Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1989 Dec 1;141(11):1155–1159.

Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.

R B Lowry 1, N Y Thunem 1, S Anderson-Redick 1
PMCID: PMC1451275  PMID: 2819634

Abstract

The Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System was started in 1966 in response to the thalidomide tragedy earlier in the decade. It was one of four provincial surveillance systems on which the federal government relied for baseline statistics of congenital anomalies. The government now collects data from six provinces and one territory. The Alberta Congenital Anomaly Surveillance System originally depended on three types of notification to the Division of Vital Statistics, Department of Health, Government of Alberta: birth notice and certificates of death and stillbirth; increased sources of ascertainment have greatly improved data quality. We present the data for 1980-86 and compare the prevalence rates of selected anomalies with the rates from three other surveillance systems. Surveillance systems do not guarantee that a new teratogen will be detected, but they are extremely valuable for testing hypotheses regarding causation. At the very least they provide baseline data with which to compare any deviation or trend. For many, if not most, congenital anomalies total prevention is not possible; however, surveillance systems can be used to measure progress in prevention.

Full text

PDF
1155

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baird P. A. Measuring birth defects and handicapping disorders in the population: the British Columbia Health Surveillance Registry. CMAJ. 1987 Jan 15;136(2):109–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bod M., Czeizel A. Congenital malformation surveillance. Teratology. 1981 Dec;24(3):277–283. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420240305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bower C., Stanley F. J., Kricker A. Congenital dislocation of the hip in Western Australia. A comparison of neonatally and postneonatally diagnosed cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Nov;(224):37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bower C., Stanley F. J. Western Australian Congenital Malformations Register. Med J Aust. 1983 Aug 20;2(4):189–191. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1983.tb122403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edmonds L. D., Layde P. M., James L. M., Flynt J. W., Erickson J. D., Oakley G. P., Jr Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems. Int J Epidemiol. 1981 Sep;10(3):247–252. doi: 10.1093/ije/10.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ericson A., Källén B., Winberg J. Surveillance of malformations at birth: a comparison of two record systems run in parallel. Int J Epidemiol. 1977 Mar;6(1):35–41. doi: 10.1093/ije/6.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoffman J. I., Christianson R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 1978 Oct;42(4):641–647. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90635-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knox E. G., Armstrong E. H., Lancashire R. The quality of notification of congenital malformations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Dec;38(4):296–305. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.4.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leck I., Record R. G., McKeown T., Edwards J. H. The incidence of malformations in Birmingham, England, 1950-1959. Teratology. 1968 Aug;1(3):263–280. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420010305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lowry R. B., Morgan K., Holmes T. M., Gilroy S. W. Congenital anomalies in the Hutterite population: a preliminary survey and hypothesis. Am J Med Genet. 1985 Nov;22(3):545–552. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320220312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowry R. B., Thunem N. Y., Silver M. Congenital anomalies in American Indians of British Columbia. Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3(6):455–467. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370030609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lowry R. B., Thunem N. Y., Uh S. H. Birth prevalence of cleft lip and palate in British Columbia between 1952 and 1986: stability of rates. CMAJ. 1989 May 15;140(10):1167–1170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lowry R. B., Trimble B. K. Incidence rates for cleft lip and palate in British Columbia 1952-71 for North American Indian, Japanese, Chinese and total populations: secular trends over twenty years. Teratology. 1977 Dec;16(3):277–283. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robert E., Guibaud P. Maternal valproic acid and congenital neural tube defects. Lancet. 1982 Oct 23;2(8304):937–937. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90908-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thunem N. Y., Lowry R. B., Tucker B. J., Medd B. W. Birth prevalence and recurrence rates of neural tube defects in southern Alberta in 1970-81. CMAJ. 1988 May 1;138(9):819–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES