Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1991 Feb 15;144(4):449–453.

Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989.

L Narine 1, D S Yee 1, T R Einarson 1, A L Ilersich 1
PMCID: PMC1452817  PMID: 1993292

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of abstracts of original research articles. DESIGN: Blind, criterion-based survey. SAMPLE: Systematic sample of 33 abstracts of original research articles published in CMAJ in 1989. MEASUREMENT: The quality of abstracts was measured against a checklist of evaluation criteria, which were divided into eight categories. A score for each abstract was obtained by dividing the number of criteria present by the number applicable. The overall mean score was also determined. RESULTS: The overall mean score of abstract quality was 0.63 (standard deviation 0.13) out of 1. Of the abstracts reporting study design 56% did not include specific technical descriptors. About 52% did not explicitly describe the study variables. In describing subject selection 79% failed to use specific technical terms. Of the abstracts reporting results 66% did not provide appropriate supporting data. Of those that gave conclusions 86% did not address study limitations and 93% made no recommendations for future study. CONCLUSION: Most of the abstracts provided some information pertaining to each evaluation criterion but did not provide detail sufficient to enhance the reader's understanding of the article. On the basis of the study sample the abstracts need improvement in description of research design, reporting of subject selection and results, and statements of limitations and recommendations. The small sample from one journal and the absence of comparison between the contents of the abstracts and the contents of the articles were limitations. Future studies should address these issues and compare the quality of traditional and structured abstracts.

Full text

PDF
449

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cummings S. R., Coates T. J., Richard R. J., Hansen B., Zahnd E. G., VanderMartin R., Duncan C., Gerbert B., Martin A., Stein M. J. Training physicians in counseling about smoking cessation. A randomized trial of the "Quit for Life" program. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Apr 15;110(8):640–647. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-8-640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans M., Pollock A. V. Trials on trial. A review of trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 1984 Jan;119(1):109–113. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390130091016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fletcher R. H. Writing an abstract. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Nov-Dec;3(6):607–609. doi: 10.1007/BF02596110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gøtzsche P. C. Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):31–56. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haynes R. B., Mulrow C. D., Huth E. J., Altman D. G., Gardner M. J. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 1;113(1):69–76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lock S. Structured abstracts. BMJ. 1988 Jul 16;297(6642):156–156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6642.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mulrow C. D., Thacker S. B., Pugh J. A. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Apr;108(4):613–615. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nordstrom D. M., West S. G., Andersen P. A., Sharp J. T. Pulse methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled prospective roentgenographic study. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Dec;107(6):797–801. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-6-797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parving H. H., Hommel E., Smidt U. M. Protection of kidney function and decrease in albuminuria by captopril in insulin dependent diabetics with nephropathy. BMJ. 1988 Oct 29;297(6656):1086–1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6656.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pitkin R. M. The importance of the abstract. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;70(2):267–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pocock S. J., Hughes M. D., Lee R. J. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 13;317(7):426–432. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708133170706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sacks H. S., Berrier J., Reitman D., Ancona-Berk V. A., Chalmers T. C. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 19;316(8):450–455. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702193160806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Soffer A. Abstracts of clinical investigations. A new and standardized format. Chest. 1987 Sep;92(3):389–390. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.3.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Squires B. P. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. CMAJ. 1990 Oct 1;143(7):619–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES