Abstract
Brucellosis caused by Brucella spp. is a major zoonotic disease. Control of brucellosis in agricultural animals is a prerequisite for the prevention of this disease in human beings. Recently, Brucella melitensis was declared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be one of three major bioterrorist agents due to the expense required for the treatment of human brucellosis patients. Also, the economic agricultural loss due to bovine brucellosis emphasizes the financial impact of brucellosis in society. Thus, vaccination might efficiently solve this disease. Currently, B. abortus RB51 and B. melitensis REV.1 are used to immunize cattle and to immunize goats and sheep, respectively, in many countries. However, these genetically undefined strains still induce abortion and persistent infection, raising questions of safety and efficiency. In fact, the REV.1 vaccine is quite virulent and apparently unstable, creating the need for improved vaccines for B. melitensis. In addition, Brucella spp. may or may not provide cross-protection against infection by heterologous Brucella species, hampering the acceleration of vaccine development. This review provides our current understanding of Brucella pathogenesis and host immunity for the development of genetically defined efficient vaccine strains. Additionally, conditions required for an effective Brucella vaccine strain as well as the future research direction needed to investigate Brucella pathogenesis and host immunity are postulated.
INTRODUCTION
Brucellosis is one of the five common bacterial zoonoses in the world caused by organisms belonging to the genus Brucella, gram-negative, non-spore-forming, facultative, intracellular bacteria (39). The genus Brucella consist of seven species according to antigenic variation and primary host: Brucella melitensis (sheep and goats), B. suis (hogs), B. abortus (cattle), B. ovis (sheep), B. canis (dogs), B. neotomae (wood rats), and B. maris (marine mammals) (38, 80). B. abortus induces spontaneous abortion in cattle and causes serious economic loss to dairy farms. Currently, B. abortus RB51 or B. melitensis REV.1 strains are used to immunize cattle and to immunize goats and sheep, respectively (14, 17, 39, 83). No other vaccines are available for other animals, and a human Brucella vaccine does not exist.
Phylogenetically, Brucella is classified within the α2 subdivision of Proteobacteria, which includes Agrobacterium, Rickettsia, Rhodobacter, and Rhizobium (109). The Brucella genome consists of two circular chromosomes without plasmids, suggesting a remarkable difference compared to the single chromosome of many bacteria (105, 106). The recent completion of B. melitensis (GenBank NC 003317 and NC 003318) (44), B. suis (GenBank NC 002969), and B. abortus (142) genome sequence projects has provided tremendous information for understanding the mechanisms of Brucella pathogenicity. B. melitensis contains 3,197 open reading frames and, as found with certain other α Proteobacteria, genes associated with DNA replication, transcription, translation metabolism, and cell wall biosynthesis are present on both chromosomes. Although Brucella is a serious pathogen, type I, II, and III secretion systems and pathogenicity islands were absent. However, B. melitensis did contain genes for flagellum-specific type III and IV secretion systems. Future studies to define the role of these secretion systems in Brucella intracellular survival will be necessary before we can understand the mechanisms of Brucella pathogenesis. Currently, these investigators (44) are evaluating the proteomic expression of Brucella to identify the bacterial proteins expressed in vitro. At present, the genomic sequence of B. suis is still being edited and annotated while the B. abortus sequence is still being completed. The availability of the genomic sequences of B. melitensis, B. suis, and B. abortus will provide an opportunity to identify the virulence mechanisms of Brucella at the molecular level that have previously proven highly elusive. Presently, six groups of bacteriophages (which are all closely related DNA phages of the same morphological group, Pedoviridae) are identified as lytic for Brucella (38). However, the presence of bacteriocins specific for Brucella or any evidence of gene transfer mediated by bacteriophages has not been confirmed.
Brucella infection occurs through inhalation or ingestion of organisms via the nasal, oral, and pharyngeal cavities (22). Following penetration of the mucosal epithelium, the bacteria are transported, either free or within phagocytic cells, to the regional lymph nodes. The spread and multiplication of Brucella in lymph nodes, spleen, liver, bone marrow, mammary glands, and sex organs occurs via macrophages. In general, B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suis can infect humans and the pathological manifestations of brucellosis in humans are meningitis, endocarditis, spondylitis, and arthritis. Due to the epidemic potential, the absence of a human vaccine, the drawbacks of current vaccine strains in terms of safety, and the efficiency of aerosol infection, this airborne pathogen is classified as a biosafety level 3 pathogen and considered to be a potential bioterrorist agent (86).
Bacteriologic culture and serological agglutination tests are widely used for the diagnosis of infected humans and animals. Human brucellosis patients are treated with combinations of antibiotics such as rifampin and doxycycline or streptomycin and doxycycline (22). Historically, 2% of untreated B. melitensis-infected patients die (103), and Brucella-induced deaths are still reported (31). Therefore, to eradicate human brucellosis, the control of brucellosis in agricultural animals is crucial because of the zoonotic aspects of this infectious disease. Currently, mice are used as an animal model for brucellosis and molecular genetic tools for Brucella are available, providing the efficient experimental tools to investigate the bacterial pathogenesis and host immune response for the development of vaccine strains.
BRUCELLA PATHOGENICITY
The origins of the diverse clinical manifestations in Brucella-infected human beings and animals have not been clearly elucidated. However, there is no doubt that the augmentation of Brucella replication in the host is ascribed to these symptoms. This increase of Brucella numbers in the host is mainly due to their ability to avoid the killing mechanisms and proliferate within macrophages like other intracellular pathogens. For example, Brucella organisms not only resist killing by neutrophils following phagocytosis (26, 133) but also replicate inside macrophages (85) and nonprofessional phagocytes (47). Additionally, survival in macrophages considered to be responsible for the establishment of chronic infections allows the bacteria to escape the extracellular mechanisms of host defense such as complement and antibodies. Therefore, to understand the pathogenesis of Brucella, the mechanisms that allow the intracellular survival of this pathogen have to be elucidated.
Phagosomes, a Unique Niche for Brucella
To be a successful infectious agent, Brucella requires four steps, like other pathogenic intracellular bacteria: adherence, invasion, establishment, and dissemination within the host (57, 99). Opsonized or nonopsonized Brucella organisms can infect macrophages, suggesting that antibody or complement-mediated phagocytosis as well as the direct Brucella-host cell contact allows adherence and invasion. In macrophage phagosomes, Brucella cells survive and multiply, inhibiting phagosome-lysosome fusion through rapid acidification of the phagosome following uptake. Thus, phagosomes of the macrophage are the intracellular niche for this pathogen (91). Finally, the accumulated bacteria are disseminated to other host cells. Thus, the most critical step for understanding the pathogenic mechanism of this intracellular bacterium is how Brucella organisms cope with phagocytic mechanisms of the host.
Brucella can infect phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells in vivo and in vitro. Infected nonphagocytic cells such as trophoblasts of the pregnant ruminant in vivo (5) as well as epithelioid HeLa (128) and fibroblast Vero (47) cell lines in vitro contain virulent Brucella organisms in the autophagosome and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Also, the ER is regarded as a location for Brucella multiplication. Infected phagocytic cells such as murine J774 cells contain Brucella in the phagosomes with a pH of 4 to 4.5, while autophagosomes or the ER of murine J774 do not harbor Brucella (130). However, the presence of Brucella in both phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells inhibits or delays phagosome and lysosome fusion (7, 128). The specific mechanism used to hamper phagolysosome fusion has not been elucidated clearly, but the soluble extract of virulent B. abortus strains excluding lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is considered to be involved in this phenomenon (62). Studies using Brucella mutants of a two-component regulatory system (bvrR-bvrS) or a type IV secretion system (virB) in a nonphagocytic HeLa cell model suggest the involvement of specific Brucella factors in the maturation of phagosomes. For example, Brucella defective in the bvrRS two-component regulatory system are not directed to the ER-like compartment but, rather, are present within phagosomes unable to inhibit fusion with lysosomes (147). Also, virB mutants deficient in a type IV secretion system are unable to reach the replicative niche and reside in a membrane-bound vacuole expressing the late endosomal marker, LAMP1, and the Sec61b protein from the ER membrane (35, 43).
Current Understanding of Brucella Pathogenesis
The recent availability of genetic techniques to manipulate the Brucella genome permits identification of virulence factors of Brucella at the molecular level. Previous studies to identify attenuation relied on culture passage of isolated strains or collection of diverse field strains following phenotypic characterization based on LPS structure (rough or smooth form) or injection of animal models (162). Since the early 1990s, molecular manipulation of the Brucella genome has permitted the characterization and identification of virulence genes by producing specific or random mutants searching for avirulent phenotypes (69, 131). The initial reverse genetic characterization of virulence factors relied on cloning, sequencing, mutagenesis, and infection of mutants in vitro or in vivo. This approach did not elucidate many virulence factors of Brucella. Many putative virulence factors that had been characterized from other intracellular bacterial pathogens turned out to be insignificant in this particular pathogen, suggesting that a unique host-pathogen interaction is established in brucellosis. Mini-Tn5 transposon mutagenesis was introduced to study Brucella pathogenesis. Even though this transposon mutagenesis requires an intensive screening step to obtain phenotypic mutants, this method was more productive in identifying a virulence factor than was the single-gene targeting approach. Characterized virulence factors following the generation of individual mutants are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Gene | Function | Species | Virulence
|
References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro | In vivo | ||||
pgm | Phosphoglucomutase (LPS synthesis) | B. abortus | Virulent | Attenuated | 156 |
rfbE | Perosamine synthetase (LPS synthesis) | B. melitensis | Virulent | Attenuated | 65 |
pmm | Phosphomannomutase (LPS synthesis) | B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 2 |
wboA | Glycosyltransferase (LPS synthesis) | B. abortus | NDa | Attenuated | 104 |
cydB | Cytochrome bd oxidase (respiratory system) | B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 54 |
cgs | Cyclic β-1,2 glucan synthetase | B. abortus | Attenuated (only S19) | Attenuated (only S19) | 23, 77 |
sod | Cu-Zn SOD | B. abortus | Virulent | Attenuated (only S2308) | 154 |
dnaK | Heat shock protein | B. suis | Attenuated | NDa | 93 |
lon | Protease | B. abortus | Attenuated | Virulent | 135 |
bacA | Cytoplasmic membrane transport protein | B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 98 |
hfq | Host factor-1, RNA-binding protein regulating stationary-phase stress resistance | B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 136 |
virB | Type IV secretion system | B. suis, B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 59, 75, 116, 146 |
bvrRS | Two-component regulatory protein | B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 147 |
aroC | Chorismate synthase (aromatic compound synthesis) | B. suis, B. abortus | Attenuated | Attenuated | 59, 60, 75 |
purE | De novo purine synthesis pathway | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 41, 49, 76 |
ND, not determined.
Lipopolysaccharide.
Brucella has two forms, smooth and rough (38). In general, rough strains, containing less or no O polysaccharide (OPS), are less virulent than smooth strains and less resistant to complement attack. However, occasionally, naturally virulent strains of B. ovis and B. canis are rough stains. There are two aspects to the identification of Brucella LPS as a virulence factor. First, Brucella possesses less immunogenic LPS than enterobacterial LPS. Nonpyrogenic Brucella LPS does not activate the alternative complement pathway to any significant level and is a very weak mitogen for murine B cells (143). Furthermore, at least 10-fold more Brucella LPS is required for lethality and interferon (IFN) production than with enterobacterial endotoxin (87). Thus, the lower biological activity induced by Brucella LPS might be one of the factors contributing to the survival of these pathogens in phagocytic cells. Second, OPS-deficient Brucella mutants are sensitive to complement-mediated lysis and polymyxin B. For example, B. abortus phosphomannomutase (pmm) transposon mutants were attenuated in vivo and in vitro and were sensitive to complement-mediated killing as well as to polymyxin B, a defensin-like molecule (2). B. abortus glycosyltransferase (wboA) deletion mutants were more attenuated than the parental strain, S2308, but more persistent than RB51 in vivo (104). B. abortus phosphoglucomutase (pgm) insertional mutants were attenuated in vivo but not in vitro (156). B. melitensis perosamine synthase (rfbE) deletion mutants were attenuated in mice but not in macrophages (65). All of the above OPS-deficient mutants were attenuated in vivo, but there were some survival differences in macrophages, indicating that complement-mediated lysis or a lectin pathway may play a role in controlling extracellular Brucella; however, the level of intracellular infection and replication was not reduced.
Cyclic β(1-2) glucan.
Cyclic β(1-2) glucan is an osmoregulated periplasmic polysaccharide of the plant pathogens Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium meliloti, which are involved in nodule invasion or crown gall tumor induction in plants (19). Brucella spp. classified within the α2 subdivision of Proteobacteria, which includes Agrobacterium and Rhizobium, also contain cyclic β(1-2) glucan (24). In Brucella, this sugar is produced by cyclic β(1-2) glucan synthetase encoded by cgs (23) but is not osmotically regulated (24). The cgs deletion mutants made from B. abortus S19 (vaccine strain) were attenuated in vivo and in vitro, but minimal attenuation was noted in cgs mutants made from S2308 (field strain) (23), indicating that strain differences may exist. Also, a protection assay using S19 cgs mutants showed similar protection to that for S19, but more immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) was induced.
bacA.
A highly conserved B. abortus homologue of the R. meliloti bacA gene, which encodes a putative cytoplasmic membrane transport protein required for symbiosis, was identified (98). B. abortus bacA deletion mutants were attenuated in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that the bacterium-plant symbiosis could be an alternative model to study Brucella pathogenesis.
bvrR-bvrS.
The B. abortus two-component regulatory system consisting of the Brucella virulence-related regulatory (BvrR) and sensory (BvrS) proteins is highly similar to the two-component regulatory systems ChvG-ChvI of A. tumefaciens and ExoS-ChvI of R. meliloti, which are equivalent to Salmonella PhoP-PhoQ and Bordetella bronchiseptica BvgA-BvgS systems (147). Transposon mutants of bvrR and bvrS were originally identified by their sensitivity to polymyxin B but were also sensitive to other bactericidal polycations such as melittin and poly-l-lysine, suggesting that a change of the outer membrane occurred in these mutants. Insertional bvrR or bvrS mutants possessed reduced multiplication and minimal persistence in mouse spleens in vivo and displayed reduced invasiveness and replication in macrophages and HeLa cells in vitro, suggesting the inability to inhibit lysosme fusion. Other putative two-component regulatory systems involved in Brucella virulence, such as ntrY (59) and vsrB (97), have been discovered by signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis (STM), but specific phenotypes have not been delineated yet.
virB.
B. suis virB genes, encoding a type IV secretion system homologous to those encoded by A. tumefaciens virB and B. pertussis ptl genes, were originally identified from attenuated transposon mutants in vitro (116); later, the B. abortus S2308 genome project confirmed the intact virB operon (146). The A. tumefaciens virB operon encodes a pilus-like structure necessary for secretion of transfer DNA, and the B. pertussis ptl operon encodes the apparatus that allows the secretion of pertussis toxin, suggesting that Brucella may secrete regulatory DNA or protein for intracellular survival. VirB10 is an inner membrane-bound protein possessing a C-terminal periplasmic domain with homology in all type IV secretion systems. Brucella virB10 polar and nonpolar mutants had the same penetration effect as the wild type but were unable to replicate in phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells in vitro. Also, these mutants were attenuated in vivo, suggesting that virB is a virulence factor. In fact, phagosomes containing virB10 polar mutants fused with lysosomes and were directed to a degradation pathway (35, 43). In contrast, virB10 nonpolar mutants were capable of avoiding interactions with the endocytic pathway but were unable to reach the ER to establish their intracellular replication niche in HeLa cells. These results suggest that VirB proteins are involved in the maturation of Brucella-containing vacuoles.
cydB.
B. abortus cydB transposon mutants, attenuated in vitro and in vivo, are defective in cytochrome bd oxidase, a high-oxygen-affinity terminal oxidase used by Escherichia coli under microaerobic conditions (54). These mutants were sensitive to hydrogen peroxide. Overexpression of the oxidative radical-scavenging enzyme Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) or catalase restored resistance to hydrogen peroxide similar to that of wild-type Brucella, suggesting that cyd mutants are susceptible to reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) in macrophages. However, the specific mechanisms of ROI susceptibility in cydB mutants have not been investigated.
purE and aroC.
Phagosomes of macrophages contain limited nutrition for intracellular bacteria (58). Thus, auxotrophic mutations in essential metabolic pathways generate derivative strains with reduced virulence (74). For example, Salmonella mutants that require aromatic compounds (aroA) or adenine (purA) for growth were attenuated. In this context, B. melitensis purine-auxotrophic purE deletion mutants defective in the de novo pathway leading to inosine biosynthesis were generated and were attenuated in vitro (49) and in vivo (41). B. suis aromatic compound auxotrophic aroC::Tn5 mutants were originally identified by STM in vitro (59), and then in vivo attenuation was confirmed (60). The aroC gene encodes chorismate synthase, which catalyzes the conversion of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) to chorismic acid. Chorismate is a branching point from which separate pathways lead to the aromatic amino acids (i) para-aminobenzoic acid and to hence folic acid, vitamin K, ubiquinone, and the electron transport systems, and (ii) dihydroxybenzoic acid, which is the first step in the biosynthesis of the siderophore enterochelin. Thus, the aroC mutation causes serious metabolic problems in bacteria. In fact, these auxotrophic mutants are useful for developing genetically defined live, attenuated vaccine strains of bacterial pathogens. B. melitensis purE mutants are being tested as a vaccine strain (33, 121).
Heat shock proteins.
Bacterial pathogens that maintain long-term residence within host phagocytes probably express a variety of genes to help them adapt to the harsh environmental conditions of pH, nutrition deprivation, ROIs, and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs) as well as lysosomal enzymes encountered within the phagosome (10). Prominent among these responses is the induction of heat shock proteins, suggesting that considerable protein misfolding and damage occurs within this compartment (101, 132). However, the role of these proteins in Brucella pathogenesis was uncertain. B. abortus lon transposon mutants were attenuated in BALB/c resident peritoneal macrophages but persistent in BALB/c mice except for a minor attenuation at 1 week postinfection, suggesting that Lon protease is important for Brucella survival during early infection (135). B. suis dnaK insertional mutants, defective in a member of the Hsp70 family, were attenuated in the human macrophagic cell line, U937 (93). B. abortus htrA deletion mutants, deficient in a serine protease called high-temperature-requirement A protein, have been considered to be attenuated in vitro and in vivo (53, 126), but a recent report suggests that htrA mutants were in fact htrA cycL double deletion mutants (50). An additional report suggests that a B. melitensis authentic htrA deletion mutant was not attenuated in goats, suggesting that HtrA is not involved in Brucella pathogenesis (139). Also, the B. suis clpA deletion mutant was not attenuated in vitro or in vivo (51). Taken together, these reports suggest that not all heat shock proteins are critical to Brucella pathogenesis or that redundant function of heat shock proteins will compromise the functional deficiency caused by the loss of one heat shock protein.
hfq.
RNA chaperone host factor 1 (HF-1) is an abundant protein that participates in numerous regulatory pathways in E. coli (112). This protein acts posttranscriptionally to regulate the expression of the alternative sigma factor, RpoS, required for maintenance of the stationary-phase growth state. B. abortus hfq deletion mutants were sensitive to H2O2 and acid stress in stationary phase and were attenuated in BALB/c resident peritoneal macrophages as well as BALB/c mice (136), suggesting that HF-1 contributes to resistance of killing by host macrophages.
sod.
SOD forms part of the antioxidant defense system that protects bacteria from the toxic effects of ROIs by converting superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen (63), suggesting that it plays a crucial role in Brucella intracellular survival. B. abortus S19 sod deletion mutants were not attenuated in vitro or in vivo (154). However, B. abortus S2308 sod deletion mutants were attenuated in BALB/c mice but virulent in HeLa and J774 cell lines, suggesting a role for SOD in activated macrophages in vivo.
BRUCELLA IMMUNITY
Innate Immunity
Innate immunity is composed of nonspecific immune response in the early stage of infection before adaptive immunity, mediated by clonal selection of specific lymphocytes, has become established. Thus, the ultimate roles of the innate immune system in Brucella infection in vivo are to reduce the initial number of infected bacteria without memorization and to provide the environment for generating Th1 immune responses in the host.
Complement.
Complement is a system of plasma proteins that interact with bound antibodies or bacterial surfaces to opsonize or directly kill the pathogens by forming a membrane attack complex with gram-negative bacteria (137). Currently, three pathways of complement activation mechanism have been elucidated: (i) the classical pathway, mediated by antigen-antibody complexes; (ii) the alternative pathway, induced by certain structures on the surface of microorganisms in an antibody-independent manner; and (iii) the lectin pathway, activated by the binding of mannose-binding lectin to carbohydrates on microbial surfaces. Because the major surface component of Brucella is an LPS, the interaction between Brucella and complement components will be mediated by this molecule. In general, smooth strains of B. abortus are more resistant than OPS-deficient rough strains to serum bactericidal activity (37) because B. abortus LPS obtained from smooth strains does not activate the alternative pathway (72). Thus, the action of the classical pathway mediated by IgM and low concentrations of IgG has been considered to be the dominant bactericidal action of serum against B. abortus mediated in the early stage of infection. Recent results using B. abortus and B. melitensis wboA mutants lacking OPS suggest that both the classical pathway and the lectin pathway are involved in complement deposition and complement-mediated killing of Brucella (56). However, at the later stage of Brucella infection in cattle, the increased concentration of IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies appeared to block killing of extracellular Brucella (37), even though opsonization still occurred, suggesting concomitant extension of disease. This contradictory role for antibody and complement in Brucella immunity has been explained by prozone effects (73).
Neutrophils.
Neutrophils are short-life-cycle cells constituting 50 to 70% of human blood cells; their major function is phagocytosis. Thus, neutrophils are probably the first immune-associated cell in human infection to encounter Brucella. Rapid phagocytosis of virulent and attenuated Brucella strains by neutrophils occurs only following opsonization with normal human serum (164), suggesting that opsonization is a prerequisite for phagocytosis. However, the survival of Brucella in neutrophils during early infection has been observed (133), suggesting that the transportation of Brucella to lymphoid tissues can be mediated by neutrophils and that antimicrobial resistance mechanisms against hypohalide, lactoferrin, bacterial permeability-increasing factor, serprocidins, phospholipase A2, cathelicidin, lysozyme, and defensins, as well as ROIs and RNIs, may exist in Brucella (115). For example, B. abortus releases GMP and adenine and inhibits the myeloperoxidase-H2O2-halide antibacterial systems in bovine neutrophils by hampering degranulation (27). Also, viable Brucella organisms, but not cell wall fractions of virulent Brucella strains, inhibit the respiratory oxidative burst by neutrophils (27, 95).
NK cells.
Aqueous ether extract of B. abortus strain 456, known as Bru-Pel, stimulated NK cytotoxicity against YAC-1 cells (163). The cytotoxicity of human NK cells was enhanced when NK cells were treated with interleukin-12 (IL-12) obtained from macrophages treated with heat-killed B. abortus in vitro (165), suggesting a significant role of NK cells in brucellosis. In addition, human brucellosis patients have impaired NK cytotoxicity against YAC-1 cells that can be overcome by in vitro incubation with IL-2 (141), suggesting that the dysfunction of NK cells promotes the chronicity of infection. In contrast, mice with NK cell depletion as a result of monoclonal antibody anti-NK1.1 or polyclonal antibody anti-asialo-GM1 antiserum did not harbor the increased splenic and hepatic B. abortus CFU during the first week after infection (55), suggesting that the role of NK cells in mice is minor.
Macrophages.
The bactericidal functions contained in macrophages are ROIs and RNIs, which are induced by gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). Treatment of murine macrophages with methylene blue, an electron carrier, and ROI inhibitors increased and decreased the number of intracellular B. abortus organisms, respectively (82). However, the RNI inhibitor NG-monomethyl-l-arginine could not block the anti-Brucella activities in macrophages, suggesting that ROIs play a greater role than RNIs in Brucella killing in vitro. This result is compatible with a previous report that phagocytosis of B. suis by mouse macrophages induced superoxide production (64). In addition, iron-loaded macrophages activated with IFN-γ had an increased capacity to kill intracellular brucellae and frequently eliminated all intracellular brucellae due to the ability of iron to catalyze the Haber-Weiss reaction, confirming an important function of ROIs (9, 81). However, B. abortus-infected NOS2 as well as gp91phox knockout (KO) mice showed delayed control of infection, suggesting that both RNIs and ROIs play a role in controlling Brucella infection in the early stages of infection in vivo (89) (Table 2). In addition, the infected NOS2/gp91phox double-KO mice showed a delayed control of infection, suggesting that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and NADPH oxidase-independent killing mechanisms exist in mice. A recent understanding of IFN signaling suggests that IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs), a family of second transcriptional factors, mediate diverse phenotypes induced by IFNs. Among the nine IRFs, the expression of IRF-1, IRF-2, ICSBP (IRF-8), and IRF-9 is induced by IFN-γ, and IRF-1-, IRF-2-, and ICSBP-deficient mice were infected with B. abortus (Table 2) (89). Infected IRF-1 KO mice died within 2 weeks due to hepatic damage, while IRF-2 KO mice were more resistant to infection than were wild-type mice. The role of IRF-2 involves downregulation of the genes activated by IRF-1, supporting the significance of IRF-1 in brucellosis. Also, ICSBP KO mice were susceptible to infection. These results suggest that IRF-1 and ICSBP are involved in the Brucella-controlling mechanisms induced by IFN-γ.
TABLE 2.
Mouse strain | Function | Deficient phenotypes | Species | Result of infection | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF-1−/− | IRF-1 | IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, iNOS, CD8+ T cells, NK cells | B. abortus | Acute death | 89 |
IRF-2−/− | IRF-2 | IL-12, NK cells | B. abortus | Resistant | 89 |
ICSBP−/− | ICSBP | IL-12, ROIs | B. abortus | Susceptible | 89 |
NOS2−/− | iNOS | Nitric oxide in macrophages | B. abortus | Delayed control | 89 |
gp91phox−/− | NADPH oxidase component | NADPH oxidase-dependent ROIs | B. abortus | Delayed control | 89 |
IL-12p40−/− | IL-12 component | IL-12 | B. abortus | Susceptible | 89 |
IFN-γ−/− | IFN-γ | IFN-γ | B. abortus | Death (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) | 113 |
TNFR−/− | TNF receptors 1 (p55) and 2 (p75) | TNF-α signaling | B. abortus | Susceptible | 168 |
NF-IL-6−/− | Nuclear factor IL-6 | G-CSF | B. abortus | Susceptible in vitro | 127 |
β2-m−/− | MHC class I β2-microglobulin | CD8+ T cells | B. abortus | Susceptible to S19, resistant to S2308 | 113, 119 |
Aβ−/− | MHC class II Aβ chain | CD4+ T cells | B. abortus | Resistant | 119 |
Rag-1−/− | Recombination activation gene 1 | Matured B and T cells | B. melitensis | Susceptible | 79 |
SCID | Lacks mature B and T cells | Matured B and T cells | B. abortus | Resistant | Morfitt et al.a |
Nude | Thymic stroma, matured T cells | Lacks matured T cells | B. abortus | Susceptible (persistence) | 32 |
Perforin−/− | CTL killing | Absence of perforin-mediated killing | B. abortus | Resistant | 113 |
D. C. Morfitt, N. F. Cheville, and A. E. Jensen, Proc. Conf. Res. Workers Anim. Dis. 72:2, 1991.
Nramp1.
Murine susceptibility to Leishmania, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium was influenced by one gene, located on chromosome 1 (12). A reverso-genetics approach identified a candidate gene, Nramp1, which was expressed only in macrophagelike cells. A single nonconservative amino acid substitution in this transporter was found to correlate with the susceptible genotype in 27 inbred mouse strains. In murine brucellosis, resistance to the attenuated B. abortus strain 19 occurs in the Lsh/Ity/Bcg-susceptible mouse strains such as C57BL/10 and BALB/c while susceptibility occurs in the Lsh/Ity/Bcg-resistant CBA/H mice (71), suggesting that resistance to Brucella seems to be more complex or associated with different genes. However, bovine Nramp1 stable transfectants of RAW264.7 cells control B. abortus infection better than do parental cell lines in vitro (11), suggesting that natural heritable resistance plays a role in bovine brucellosis.
Adaptive Immunity
Adaptive immune responses are critical for providing the memory function that is the key player in vaccination. Functions of the adaptive immune response in brucellosis can be classified into three mechanisms. First, IFN-γ produced by CD4+, CD8+, and γδ T cells activates the bactericidal function in macrophages to hamper the intracellular survival of Brucella. Second, cytotoxicity of CD8+ and γδT cells kills the infected macrophages. Third, Th1-type antibody isotypes such as IgG2a and IgG3 opsonize the pathogen to facilitate phagocytosis.
αβ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
The major role of T cells in Brucella immunity is secretion of IFN-γ for the activation of bactericidal function in macrophages and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity as well as IgG2a and IgG3 isotype switching. The significance of CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells in Brucella immunity has been controversial. Adoptive transferred BALB/c mice with CD4+, CD8+, and whole T-cell populations obtained from mice immunized for 6 weeks contained fewer splenic Brucella CFU than did untreated mice after infection (6), suggesting that both T-cell populations are important in Brucella immunity. However, recent experiments with Aβ−/− and β2-m−/− mice infected with B. abortus strain 19 suggest that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-deficient mice, which have no CD8+ T cells, control the infection more slowly than do wild-type mice while MHC class II-deficient mice, defective in CD4+ T cells, control the infection similarly to wild-type mice (119), suggesting that CD8+ T cells play a critical role. This result is compatible with the previous report that anti-Lyt-2- and complement-treated spleen mononuclear cells could not provide protection (124), suggesting that CD8+ T cells comprised the predominant protective population. Others, however, have suggested that β2-m−/− mice infected with B. abortus strain 2308 controlled infection and that CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes were not important after the first week of infection with a virulent strain of B. abortus (113). The differences in the results may be related to the strain of B. abortus used in the β2-m−/− mice. Additional experiments with MHC class I-deficient mice as well as wild-type mice suggest that the production of Th-1 type cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-2 by CD8+ T cells has an important function in controlling brucellosis (119). The importance of IFN-γ in resolution of Brucella infection was supported by studies with BALB/c and C57BL/6 IFN-γ−/− mice infected with B. abortus strain 2308 since these infected mice died in approximately 6 weeks (113). However, the major T-cell population is CD4+ T cells in terms of number, and this cell population secretes IFN-γ. Thus, the role of CD4+ T cells in brucellosis should not be ignored.
γδ T cells.
Human patients infected with B. melitensis contain increased numbers of γδ T cells possessing the Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell receptor (TCR) in peripheral blood (13, 123). Vγ9Vδ2 T cells activated by nonpeptide antigens control the increase in the number of intracellular Brucella organisms by secreting TNF-α and IFN-γ to activate macrophage bactericidal function and by lysing the infected cells through cytotoxicity in vitro (122). Interestingly, in cattle younger than 1 year, the major T-cell population is not αβ T cells but γδ T cells, suggesting that the role of γδ T cells could be more significant in Brucella-infected calves. However, the role of these γδ T cells in vivo has not been characterized.
B cells.
Many serum passive-transfer experiments suggest the significance of humoral immunity in murine brucellosis. For example, passive transfer of sera containing anti-LPS antibodies to mice could protect against challenge with virulent B. abortus (6, 107, 161). Also, passive transfer of B. abortus OPS-specific monoclonal antibody (IgG2a) could reduce bacterial infection in mice or protect mice from B. abortus infection (106, 108, 125). IgG2a and IgG3 are dominant antibody isotypes detected from the infected mice, similar to the natural host, suggesting that a Th1 immune response to Brucella infection occurred (52). Opsonization, probably coupled with enhancement of intracellular killing, is regarded as the principal protective role of antibody against Brucella infection. Despite numerous reports of a role for humoral immunity in resistance to brucellosis, the ability of antibody to protect the host appears controversial. For instance, the B. abortus RB51 strain lacking OPS still provides the best protection as a vaccine strain, indicating that immune protection is possible without OPS-specific antibody (145). Also in bovine brucellosis, the high concentration of IgG during active infection prevents extracellular bacterial lysis mediated by complement and promotes bacterial phagocytosis, enhancing the intracellular location of bacteria and the extension of disease (73).
Cytokines.
Cytokines play two critical roles in immune responses: (i) to mediate innate and adaptive immunity and (ii) to direct the immune response among immune-associated cells. Cytokines, regarded as key players in brucellosis, are IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α. IL-12 is a key cytokine produced by B cells and macrophages and leads Th1 immune responses in the host that will ultimately induce the secretion of IFN-γ from T cells. The significance of IL-12 in brucellosis has been well described (89, 167). However, the mechanisms of IL-12 induction in those cells have not been elucidated. Th1-polarized T cells produce IFN-γ, which activates the bactericidal function of macrophages, the host cells of Brucella spp., and this phagocytic function can be maximized by the treatment of TNF-α produced by macrophages and NK cells (166, 168, 170). In fact, live B. suis can inhibit TNF-α production in human macrophages by secreting proteins, suggesting another Brucella strategy for intracellular survival (28). An elevated IL-6 concentration in serum has been detected in Brucella-infected humans and antigen-treated mice (1, 169). CD4+ T cells produce IL-6, but the role of IL-6 in brucellosis has not been clearly delineated (144). Additionally, other cytokines are involved in Brucella immunity in mice. The detection of fewer CFU in spleens in mice given recombinant IL-1 suggests an important role of IL-1 in murine brucellosis (171). The role of IL-1 in murine brucellosis was speculated to induce colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and increase the numbers of neutrophils and macrophages in the spleen. In fact, mice given CSF for the first 14 days of infection experienced an influx of macrophages into the spleen and liver, and fewer CFU were detected in the spleen but not in the liver, supporting the previous speculation about the role of IL-1 (48). Also, the addition of granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) to macrophages obtained from NF-IL-6 KO mice restores both endocytosis and the morphology of endosomes as well as bactericidal activity in macrophages (127), suggesting the importance of G-CSF in phagocytosis.
Vaccine Strategy
Live or dead vaccines.
Immunization with killed B. abortus S2308 provided better protection than immunization with live S19 at 1 week postinoculation (107). However, at 4 weeks postinoculation mice immunized with killed Brucella could not provide protection while mice immunized with live B. abortus S19 provided log 2 protection, suggesting that a live vaccine is superior to a killed vaccine. Additional vaccination results using B. abortus S2308, S19, and RB51 suggest that the persistence of the Brucella vaccine strain is critical to maximum protection (68, 149, 151, 157). Compared to subunit and DNA vaccines, the attenuated vaccine contains all the immunogenic components that can be involved in protection, making this vaccine type more efficient. Currently, many B- and T-cell antigens have been identified. B-cell antigens (Table 3) have been used as a diagnostic marker, but the antibodies produced by these antigens also can be involved in opsonization in the host. T-cell antigens (Table 4) that have been characterized by cell proliferation assays are CD4+ T-cell antigens presented to the TCR through MHC class II. These activated CD4+ T cells produce a significant amount of IFN-γ. However, C57BL/6 mice infected with B. abortus S19 produced cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity (119), suggesting that antigens presented to the TCR through MHC class I exist. No endogenous peptides presented by MHC class I molecules have been identified.
TABLE 3.
Antigen | Function | Species | Serum host | Protection | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Omp19 | Outer membrane protein | B. abortus | Mouse, goat, dog, human | NDa | 94 |
Omp25 | Outer membrane protein | B. ovis | Mouse | Yes | 18 |
Omp28 | Outer membrane protein | B. melitensis | Human | ND | 102 |
Omp31 | Outer membrane protein | B. ovis | Ram | Yes | 88 |
Omp89 | Outer membrane protein | B. abortus | Cattle | ND | 100 |
CP24 | Ribosome-releasing factor | B. melitensis | Sheep | ND | 159 |
HtrA | Heat shock protein | B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. canis | Mouse, cattle, goat, dog | ND | 138 |
18-kDa protein | Lumazine synthase | B. ovis, B. canis | Human, cattle | ND | 8, 66, 67 |
BCSP31 | Unknown | Brucella spp. except B. ovis | Rabbit | ND | 20 |
DnaK | Heat shock protein | B. melitensis, B. ovis | Mouse, sheep | ND | 155, 160 |
BP26 (CP28) | Periplasmic or cytoplasmic protein | B. abortus, B. melitensis | Cattle, human, ram | ND | 42, 140 |
17-kDa protein | Unknown | B. abortus, B. melitensis | Sheep, cattle | ND | 70 |
22.9-kDa protein | Unknown | B. abortus | Unknown | Yesb | 30 |
32.2-kDa protein | Unknown | B. abortus | Unknown | No | 30 |
20-kDa protein (antigen A-2) | Unknown | B. melitensis | Unknown | ND | 148, 173 |
Dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase | Dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase | B. ovis | Mouse | ND | 155 |
31-kDa protein | Unknown | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
Malate dehydrogenase | Malate dehydrogenase | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
Succinyl coenzyme A synthetase alpha subunit | Succinyl coenzyme A synthetase alpha subunit | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
ABCa-type transporter | ABC-type transporter | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
Leu/Ile/Val-binding-protein precursor | Leu/Ile/Val-binding-protein precursor | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
ClpP | Stress protein | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
NikA | Nickel transport | B. ovis | Unknown | ND | 155 |
ND, not determined; ABC, ATP-binding cassette.
With Freund’s adjuvant.
TABLE 4.
Antigen | Function | Species | Host | Protection | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P39 | Periplasmic binding protein | B. melitensis | Guinea pig, cattle, mouse | Yes, with CpG | 3, 45, 46 |
Bacterioferritin | Iron-binding protein | B. melitensis | Guinea pig, cattle, mouse | Yes, with CpG | 3, 46 |
GroEL | Heat shock protein | B. abortus | Mouse, guinea pig | NDa | 117, 118, 120, 150 |
GroES | Heat shock protein | B. abortus | Mouse, guinea pig | ND | 117, 120 |
YajC | Transmembrane protein | B. abortus | Mouse | ND | 158 |
UvrA | DNA repair enzyme | B. abortus | Cattle, mouse, guinea pig | ND | 117, 120, 172 |
L7/L12 | Ribosomal proteins | B. abortus | Mouse | Yes, with Freund's adjuvant | 117, 120 |
BA14K | Unknown | B. abortus | Mouse | ND | 34 |
SOD (BCSP20) | Cu-Zn SOD | B. abortus | Cattle, mouse | Yes, but synthetic peptide | 21, 152, 153 |
31 kDa | Unknown | B. abortus | Cattle | ND | 25 |
ND, not determined; CpG, unmethylated synthetic CpG oligonucleotides.
Subunit and DNA vaccines.
Cell-mediated immunity is the dominant immune response required for protection against brucellosis. Thus, the concept of a subunit vaccine in brucellosis is based on the generation of memory Th1 cells by immunization with T-cell antigen. The initial requirement for a subunit vaccine approach is to identify T-cell antigens (Table 4). So far, P39, bacterioferritin, and L7/L12 proteins have been purified and tested as subunit vaccines with adjuvants (3, 120). Mice immunized with these proteins had a certain level of protection when challenged. Alternatively, DNA vaccination has been tried by using genes encoding the L7/L12 proteins, and this method also conferred some degree of protection (96). However, will subunit or DNA immunizations provide long-term protection to the hosts? Perhaps the injection of recombinant proteins made with many T-cell epitopes or DNA encoding recombinant T-cell epitopes may provide better protection than a single-epitope subunit vaccine. However, it is not clear whether such vaccination approaches will be effective for long-term protection. No specific experiment has been performed to answer this question.
FUTURE TRENDS
The 21st century is the period of postgenomics. For brucellosis research, the completion of the human and murine genome projects will provide an opportunity for screening genome-wide responses to Brucella infection in the host. In addition, the B. melitensis and B. abortus genome projects should provide useful information for performing reverse-genetic approaches to elucidate virulence factors. Thus, based on “gain of function” and “loss of function,” various genetic approaches in the host and pathogen are being explored. Also, diverse computer-aided fluorescence- or luminescence-based detection systems will be utilized to monitor the location of Brucella in vitro and in vivo.
Genome-Wide Screening, Gene Arrays and Proteomics
Gene arrays and proteomics are novel computer-aided screening systems to detect changes at the transcriptional and/or translational level in the host and/or pathogen (29). These complementary screening systems are very powerful in detecting the small changes in gene transcription or translation and providing patterns of gene expression to improve our knowledge of highly complex networks that cross-communicate in the cells. However, there are two problems with these techniques. First, there is not a good correlation between mRNA and protein levels (4), implying that many transcriptional changes are not biologically relevant. Second, there is a requirement to substantiate the biological relevance of the genes that indicated transcriptional and translational changes in host-pathogen interaction models. The application of gene KOs within the pathogen and host will provide an approach to investigate the significance of the changes observed in gene arrays and proteomics. Taken together, even with the shortcomings of genome-wide screening systems, the patterns of gene expression will facilitate the elucidation of the interplay between host and pathogen.
Introduction of Green Fluorescent Protein-encoded Brucella Strains
Cellular microbiology is an emerging discipline that is being used to investigate the effect of microbes on cell biology (40, 129). For instance, many intracellular bacteria can survive inside specialized compartments or in the cytoplasm, suggesting that these bacteria have unique invasion mechanisms. In fact, the dissection of bacterial pathogenesis provides information for understanding the dynamics of the host cell cytoskeleton, intracellular membrane, and signal transduction events. In Brucella research, the movement of Brucella inside of phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells is being investigated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Brucella strains (114, 134). This fluorescence-based technique is a useful tool to detect the cellular location of Brucella in combination with diverse monoclonal antibodies to define the molecular organelles. In addition, GFP is quite stable and can be used for immunostaining of Brucella on the tissue sections with GFP-specific monoclonal antibodies.
Novel Methods To Identify Brucella Virulence Factors
The most recent significant breakthrough in Brucella pathogenesis research is the application of STM, where mutants were tested in phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells (59) as well as acute (97) and chronic (51) stages of infection in mice. Many Brucella attenuated mutants have been identified and are being characterized individually (Table 5). In addition, differential fluorescence induction (92) has identified several promoters induced specifically within macrophage cell lines. However, individual mutants must be generated to establish a role for these genes in Brucella virulence. In addition, the recent completion of the Brucella genome projects should provide useful information about Brucella physiology and pathogenesis (142, 146), codifying the renaissance of reverse genetics.
TABLE 5.
Gene | Function | Species | Virulence
|
References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro | In vivo | ||||
ntrY | Two-component system (nitrogen metabolism) | B. suis | Attenuated | NDa | 59 |
glnD | Uridylyl transferase (nitrogen metabolism) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
pgi | Phosphoglucose isomerase (glucose metabolism) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
manB | Phosphomannomutase (LPS synthesis) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
gpt | Guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (nucleotide synthesis) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
LTTR-like | LysR family transcriptional regulator | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
carAB | Carbamoyl phosphate synthase (arginine and pyrimidine metabolism) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
rpsA | Ribosomal protein S1 | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
pyc | Pyruvate carboxylase (glucose metabolism) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
leuA | Isopropylmalate synthase (leucine synthesis) | B. suis | Attenuated | ND | 59 |
cysK | O-Acetylserine (thiol)-lyase (amino acid metabolism) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
cysI | Sulfite reductase (amino acid metabolism) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
metH | Homocysteine-N5-methyltetrahydrofolate transmethylase (amino acid metabolism) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
mgtB | Mg2+ pump (transporter) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
rbsC | Ribose permease (transporter) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
ugpA | Glycerol-3-phosphate permease (transporter) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
ccrM | Adenine DNA methyltransferase (DNA metabolism) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
dnaJ | Heat shock protein | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
mtgA | Peptidoglycan transglycosylase (membrane metabolism) | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
vsrB | Two-component system | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
fliF | Flagellar MS ring | B. melitensis | Attenuated | Attenuated | 97 |
gcvB | Glycine dehydrogenase | B. abortus | ND | Attenuated | 75 |
gluP | Glucose/galactose permease | B. abortus | ND | Attenuated | 75 |
wbkA | LPS synthesis | B. abrotus | ND | Attenuated | 75 |
gltD | Glutamate synthase | B. abortus | ND | Attenuated | 75 |
ND, not determined.
In Vivo Imaging System
The virulence of Brucella has been assessed in vivo by enumerating the residual CFU in splenic or hepatic tissues in a time-dependent manner. However, the current development of photonic detection systems promises to monitor the kinetics of bacteria in vivo without killing the infected mice (36, 61). Basically, luxABCDE Brucella can be used to infect mice and the infected mice can be analyzed using an intensified charge-coupled device camera and analytical software. This simple equipment will alleviate the ethical problems caused by killing mice, accelerate the detection of attenuation in Brucella strains, and detect the location of Brucella in vivo in a time-dependent manner.
Dominant Negative Cells and Gene Knockout Mice
The loss of function is a dominant dogma in genetics to analyze the function of a gene. The two major approaches to generate loss-of-function phenotypes are the use of dominant negative cell lines and the use of gene KO mice. Diverse KO mice have been used in Brucella research for elucidating the function of respective immune components (Table 2). However, dominant negative cell lines have not been used in brucellosis research, unlike other intracellular bacterial pathogen research (78, 111). The generation of dominant negative cells requires a relatively short time compared to the production of gene KO mice. Besides, dominant negative cell lines will be useful for in vitro experiments in cases where the gene KO is lethal to the mice.
Gene-to-Gene or Function-to-Function Interactions
During the last several decades in brucellosis research, three different kinds of combinatorial experiments were widely performed. First, to understand the general immune responses in the host, wild-type mice were infected with wild-type Brucella strains. Second, to find a virulence factor or to detect the attenuation in Brucella, mutant Brucella strains were used to infect wild-type mice. Third, to understand the role of specific immune components in brucellosis, gene KO mice were infected with wild-type Brucella strains. However, gene KO mouse infection with mutant Brucella strains had not been performed in brucellosis research until the introduction of IRF-1−/− mice. The virulence of B. abortus in IRF-1−/− mice can be assessed by either the death or survival of infected mice (89). The rapidity of death of IRF-1−/− mice and the hepatic damage correlated with virulence when mice were infected with 5 × 105 CFU (90), suggesting that the hepatic damage contributes to the death of IRF-1−/− mice. This is one example of a combinatorial experiment. Similarly, STM experiments can be performed directly with specific gene KO mice instead of wild-type mice. Each KO mouse provides a different selective pressure to the mutants, and different sets of mutants are selected compared to wild-type mice. Thus, a unique opportunity exists to identify particular bacterial genes that cope with specific immune components. Alternatively, in vitro STM can be performed using specific KO cell lines such as dominant negative cell lines or cells obtained from individual gene KO mice. By using a specific dominant negative cell line infected with Brucella, host responses could be analyzed with DNA chips or proteomics. Also, gene KO mice could be infected with Brucella and then the responses of a purified cell population could be detected by using DNA chips or proteomics. Not only wild-type Brucella but also diverse genetically manipulated Brucella mutants can be used for these kinds of combinatorial experiments.
CONCLUSION
Novel Brucella vaccine strains have to be made based on an insightful understanding of bacterial pathogenesis and host immunity. The rapid progress in brucellosis research was possible due to the application of STM, GFP-encoded Brucella strains, and gene KO mice. Characteristics of a Brucella vaccine, based on current knowledge, would be a live, attenuated organism without OPS because (i) a live, attenuated Brucella strain can persist in the host to stimulate Th1 immune responses and provide the antigens to stimulate B and T cells and (ii) the absence of OPS can serve as a diagnostic marker to discern infected and vaccinated animals. Therefore, the generation of live, attenuated strains based on host-pathogen interactions is being explored in combination with rapid and effective methods to detect attenuation in Brucella strains. In conjunction with genome-wide screening techniques, application of in vivo imaging of bacteria and IRF-1 KO mice will facilitate the detection of attenuation and ultimately accelerate the development of Brucella vaccine strains.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 AI48490) and the Binational Agricultural and Research and Development Fund (US.-2968-98C).
REFERENCES
- 1.Ahmed, K., K. A. Al-Matrouk, G. Martinez, K. Oishi, V. O. Rotimi, and T. Nagatake. 1999. Increased serum levels of interferon-gamma and interleukin-12 during human brucellosis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61:425-427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allen, C. A., L. G. Adams, and T. A. Ficht. 1998. Transposon-derived Brucella abortus rough mutants are attenuated and exhibit reduced intracellular survival. Infect. Immun. 66:1008-1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Mariri, A., A. Tibor, P. Mertens, X. De Bolle, P. Michel, J. Godefroid, K. Walravens, and J. J. Letesson. 2001. Protection of BALB/c mice against Brucella abortus 544 challenge by vaccination with bacterioferritin or P39 recombinant proteins with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as adjuvant. Infect. Immun. 69:4816-4822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anderson, L., and J. Seilhamer. 1997. A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver. Electrophoresis 18:533-537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anderson, T. D., and N. F. Cheville. 1986. Ultrastructural morphometric analysis of Brucella abortus-infected trophoblasts in experimental placentitis. Bacterial replication occurs in rough endoplasmic reticulum. Am. J. Pathol. 124:226-237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Araya, L. N., P. H. Elzer, G. E. Rowe, F. M. Enright, and A. J. Winter. 1989. Temporal development of protective cell-mediated and humoral immunity in BALB/c mice infected with Brucella abortus. J. Immunol. 143:3330-3337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arenas, G. N., A. S. Staskevich, A. Aballay, and L. S. Mayorga. 2000. Intracellular trafficking of Brucella abortus in J774 macrophages. Infect. Immun. 68:4255-4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baldi, P. C., M. M. Wanke, M. E. Loza, N. Monachesi, and C. A. Fossati. 1997. Diagnosis of canine brucellosis by detection of serum antibodies against an 18 kDa cytoplasmic protein of Brucella spp. Vet. Microbiol. 57:273-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baldwin, C. L., X. Jiang, and D. M. Fernandes. 1993. Macrophage control of Brucella abortus: influence of cytokines and iron. Trends Microbiol. 1:99-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baldwin, C. L., and A. J. Winter. 1994. Macrophages and Brucella. Immunol. Ser. 60:363-380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barthel, R., J. Feng, J. A. Piedrahita, D. N. McMurray, J. W. Templeton, and L. G. Adams. 2001. Stable transfection of the bovine NRAMP1 gene into murine RAW264.7 cells: effect on Brucella abortus survival. Infect. Immun. 69:3110-3119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bellamy, R. 1999. The natural resistance-associated macrophage protein and susceptibility to intracellular pathogens. Microbes Infect. 1:23-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bertotto, A., R. Gerli, F. Spinozzi, C. Muscat, F. Scalise, G. Castellucci, M. Sposito, F. Candio, and R. Vaccaro. 1993. Lymphocytes bearing the gamma delta T cell receptor in acute Brucella melitensis infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:1177-1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blasco, J. M. 1997. A review of the use of B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine in adult sheep and goats. Prev. Vet. Med. 31:275-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blasco, J. M., C. Marin, M. P. Jimenez de Bagues, and M. Barberan. 1993. Efficacy of Brucella suis strain 2 vaccine against Brucella ovis in rams. Vaccine 11:1291-1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boschiroli, M. L., V. Foulongne, and D. O'Callaghan. 2001. Brucellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:58-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bosseray, N. 1991. Brucella melitensis Rev. 1 living attenuated vaccine: stability of markers, residual virulence and immunogenicity in mice. Biologicals 19:355-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowden, R. A., A. Cloeckaert, M. S. Zygmunt, and G. Dubray. 1998. Evaluation of immunogenicity and protective activity in BALB/c mice of the 25-kDa major outer-membrane protein of Brucella melitensis (Omp25) expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:39-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Breedveld, M. W., and K. J. Miller. 1994. Cyclic beta-glucans of members of the family Rhizobiaceae. Microbiol. Rev. 58:145-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bricker, B. J., L. B. Tabatabai, B. L. Deyoe, and J. E. Mayfield. 1988. Conservation of antigenicity in a 31-kDa Brucella protein. Vet. Microbiol. 18:313-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bricker, B. J., L. B. Tabatabai, B. A. Judge, B. L. Deyoe, and J. E. Mayfield. 1990. Cloning, expression, and occurrence of the Brucella Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase. Infect. Immun. 58:2935-2939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brinley Morgan, W. J., and M. J. Corbel. 1990. Brucella infections in man and animals: contagious equine metritis, p. 547-570. In M. T. Parker and L. H. Collier (ed.), Topley and Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology and immunology, 8th ed. Edward Arnold, London, England.
- 23.Briones, G., N. Inon de Iannino, M. Roset, A. Vigliocco, P. S. Paulo, and R. A. Ugalde. 2001. Brucella abortus cyclic beta-1,2-glucan mutants have reduced virulence in mice and are defective in intracellular replication in HeLa cells. Infect. Immun. 69:4528-4535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Briones, G., N. Inon de Iannino, M. Steinberg, and R. A. Ugalde. 1997. Periplasmic cyclic 1,2-beta-glucan in Brucella spp. is not osmoregulated. Microbiology 143:1115-1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brooks-Worrell, B. M., and G. A. Splitter. 1992. Antigens of Brucella abortus S19 immunodominant for bovine lymphocytes as identified by one- and two-dimensional cellular immunoblotting. Infect. Immun. 60:2459-2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Canning, P. C., J. A. Roth, and B. L. Deyoe. 1986. Release of 5′-guanosine monophosphate and adenine by Brucella abortus and their role in the intracellular survival of the bacteria. J. Infect. Dis. 154:464-470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Canning, P. C., J. A. Roth, L. B. Tabatabai, and B. L. Deyoe. 1985. Isolation of components of Brucella abortus responsible for inhibition of function in bovine neutrophils. J. Infect. Dis. 152:913-921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Caron, E., A. Gross, J. P. Liautard, and J. Dornand. 1996. Brucella species release a specific, protease-sensitive, inhibitor of TNF-α expression, active on human macrophage-like cells. J. Immunol. 156:2885-2893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Celis, J. E., M. Kruhoffer, I. Gromova, C. Frederiksen, M. Ostergaard, T. Thykjaer, P. Gromov, J. Yu, H. Palsdottir, N. Magnusson, et al. 2000. Gene expression profiling: monitoring transcription and translation products using DNA microarrays and proteomics. FEBS. Lett. 480:2-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cespedes, S., E. Andrews, H. Folch, and A. Onate. 2000. Identification and partial characterisation of a new protective antigen of Brucella abortus. J. Med. Microbiol. 49:165-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chevalier P, E. Bonnefoy, G. Kirkorian, and P. Touboul. 1996. Brucella pancarditis with fatal outcome. Presse Med. 25:628-630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheville, N. F., R. A. Kunkle, A. E. Jensen, and M. V. Palmer. 1995. Persistence of Brucella abortus in the livers of T cell-deficient nude mice. Lab. Investig. 73:96-102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cheville, N. F., S. C. Olsen, A. E. Jensen, M. G. Stevens, A. M. Florance, H. S. Houng, E. S. Drazek, R. L. Warren, T. L. Hadfield, and D. L. Hoover. 1996. Bacterial persistence and immunity in goats vaccinated with a purE deletion mutant or the parental 16M strain of Brucella melitensis. Infect. Immun. 64:2431-2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chirhart-Gilleland, R. L., M. E. Kovach, P. H. Elzer, S. R. Jennings, and R. M. Roop, 2nd. 1998. Identification and characterization of a 14-kilodalton Brucella abortus protein reactive with antibodies from naturally and experimentally infected hosts and T lymphocytes from experimentally infected BALB/c mice. Infect. Immun. 66:4000-4003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Comerci, D. J., M. J. Martinez-Lorenzo, R. Sieira, J. P. Gorvel, and R. A. Ugalde. 2001. Essential role of the VirB machinery in the maturation of the Brucella abortus-containing vacuole. Cell. Microbiol. 3:159-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Contag, C. H., P. R. Contag, J. I. Mullins, S. D. Spilman, D. K. Stevenson, and D. A. Benaron. 1995. Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts. Mol. Microbiol. 18:593-603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Corbeil, L. B., K. Blau, T. J. Inzana, K. H. Nielsen, R. H. Jacobson, R. R. Corbeil, and A. J. Winter. 1988. Killing of Brucella abortus by bovine serum. Infect. Immun. 56:3251-3261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Corbel, M. J. 1990. Brucella, p. 339-353. In M. T. Parker and L. H. Collier (ed.), Topley and Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology and immunology, 8th ed. Edward Arnold, London, England.
- 39.Corbel, M. J. 1997. Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:213-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cossart, P., P. Boquet, S. Normark, and R. Rappuoli. 1996. Cellular microbiology emerging. Science 271:315-316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Crawford, R. M., D. V. Van, L. Yuan, T. L. Hadfield, R. L. Warren, E. S. Drazek, H. H. Houng, C. Hammack, K. Sasala, T. Polsinelli, et al. 1996. Deletion of purE attenuates Brucella melitensis infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 64:2188-2192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Debbarh, H. S., M. S. Zygmunt, G. Dubray, and A. Cloeckaert. 1996. Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies to the Brucella melitensis BP26 protein to evaluate antibody responses in infected and B. melitensis Rev.1 vaccinated sheep. Vet. Microbiol. 53:325-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Delrue, R. M., M. Martinez-Lorenzo, P. Lestrate, I. Danese, V. Bielarz, P. Mertens, X. De Bolle, A. Tibor, J. P. Gorvel, and J. J. Letesson. 2001. Identification of Brucella spp. genes involved in intracellular trafficking. Cell. Microbiol. 3:487-497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.DelVecchio, V. G., V. Kapatral, R. J. Redkar, G. Patra, C. Mujer, T. Los, N. Ivanova, I. Anderson, A. Bhattacharyya, A. Lykidis, G. Reznik, L. Jablonski, N. Larsen, M. D'Souza, A. Bernal, M. Mazur, E. Goltsman, E. Selkoy, P. H. Elzer, S. Hagius, D. O'Callaghan, J. J. Letesson, R. Haselkorn, N. Kyrpides, and R. Overbeek. 2002. The genome sequence of the facultative intracellular pathogen Brucella melitensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:443-448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Denoel, P. A., T. K. Vo, A. Tibor, V. E. Weynants, J. M. Trunde, G. Dubraym, J. N. Limet, and J. J. Letesson. 1997. Characterization, occurrence, and molecular cloning of a 39-kilodalton Brucella abortus cytoplasmic protein immunodominant in cattle. Infect. Immun. 65:495-502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Denoel, P. A., T. K. Vo, V. E. Weynants, A. Tibor, D. Gilson, M. S. Zygmunt, J. N. Limet, and J. J. Letesson. 1997. Identification of the major T-cell antigens present in the Brucella melitensis B115 protein preparation, Brucellergene OCB. J. Med. Microbiol. 46:801-806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Detilleux, P. G., B. L. Deyoe, and N. F. Cheville. 1990. Penetration and intracellular growth of Brucella abortus in nonphagocytic cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 58:2320-2328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Doyle, A. G., W. J. Halliday, C. J. Barnett, T. L. Dunn, and D. A. Hume. 1992. Effect of recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 on immunopathology of experimental brucellosis in mice. Infect. Immun. 60:1465-1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Drazek, E. S., H. S. Houng, R. M. Crawford, T. L. Hadfield, D. L. Hoover, and R. L. Warren. 1995. Deletion of purE attenuates Brucella melitensis 16M for growth in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect. Immun. 63:3297-3301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Edmonds, M., N. Booth, S. Hagius, J. Walker, F. Enright, and R. M. Roop, Jr., and P. Elzer. 2000. Attenuation and immunogenicity of a Brucella abortus htrA cycL double mutant in cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 76:81-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ekaza, E., L. Guilloteau, J. Teyssier, J. P. Liautard, and S. Kohler. 2000. Functional analysis of the ClpATPase ClpA of Brucella suis, and persistence of a knockout mutant in BALB/c mice. Microbiology 146:1605-1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Elzer, P. H, R. H. Jacobson, K. H. Nielsen, J. T. Douglas, and A. J. Winter. 1994. BALB/c mice infected with Brucella abortus express protracted polyclonal responses of both IgG2a and IgG3 isotypes. Immunol. Lett. 42:145-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Elzer, P. H., R. W. Phillips, G. T. Robertson, and R. M. Roop, Jr. 1996. The HtrA stress response protease contributes to resistance of Brucella abortus to killing by murine phagocytes. Infect. Immun. 64:4838-4841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Endley, S., D. McMurray, and T. A. Ficht. 2001. Interruption of the cydB locus in Brucella abortus attenuates intracellular survival and virulence in the mouse model of infection. J. Bacteriol. 183:2454-2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fernandes, D. M., R. Benson, and C. L. Baldwin. 1995. Lack of a role for natural killer cells in early control of Brucella abortus 2308 infections in mice. Infect. Immun. 63:4029-4033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fernandez-Prada, C. M., M. Nikolich, R. Vemulapalli, N. Sriranganathan, S. M. Boyle, G. G. Schurig, T. L. Hadfield, and D. L. Hoover. 2001. Deletion of wboA enhances activation of the lectin pathway of complement in Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. Infect. Immun. 69:4407-4416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Finlay, B. B., and S. Falkow. 1989. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity. Microbiol. Rev. 53:210-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Finlay, B. B., and S. Falkow. 1997. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:136-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Foulongne, V., G. Bourg, C. Cazevieille, S. Michaux-Charachon, D. O'Callaghan. 2000. Identification of Brucella suis genes affecting intracellular survival in an in vitro human macrophage infection model by signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 68:1297-1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Foulongne, V., K. Walravens, G. Bourg, M. L. Boschiroli, J. Godfroid, M. Ramuz, and D. O'Callaghan. 2001. Aromatic compound-dependent Brucella suis is attenuated in both cultured cells and mouse models. Infect. Immun. 69:547-550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Francis, K. P., D. Joh, C. Bellinger-Kawahara, M. J. Hawkinson, T. F. Purchio, and P. R. Contag. 2000. Monitoring bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus infections in living mice using a novel luxABCDE construct. Infect. Immun. 68:3594-3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Frenchick, P. J., R. J. Markham, and A. H. Cochrane. 1985. Inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion in macrophages by soluble extracts of virulent Brucella abortus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 46:332-335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fridovich, I. 1989. Superoxide dismutases. An adaptation to a paramagnetic gas. J. Biol. Chem. 264:7761-7764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gay, B., S. Sanchez-Teff, and R. Caravano. 1984. Ultrastructural localization of NADPH-oxidase activity in murine peritoneal macrophages during phagocytosis of Brucella. Correlation with the production of superoxide anions. Virchows. Arch. B 45:147-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Godfroid, F, B. Taminiau, I. Danese. P. Denoel, A. Tibor, V. Weynants, A. Cloeckaert, J. Godfroid, and J. J. Letesson. 1998. Identification of the perosamine synthetase gene of Brucella melitensis 16M and involvement of lipopolysaccharide O side chain in Brucella survival in mice and in macrophages. Infect. Immun. 66:5485-5493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Goldbaum, F. A., J. Leoni, J. C. Wallach, and C. A. Fossati. 1993. Characterization of an 18-kilodalton Brucella cytoplasmic protein which appears to be a serological marker of active infection of both human and bovine brucellosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2141-2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Goldbaum, F. A., C. A. Velikovsky, P. C. Baldi, S. Mortl, A. Bacher, and C. A. Fossati. 1999. The 18-kDa cytoplasmic protein of Brucella species—an antigen useful for diagnosis—is a lumazine synthase. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:833-839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Grillo, M. J., N. Bosseray, and J. M. Blasco. 2000. In vitro markers and biological activity in mice of seed lot strains and commercial Brucella melitensis Rev 1 and Brucella abortus B19 vaccines. Biologicals 28:119-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Halling, S. M., P. G. Detilleux, F. M. Tatum, B. A. Judge, and J. E. Mayfield. 1991. Deletion of the BCSP31 gene of Brucella abortus by replacement. Infect. Immun. 59:3863-3868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hemmen, F., V. Weynants, T. Scarcez, J. J. Letesson, and E. Saman. 1995. Cloning and sequence analysis of a newly identified Brucella abortus gene and serological evaluation of the 17-kilodalton antigen that it encodes. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2:263-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ho, M., and C. Cheers. 1982. Resistance and susceptibility of mice to bacterial infection. IV. Genetic and cellular basis of resistance to chronic infection with Brucella abortus. J. Infect. Dis. 146:381-387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hoffmann, E. M., and J. J. Houle. 1983. Failure of Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to activate the alternative pathway of complement. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 5:65-76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hoffmann, E. M., and J. J. Houle. 1995. Contradictory roles for antibody and complement in the interaction of Brucella abortus with its host. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 21:153-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hoiseth, S. K., and B. A. Stocker. 1981. Aromatic-dependent Salmonella typhimurium are non-virulent and effective as live vaccines. Nature 291:238-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hong, P. C., R. M. Tsolis, and T. A. Ficht. 2000. Identification of genes required for chronic persistence of Brucella abortus in mice. Infect. Immun. 68:4102-4107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hoover, D. L., R. M. Crawford, L. L. Van De Verg, M. J. Izadjoo, A. K. Bhattacharjee, C. M. Paranavitana, R. L. Warren, M. P. Nikolich, and T. L. Hadfield. 1999. Protection of mice against brucellosis by vaccination with Brucella melitensis WR201(16M ΔpurEK). Infect. Immun. 67:5877-5884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Inon de Iannino, N., G. Briones, M. Tolmasky, and R. A. Ugalde. 1998. Molecular cloning and characterization of cgs, the Brucella abortus cyclic beta(1- 2) glucan synthetase gene: genetic complementation of Rhizobium meliloti ndvB and Agrobacterium tumefaciens chvB mutants. J. Bacteriol. 180:4392-4400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ireton, K., B. Payrastre, H. Chap, W. Ogawa, H. Sakaue, M. Kasuga, and P. Cossart. 1996. A role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase in bacterial invasion. Science 274:780-782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Izadjoo, M. J., Y. Polotsky, M. G. Mense, A. K. Bhattacharjee, C. M. Paranavitana, T. L. Hadfield, and D. L. Hoover. 2000. Impaired control of Brucella melitensis infection in Rag1-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 68:5314-5320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jahans, K. L., G. Foster, and E. S. Broughton. 1997. The characterisation of Brucella strains isolated from marine mammals. Vet. Microbiol. 57:373-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jiang, X., and C. L. Baldwin. 1993. Iron augments macrophage-mediated killing of Brucella abortus alone and in conjunction with interferon-gamma. Cell. Immunol. 148:397-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jiang, X., B. Leonard, R. Benson, and C. L. Baldwin. 1993. Macrophage control of Brucella abortus: role of reactive oxygen intermediates and nitric oxide. Cell. Immunol. 151:309-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jimenez de Bagues, M. P., C. M. Marin, M. Barberan, and J. M. Blasco. 1989. Responses of ewes to B. melitensis Rev1 vaccine administered by subcutaneous or conjunctival routes at different stages of pregnancy. Ann. Rech. Vet. 20:205-213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jimenez de Bagues, M. P., M. Barberan, C. M. Marin, and J. M. Blasco. 1995. The Brucella abortus RB51 vaccine does not confer protection against Brucella ovis in rams. Vaccine 13:301-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jones, S. M., and A. J. Winter. 1992. Survival of virulent and attenuated strains of Brucella abortus in normal and gamma interferon-activated murine peritoneal macrophages. Infect. Immun. 60:3011-3014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kaufmann, A. F., M. I. Meltzer, and G. P. Schmid. 1997. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:83-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Keleti, G., D. S. Feingold, and J. S. Youngner. 1974. Interferon induction in mice by lipopolysaccharide from Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 10:282-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kittelberger, R., F. Hilbink, M. F. Hansen, G. P. Ross, G. W. de Lisle, A. Cloeckaert, and J. de Bruyn. 1995. Identification and characterization of immunodominant antigens during the course of infection with Brucella ovis. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 7:210-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ko, J., A. Gendron-Fitzpatrick, and G. A. Splitter. 2002. Susceptibility of interferon regulatory factor (IRF-1) and interferon consensus sequence binding protein (ICSBP) deficient mice to brucellosis. J. Immunol. 168:2433-2440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ko, J., A. Gendron-Fitzpatrick, T. A. Ficht, and G. A. Splitter. 2002. Virulence criteria for Brucella abortus strains as determined by interferon regulatory factor-1 deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 70:7004-7012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kohler, S., M. Layssac, A. Naroeni, I. Gentschev, M. Rittig, and J. P. Liautard. 2001. Secretion of listeriolysin by Brucella suis inhibits its intramacrophagic replication. Infect. Immun. 69:2753-2756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kohler, S., S. Ouahrani-Bettache, M. Layssac, J. Teyssier, and J. P. Liautard. 1999. Constitutive and inducible expression of green fluorescent protein in Brucella suis. Infect. Immun. 67:6695-6697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kohler, S., J. Teyssier, A. Cloeckaert, B. Rouot, and J. P. Liautard. 1996. Participation of the molecular chaperone DnaK in intracellular growth of Brucella suis within U937-derived phagocytes. Mol. Microbiol. 20:701-712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kovach, M. E., P. H. Elzer, G. T. Robertson, R. L. Chirhart-Gilleland, M. A. Christensen, K. M. Peterson, and R. M. Roop, Jr. 1997. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of a Brucella abortus gene encoding an 18 kDa immunoreactive protein. Microb. Pathog. 22:241-246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kreutzer, D. L., L. A. Dreyfus, and D. C. Robertson. 1979. Interaction of polymorphonuclear leukocytes with smooth and rough strains of Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 23:737-742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kurar, E., and G. A. Splitter. 1997. Nucleic acid vaccination of Brucella abortus ribosomal L7/L12 gene elicits immune response. Vaccine 15:1851-1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lestrate, P., R. M. Delrue, I. Danese, C. Didembourg, B. Taminiau, P. Mertens, X. De Bolle, A. Tibor, C. M. Tang, and J. J. Letesson. 2000. Identification and characterization of in vivo attenuated mutants of Brucella melitensis. Mol. Microbiol. 38:543-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.LeVier, K., R. W. Phillips, V. K. Grippe, R. M. Roop, Jr., and G. C. Walker. 2000. Similar requirements of a plant symbiont and a mammalian pathogen for prolonged intracellular survival. Science 287:2492-2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Liautard, J. P., A. Gross, J. Dornand, and S. Kohler. 1996. Interactions between professional phagocytes and Brucella spp. Microbiologia 12:197-206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Limet, J. N., A. Cloeckaert, G. Bezard, J. Van Broeck, and G. Dubray. 1993. Antibody response to the 89-kDa outer membrane protein of Brucella in bovine brucellosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 39:403-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Lin, J., and T. A. Ficht. 1995. Protein synthesis in Brucella abortus induced during macrophage infection. Infect. Immun. 63:1409-1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lindler, L. E., T. L. Hadfield, B. D. Tall, N. J. Snellings, F. A. Rubin, L. L. Van De Verg, D. Hoover, and R. L. Warren. 1996. Cloning of a Brucella melitensis group 3 antigen gene encoding Omp28, a protein recognized by the humoral immune response during human brucellosis. Infect. Immun. 64:2490-2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Madkour, M. M. 2001. Madkour's brucellosis, p. 11. Springer Verlag, New York, N.Y.
- 104.McQuiston, J. R., R. Vemulapalli, T. J. Inzana, G. G. Schurig, N. Sriranganathan, D. Fritzinger, T. L. Hadfield, R. A. Warren, L. E. Lindler, N. Snellings, et al. 1999. Genetic characterization of a Tn 5-disrupted glycosyltransferase gene homolog in Brucella abortus and its effect on lipopolysaccharide composition and virulence. Infect. Immun. 67:3830-3835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Michaux, S., J. Paillisson, M. J. Carles-Nurit, G. Bourg, A. Allardet-Servent, and M. Ramuz. 1993. Presence of two independent chromosomes in the Brucella melitensis 16M genome. J. Bacteriol. 175:701-705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Michaux-Charachon, S., G. Bourg, E. Jumas-Bilak, P. Guigue-Talet, A. Allardet-Servent, D. O'Callaghan, and M. Ramuz. 1997. Genome structure and phylogeny in the genus Brucella. J. Bacteriol. 179:3244-3249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Montaraz, J. A., and A. J. Winter. 1986. Comparison of living and nonliving vaccines for Brucella abortus in BALB/c mice. Infect. Immun. 53:245-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Montaraz, J. A., A. J. Winter, D. M. Hunter, B. A. Sowa, A. M. Wu, and L. G. Adams. 1986. Protection against Brucella abortus in mice with O-polysaccharide-specific monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 51:961-963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Moreno, E., E. Stackebrandt, M. Dorsch, J. Wolters, M. Busch, and H. Mayer. 1990. Brucella abortus 16S rRNA and lipid A reveal a phylogenetic relationship with members of the alpha-2 subdivision of the class Proteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 172:3569-3576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Reference deleted.
- 111.Mounier, J., V. Laurent, A. Hall, P. Fort, M. F. Carlier, P. J. Sansonetti, and C. Egile. 1999. Rho family GTPases control entry of Shigella flexneri into epithelial cells but not intracellular motility. J. Cell Sci. 112:2069-2080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Muffler, A., D. Fischer, and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1996. The RNA-binding protein HF-I, known as a host factor for phage Qβ RNA replication, is essential for rpoS translation in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 10:1143-1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Murphy, E. A, J. Sathiyaseelan, M. A. Parent, B. Zou, and C. L. Baldwin. 2001. Interferon-gamma is crucial for surviving a Brucella abortus infection in both resistant C57BL/6 and susceptible BALB/c mice. Immunology 103:511-518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Naroeni, A., N. Jouy, S. Ouahrani-Bettache, J. P. Liautard, and F. Porte. 2001. Brucella suis-impaired specific recognition of phagosomes by lysosomes due to phagosomal membrane modifications. Infect. Immun. 69:486-493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Nathan, C., and M. U. Shiloh. 2000. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the relationship between mammalian hosts and microbial pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8841-8848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.O'Callaghan, D., C. Cazevieille, A. Allardet-Servent, M. L. Boschiroli, G. Bourg, V. Foulongne, P. Frutos, Y. Kulakov, and M. Ramuz. 1999. A homologue of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB and Bordetella pertussis Pt1 type IV secretion systems is essential for intracellular survival of Brucella suis. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1210-1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Oliveira, S. C., J. S. Harms, M. Banai, and G. A. Splitter. 1996. Recombinant Brucella abortus proteins that induce proliferation and gamma-interferon secretion by CD4+ T cells from Brucella-vaccinated mice and delayed-type hypersensitivity in sensitized guinea pigs. Cell. Immunol. 172:262-268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Oliveira, S. C., and G. A. Splitter. 1994. Subcloning and expression of the Brucella abortus L7/L12 ribosomal gene and T-lymphocyte recognition of the recombinant protein. Infect. Immun. 62:5201-5204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Oliveira, S. C., and G. A. Splitter. 1995. CD8+ type 1 CD44hi CD45 RBlo T lymphocytes control intracellular Brucella abortus infection as demonstrated in major histocompatibility complex class I- and class II-deficient mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2551-2557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Oliveira, S. C., and G. A. Splitter. 1996. Immunization of mice with recombinant L7/L12 ribosomal protein confers protection against Brucella abortus infection. Vaccine 14:959-962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Olsen, S. C., N. F. Cheville, M. G. Stevens, H. H. Houng, E. S. Drazek, T. L. Hadfield, R. L. Warren, and D. L. Hoover. 1997. Lymphocyte proliferative responses of goats vaccinated with Brucella melitensis 16M or a purE201 strain. Infect. Immun. 65:2987-2991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ottones, F., J. Dornand, A. Naroeni, J. P. Liautard, and J. Favero. 2000. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells impair intracellular multiplication of Brucella suis in autologous monocytes through soluble factor release and contact-dependent cytotoxic effect. J. Immunol. 165:7133-7139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ottones, F., J. Liautard, A. Gross, F. Rabenoelina, J. P. Liautard, and J. Favero. 2000. Activation of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by a Brucella suis non-peptidic fraction impairs bacterial intracellular multiplication in monocytic infected cells. Immunology 100:252-258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Pavlov, H., M. Hogarth, I. F. McKenzie, and C. Cheers. 1982. In vivo and in vitro effects of monoclonal antibody to Ly antigens on immunity to infection. Cell. Immunol. 71:127-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Phillips, M., B. L. Deyoe, and P. C. Canning. 1989. Protection of mice against Brucella abortus infection by inoculation with monoclonal antibodies recognizing Brucella O-antigen. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50:2158-2161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Phillips, R. W., P. H. Elzer, G. T. Robertson, S. D. Hagius, J. V. Walker, M. B. Fatemi, F. M. Enright, and R. M. Roop, Jr. 1997. A Brucella melitensis high-temperature-requirement A (htrA) deletion mutant is attenuated in goats and protects against abortion. Res. Vet. Sci. 63:165-167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pizarro-Cerda, J., M. Desjardins, E. Moreno, S. Akira, and J. P. Gorvel. 1999. Modulation of endocytosis in nuclear factor IL-6(−/−) macrophages is responsible for a high susceptibility to intracellular bacterial infection. J. Immunol. 162:3519-3526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Pizarro-Cerda, J., S. Meresse, R. G. Parton, G. van der Goot, A. Sola-Landa, I. Lopez-Goni, E. Moreno, and J. P. Gorvel. 1998. Brucella abortus transits through the autophagic pathway and replicates in the endoplasmic reticulum of nonprofessional phagocytes. Infect. Immun. 66:5711-5724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Pizarro-Cerda, J., E. Moreno, M. Desjardins, and J. P. Gorvel. 1997. When intracellular pathogens invade the frontiers of cell biology and immunology. Histol. Histopathol. 12:1027-1038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Porte, F., J. P. Liautard, and S. Kohler. 1999. Early acidification of phagosomes containing Brucella suis is essential for intracellular survival in murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 67:4041-4047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Price, R. E., J. W. Templeton, and L. G. Adams. 1990. Survival of smooth, rough and transposon mutant strains of Brucella abortus in bovine mammary macrophages. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 26:353-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Rafie-Kolpin, M., R. C. Essenberg, and J. H. Wyckoff III. 1996. Identification and comparison of macrophage-induced proteins and proteins induced under various stress conditions in Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 64:5274-5283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Riley, L. K., and D. C. Robertson. 1984. Ingestion and intracellular survival of Brucella abortus in human and bovine polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infect. Immun. 46:224-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Rittig, M. G., M. T. Alvarez-Martinez, F. Porte, J. P. Liautard, and B. Rouot. 2001. Intracellular survival of Brucella spp. in human monocytes involves conventional uptake but special phagosomes. Infect. Immun. 69:3995-4006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Robertson, G. T., M. E. Kovach, C. A. Allen, T. A. Ficht, and R. M. Roop, Jr. 2000. The Brucella abortus Lon functions as a generalized stress response protease and is required for wild-type virulence in BALB/c mice. Mol. Microbiol. 35:577-588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Robertson, G. T., and R. M. Roop, Jr. 1999. The Brucella abortus host factor I (HF-I) protein contributes to stress resistance during stationary phase and is a major determinant of virulence in mice. Mol. Microbiol. 34:690-700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Robertson, M. 1998. Innate immunity: Curr. Biol. 8:R595-R597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Roop, R. M., Jr., T. W. Fletcher, N. M. Sriranganathan, S. M. Boyle, and G. G. Schurig. 1994. Identification of an immunoreactive Brucella abortus HtrA stress response protein homolog. Infect. Immun. 62:1000-1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Roop, R. M., Jr., R. W. Phillips, S. Hagius, J. V. Walker, N. J. Booth, W. Todd Fulton, M. D. Edmonds, and P. H. Elzer. 2001. Re-examination of the role of the Brucella melitensis HtrA stress response protease in virulence in pregnant goats. Vet. Microbiol. 82:91-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Rossetti, O. L., A. I. Arese, M. L. Boschiroli, and S. L. Cravero. 1996. Cloning of Brucella abortus gene and characterization of expressed 26-kilodalton periplasmic protein: potential use for diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:165-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Salmeron, I., M. Rodriguez-Zapata, O. Salmeron, L. Manzano, S. Vaquer, and M. Alvarez-Mon. 1992. Impaired activity of natural killer cells in patients with acute brucellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:764-770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Sanchez, D. O., R. O. Zandomeni, S. Cravero, R. E. Verdun, E. Pierrou, P. Faccio, G. Diaz, S. Lanzavecchia, F. Aguero, A. C. Frasch, et al. 2001. Gene discovery through genomic sequencing of Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 69:865-868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Sangari, F. J., and J. Aguero. 1996. Molecular basis of Brucella pathogenicity: an update. Microbiologia 12:207-218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Saunders, B. M., Z. Liu, Y. Zhan, and C. Cheers. 1993. Interleukin-6 production during chronic experimental infection. Immunol. Cell. Biol. 71:275-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Schurig, G. G., R. M. Roop, Jr., T. Bagchi, S. Boyle, D. Buhrman, and N. Sriranganathan. 1991. Biological properties of RB51; a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus. Vet. Microbiol. 28:171-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Sieira, R., D. J. Comerci, D. O. Sanchez, and R. A. Ugalde. 2000. A homologue of an operon required for DNA transfer in Agrobacterium is required in Brucella abortus for virulence and intracellular multiplication. J. Bacteriol. 182:4849-4855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Sola-Landa, A., J. Pizarro-Cerda, M. J. Grillo, E. Moreno, I. Moriyon, J. M. Blasco, J. P. Gorvel, and I. Lopez-Goni. 1998. A two-component regulatory system playing a critical role in plant pathogens and endosymbionts is present in Brucella abortus and controls cell invasion and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 29:125-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Stemshorn, B., K. Nielsen, and B. Samagh. 1981. The bovine immune response to Brucella abortus. III. Preparation of antisera against a Brucella component precipitated by sera of some infected cattle. Can. J. Comp. Med. 45:77-81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Stevens, M. G., S. C. Olsen, G. W. Pugh, Jr., and D. Brees. 1995. Comparison of immune responses and resistance to brucellosis in mice vaccinated with Brucella abortus 19 or RB51. Infect. Immun. 63:264-270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Stevens, M. G., S. C. Olsen, G. W. Pugh, and J. E. Mayfield. 1997. Role of immune responses to a GroEL heat shock protein in preventing brucellosis in mice vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain RB51. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:147-153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Stevens, M. G., S. C. Olsen, G. W. Pugh, Jr., and M. V. Palmer. 1994. Immune and pathologic responses in mice infected with Brucella abortus 19, RB51, or 2308. Infect. Immun. 62:3206-3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Stevens, M. G., L. B. Tabatabai, S. C. Olsen, and N. F. Cheville. 1994. Immune responses to superoxide dismutase and synthetic peptides of superoxide dismutase in cattle vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain 19 or RB51. Vet. Microbiol. 41:383-389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Tabatabai, L. B., and G. W. Pugh, Jr. 1994. Modulation of immune responses in Balb/c mice vaccinated with Brucella abortus Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase synthetic peptide vaccine. Vaccine 12:919-924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Tatum, F. M., P. G. Detilleux, J. M. Sacks, and S. M. Halling. 1992. Construction of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase deletion mutants of Brucella abortus: analysis of survival in vitro in epithelial and phagocytic cells and in vivo in mice. Infect. Immun. 60:2863-2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Teixeira-Gomes, A. P., A. Cloeckaert, G. Bezard, R. A. Bowden, G. Dubray, and M. S. Zygmunt. 1997. Identification and characterization of Brucella ovis immunogenic proteins using two-dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Electrophoresis 18:1491-1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Ugalde, J. E., C. Czibener, M. F. Feldman, and R. A. Ugalde. 2000. Identification and characterization of the Brucella abortus phosphoglucomutase gene: role of lipopolysaccharide in virulence and intracellular multiplication. Infect. Immun. 68:5716-5723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Van, M. D., G. A. Kennedy, S. C. Olsen, G. R. Hansen, and D. R. Ewalt. 1999. Brucellosis induced by RB51 vaccine in a pregnant heifer. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 215:1491-1493, 1449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Vemulapalli, R., A. J. Duncan, S. M. Boyle, N. Sriranganathan, T. E. Toth, and G. G. Schurig. 1998. Cloning and sequencing of yajC and secD homologs of Brucella abortus and demonstration of immune responses to YajC in mice vaccinated with B. abortus RB51. Infect. Immun. 66:5684-5691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Vizcaino, N., A. Cloeckaert, G. Dubray, and M. S. Zygmunt. 1996. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the gene coding for a ribosome releasing factor-homologous protein of Brucella melitensis. Infect. Immun. 64:4834-4837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Vizcaino, N., M. S. Zygmunt, J. M. Verger, M. Grayon, and A. Cloeckaert. 1997. Localization and characterization of a specific linear epitope of the Brucella DnaK protein. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 154:117-122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Winter, A. J., J. R. Duncan, C. G. Santisteban, J. T. Douglas, and L. G. Adams. 1989. Capacity of passively administered antibody to prevent establishment of Brucella abortus infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 57:3438-3444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Winter, A. J., G. G. Schurig, S. M. Boyle, N. Sriranganathan, J. A. Bevins, F. M. Enright, P. H. Elzer, and J. D. Kopec. 1996. Protection of BALB/c mice against homologous and heterologous species of Brucella by rough strain vaccines derived from Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis biovar 4. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57:677-683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Yabu, K., J. S. Youngner, D. S. Feingold, G. Keleti, and E. Gorelik. 1991. Augmentation of natural killer cell activity in mice by Bru-Pel. J. Immunother. 10:307-312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Young, E. J., M. Borchert, F. L. Kretzer, and D. M. Musher. 1985. Phagocytosis and killing of Brucella by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Infect. Dis. 151:682-690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Zaitseva, M., H. Golding, J. Manischewitz, D. Webb, and B. Golding. 1996. Brucella abortus as a potential vaccine candidate: induction of interleukin-12 secretion and enhanced B7.1 and B7.2 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 surface expression in elutriated human monocytes stimulated by heat-inactivated B. abortus. Infect. Immun. 64:3109-3117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Zhan, Y., and C. Cheers. 1993. Endogenous gamma interferon mediates resistance to Brucella abortus infection. Infect. Immun. 61:4899-4901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Zhan, Y., and C. Cheers. 1995. Endogenous interleukin-12 is involved in resistance to Brucella abortus infection. Infect. Immun. 63:1387-1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Zhan, Y., and C. Cheers. 1998. Control of IL-12 and IFN-γ production in response to live or dead bacteria by TNF and other factors. J. Immunol. 161:1447-1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Zhan, Y., A. Kelso, and C. Cheers. 1993. Cytokine production in the murine response to Brucella infection or immunization with antigenic extracts. Immunology 80:458-464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhan, Y., Z. Liu, and C. Cheers. 1996. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-12 contribute to resistance to the intracellular bacterium Brucella abortus by different mechanisms. Infect. Immun. 64:2782-2786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Zhan, Y. F., E. R. Stanley, and C. Cheers. 1991. Prophylaxis or treatment of experimental brucellosis with interleukin-1. Infect. Immun. 59:1790-1794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Zhu, Y., S. C. Oliveira, and G. A. Splitter. 1993. Isolation of Brucella abortus ssb and uvrA genes from a genomic library by use of lymphocytes as probes. Infect. Immun. 61:5339-5344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Zygmunt, M. S., F. B. Gilbert, and G. Dubray. 1992. Purification, characterization, and seroactivity of a 20-kilodalton Brucella protein antigen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2662-2667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]