt katanin-microtubule interactions required for severing rather than general microtubule stability, hence rendering microtubules less sensitive to katanin activity.

Microtubules containing any one of the tubulin mutations are not completely resistance to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity since none of the mutants alone showed defects in meiosis, where katanin activity is essential (Mains et al. 1990a; Srayko et al. 2000). Meiotic phenotypes were seen only when tba-2 and tbb-2 alleles were combined (Table 3 and Figure 5). The three mutations differ individually in the degree of their resulting resistance to MEI-1/MEI-2 activity. sb27 showed the strongest enhancement of mei-2(lf), implying that it confers on microtubules the strongest resistance among the three. However, sb27 is not the best suppressor of mei-1(ct46gf) (Table 3). This is likely due to the mei-1(ct46gf) mutation, which in addition to resulting in mitotic persistence of the mutant product, reduces MEI-1 activity during meiosis to some extent (but not to lethal levels; data not shown). Hence, strong suppression of the ectopic mitotic activity of mei-1(ct46gf) by sb27 would be masked by the corresponding increased lethality resulting from its enhancement of the mei-1(ct46gf) meiotic defects (data not shown).

Redundant tubulin isotypes differ in their interactions with MEI-1/MEI-2:

Microarray data indicate that the early C. elegans embryo expresses a pair of α- and a pair of β-tubulin isotypes (Baugh et al. 2003). In both cases, these are the only isotypes expressed at significant levels, and members of each pair are expressed at similar levels. Using RNAi and null mutants, we and others have demonstrated that members of each pair are redundant for viability (Lu et al. 2004; Phillips et al. 2004). Wright and Hunter (2003) showed previously that simultaneous depletion TBA-2 and TBB-2 expression resulted in high (although not complete) lethality while we observed a lower level of lethality (Table 5). However, this difference was mainly due to the high embryonic lethality (90%) that the authors observed with the strains containing the tbb-2 deletion allele. However, we found both tbb-2 deletion alleles were much healthier after outcrossing (Lu et al. 2004), and these outcrossed strains were used in the work reported here.

Using the sensitized genetic background of mei-2(ct98), which lowers but does not eliminate MEI-1/MEI-2 activity in meiosis, we showed that one member of each isotypic pair, TBB-2 and TBA-2, is preferred for katanin activity (Tables 5 and 6 and Lu et al. 2004). Simultaneous elimination of tba-2 and tbb-2 resulted 63% hatching (Table 5) with no obvious meiotic defects. Thus, we have shown that the worm encodes both α- and β-tubulin isotypes that are specialized for interactions with MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin activity, although those specializations are not absolute. Thus although tubulin isotypes often appear superficially similar in function, but they can indeed have subtle distinctions that are likely advantageous in nature.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Bowerman, C. Hunter, G. Ellis, and A. Wright for communicating unpublished results, J. Phillips for sharing reagents, and F. McNally and members of the Mains, McGhee, Brook, and Gaudet labs for helpful discussion. We thank the C. elegans Reverse Genetics Core Facility at the University of British Columbia (funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Genome Canada and Genome British Columbia) for tbb-2 and tbb-1 deletion strains, Y. Kohara for cDNA clones, and T. Stiernagle at the Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics Center (funded by the National Institutes of Health, Center for Research Resources) for providing several strains used in this study. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research to P.E.M. and by a Canadian Institute of Health Research graduate student voucher to C.L.

References

  1. Albertson, D. G., 1984. Formation of the first cleavage spindle in nematode embryos. Dev. Biol. 101: 61–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anders, K. R., and D. Botstein, 2001. Dominant-lethal alpha-tubulin mutants defective in microtubule depolymerization in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 3973–3986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baugh, L. R., A. A. Hill, D. K. Slonim, E. L. Brown and C. P. Hunter, 2003. Composition and dynamics of the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryonic transcriptome. Development 130: 889–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellanger, J. M., and P. Gonczy, 2003. TAC-1 and ZYG-9 form a complex that promotes microtubule assembly in C. elegans embryos. Curr. Biol. 13: 1488–1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bode, C. J., M. L. Gupta, K. A. Suprenant and R. H. Himes, 2003. The two alpha-tubulin isotypes in budding yeast have opposing effects on microtubule dynamics in vitro. EMBO Rep. 4: 94–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenner, S., 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clandinin, T. R., and P. E. Mains, 1993. Genetic studies of mei-1 gene activity during the transition from meiosis to mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 134: 199–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark-Maguire, S., and P. E. Mains, 1994. a Localization of the mei-1 gene product of Caenorhabditis elegans, a meiotic-specific spindle component. J. Cell Biol. 126: 199–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, A., C. R. Sage, C. A. Dougherty and K. W. Farrell, 1994. Microtubule dynamics modulated by guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis activity of beta-tubulin. Science 264: 839–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Derry, W. B., L. Wilson, I. A. Khan, R. F. Luduena and M. A. Jordan, 1997. Taxol differentially modulates the dynamics of microtubules assembled from unfractionated and purified beta-tubulin isotypes. Biochemistry 36: 3554–3562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Desai, A., and T. J. Mitchison, 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13: 83–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dougherty, C. A., C. R. Sage, A. Davis and K. W. Farrell, 2001. Mutation in the beta-tubulin signature motif suppresses microtubule GTPase activity and dynamics, and slows mitosis. Biochemistry 40: 15725–15732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dow, M. R., and P. E. Mains, 1998. Genetic and molecular characterization of the Caenorhabditis elegans gene, mel-26, a postmeiotic negative regulator of mei-1, a meiotic-specific spindle component. Genetics 150: 119–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edgar, L. G., and J. D. McGhee, 1986. Embryonic expression of a gut-specific esterase in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 114: 109–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, G. C., J. B. Phillips, S. O'Rourke, R. Lyczak and B. Bowerman, 2004. Maternally expressed and partially redundant beta-tubulins in Caenorhabditis elegans are autoregulated. J. Cell Sci. 117: 457–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fraser, A. G., R. S. Kamath, P. Zipperlen, M. Martinez-Campos, M. Sohrmann et al., 2000. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 408: 325–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fukushige, T., Z. K. Siddiqui, M. Chou, J. G. Culotti, C. B. Gogonea et al., 1999. MEC-12, an alpha-tubulin required for touch sensitivity in C. elegans. J. Cell Sci. 112(Pt. 3): 395–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Furukawa, M., Y. J. He, C. Borchers and Y. Xiong, 2003. Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 1001–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hannak, E., K. Oegema, M. Kirkham, P. Gonczy, B. Habermann et al., 2002. The kinetically dominant assembly pathway for centrosomal asters in Caenorhabditis elegans is gamma-tubulin dependent. J. Cell Biol. 157: 591–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hodgkin, J. A., and S. Brenner, 1977. Mutations causing transformation of sexual phenotype in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 86: 275–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoyle, H. D., and E. C. Raff, 1990. Two Drosophila beta tubulin isoforms are not functionally equivalent. J. Cell Biol. 111: 1009–1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hunter, A. W., M. Caplow, D. L. Coy, W. O. Hancock, S. Diez et al., 2003. The kinesin-related protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule ends. Mol. Cell 11: 445–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyman, A. A., and J. G. White, 1987. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 105: 2123–2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kemphues, K. J., N. Wolf, W. B. Wood and D. Hirsh, 1986. Two loci required for cytoplasmic organization in early embryos of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 113: 449–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kurz, T., L. Pintard, J. H. Willis, D. R. Hamill, P. Gonczy et al., 2002. Cytoskeletal regulation by the Nedd8 ubiquitin-like protein modification pathway. Science 295: 1294–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Löwe, J., H. Li, K. H. Downing and E. Nogales, 2001. Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 1045–1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu, C., M. Srayko and P. E. Mains, 2004. The Caenorhabditis elegans microtubule-severing complex MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin interacts differently with two superficially redundant {beta}-tubulin isotypes. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 142–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ludueña, R. F., 1998. Multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications. Int. Rev. Cytol. 