Skip to main content
. 2005 Jun;170(2):881–898. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.035147

TABLE 3.

Power comparison with results of Abecasiset al. (2000a, Table 4)

No. of families/sample size N
One sib per
family:
480/1440
Two sibs per
family:
240/960
Three sibs per
family:
160/800
Four sibs per
family:
120/720
Five sibs per
family:
96/672
Six sibs per
family:
80/640
Eight sibs per
family:
60/600
D′ % No. of
simulated
data sets
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAW F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
AbAw F1,a,
1,a,
LRT
  0  0.2   0.1  0.0   0.1  0.1   0.1  0.1   0.1  0.2   0.1  0.1   0.1  0.0   0.1
 1,000   0.1   0.1   0.1   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0
 1,000   0.1   0.1   0.1   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0
20,000a   0.105   0.10   0.105   0.09   0.105   0.095   0.09
20,000b   0.105   0.10   0.105   0.09   0.085   0.085   0.09
 25  2.1  33.1  1.8  15.4  2.0  10.6  2.6   8.5  3.0   7.4  2.1   6.7  2.1   5.8
 1,000  33.0  14.8  11.2   7.3   8.2   5.3   4.3
 1,000  32.9  14.7  10.9   7.2   7.4   4.9   3.8
 50 19.5  99.2 22.9  89.4 24.8  78.6 26.7  70.7 26.7  65.2 27.2  61.2 23.9  56.0
 1,000  99.4  90.5  76.7  69.9  63.7  55.5  47.5
 1,000  99.4  90.4  76.4  69.0  62.8  54.1  45.0
 75 69.3 100 72.6 100 74.2  99.8 76.9  99.3 76.0  98.7 76.5  98.1 75.4  96.9
 1,000 100 100  99.9  99.2  98.9  97.3  94.6
 1,000 100 100  99.9  99.2  98.8  97.2  93.8
100 97.4 100 97.7 100 98.3 100 98.4 100 98.2 100 98.4 100 98.5 100
 1,000 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
 1,000 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

In the AbAw columns, the power (%) is taken from Abecasis et al. (2000a)(Table 4). In columns 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 the power (%) of F1,a is calculated on the basis of the theoretical approximation of noncentrality parameter λ1,a of test statistic F1,a at a 0.001 significance level; the empirical power (%) of 1,a and LRT are calculated as the proportions of 1000 or 20,000 simulated data sets that give significant results at the 0.001 significance level on the basis of F1,a and the likelihood-ratio test statistic, respectively. The parameters are the same as those of Abecasis et al. (2000a)(Table 4): Inline graphic, h2 = 0.1, σ2 = 100, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic. In addition, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

a

Results of the row are calculated on the basis of 1,a.

b

Results of the row are calculated on the basis of LRT.