178: 207–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mains, P. E., K. J. Kemphues, S. A. Sprunger, I. A. Sulston and W. B. Wood, 1990. a Mutations affecting the meiotic and mitotic divisions of the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Genetics 126: 593–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mains, P. E., I. A. Sulston and W. B. Wood, 1990. b Dominant maternal-effect mutations causing embryonic lethality in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 125: 351–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matthews, L. R., P. Carter, D. Thierry-Mieg and K. Kemphues, 1998. ZYG-9, a Caenorhabditis elegans protein required for microtubule organization and function, is a component of meiotic and mitotic spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 141: 1159–1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McNally, F. J., and R. D. Vale, 1993. Identification of katanin, an ATPase that severs and disassembles stable microtubules. Cell 75: 419–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchison, T. J., 1989. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. 109: 637–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mitchison, T., and M. Kirschner, 1984. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312: 237–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitenko, N. L., J. R. Eisner, J. R. Swiston and P. E. Mains, 1997. A limited number of Caenorhabditis elegans genes are readily mutable to dominant, temperature-sensitive maternal-effect embryonic lethality. Genetics 147: 1665–1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nogales, E., S. G. Wolf and K. H. Downing, 1998. Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature 391: 199–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Panda, D., H. P. Miller, A. Banerjee, R. F. Luduena and L. Wilson, 1994. Microtubule dynamics in vitro are regulated by the tubulin isotype composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 11358–11362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Phillips, J. B., R. Lyczak, G. C. Ellis and B. Bowerman, 2004. Roles for two partially redundant alpha-tubulins during mitosis in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 58: 112–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pintard, L., J. H. Willis, A. Willems, J. L. Johnson, M. Srayko et al., 2003. The BTB protein MEL-26 is a substrate-specific adaptor of the CUL-3 ubiquitin-ligase. Nature 425: 311–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Savage, C., M. Hamelin, J. G. Culotti, A. Coulson, D. G. Albertson et al., 1989. mec-7 is a beta-tubulin gene required for the production of 15-protofilament microtubules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 3: 870–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Segbert, C., R. Barkus, J. Powers, S. Strome, W. M. Saxton et al., 2003. KLP-18, a Klp2 kinesin, is required for assembly of acentrosomal meiotic spindles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 4458–4469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Srayko, M., D. W. Buster, O. A. Bazirgan, F. J. McNally and P. E. Mains, 2000. MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin-like microtubule severing activity is required for Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genes Dev. 14: 1072–1084. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Srayko, M., S. Quintin, A. Schwager and A. A. Hyman, 2003. Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 form a complex that is essential for long astral and spindle microtubules. Curr. Biol. 13: 1506–1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Strome, S., and W. B. Wood, 1983. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 35: 15–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Trinczek, B., J. Biernat, K. Baumann, E. M. Mandelkow and E. Mandelkow, 1995. Domains of tau protein, differential phosphorylation, and dynamic instability of microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 6: 1887–1902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vasquez, R. J., D. L. Gard and L. Cassimeris, 1994. XMAP from Xenopus eggs promotes rapid plus end assembly of microtubules and rapid microtubule polymer turnover. J. Cell Biol. 127: 985–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wicks, S. R., R. T. Yeh, W. R. Gish, R. H. Waterston and R. H. Plasterk, 2001. Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map. Nat. Genet. 28: 160–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wilson, P. G., and G. G. Borisy, 1997. Evolution of the multi-tubulin hypothesis. BioEssays 19: 451–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wright, A. J., and C. P. Hunter, 2003. Mutations in a beta-tubulin disrupt spindle orientation and microtubule dynamics in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 4512–4525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xia, L., B. Hai, Y. Gao, D. Burnette, R. Thazhath et al., 2000. Polyglycylation of tubulin is essential and affects cell motility and division in Tetrahymena thermophila. J. Cell Biol. 149: 1097–1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, L., Y. Wei, J. Reboul, P. Vaglio, T. H. Shin et al., 2003. BTB proteins are substrate-specific adaptors in an SCF-like modular ubiquitin ligase containing CUL-3. Nature 425: 316–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zetka, M. C., and A. M. Rose, 1992. The meiotic behavior of an inversion in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 131: 321–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhai, Y., P. J. Kronebusch, P. M. Simon and G. G. Borisy, 1996. Microtubule dynamics at the G2/M transition: abrupt breakdown of cytoplasmic microtubules at nuclear envelope breakdown and implications for spindle morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 135: 201–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES