Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1991 Mar 15;144(6):713–721.

Predictors of chlamydial infection and gonorrhea among patients seen by private practitioners.

J Vincelette 1, J G Baril 1, R Allard 1
PMCID: PMC1453048  PMID: 1900212

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictors of chlamydial infection and gonorrhea among patients tested by general practitioners. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: General private practice, family planning and abortion clinic, adolescent clinic, sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic and community health clinic in downtown Montreal. PATIENTS: The 2856 patients were included because of symptoms compatible with an STD, a history of sexual contact with a person known or suspected to have chlamydial infection, a history of a nonexclusive sexual relationship or presentation for an abortion. MEASURES: Patient information was obtained by the attending physician on a standard form. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for Chlamydia trachomatis and culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae were performed on cervical (female) or urethral (male) samples. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of infection. RESULTS: The EIA results were positive in 11.1% of the cases and the culture results in 2.3%. Among the males chlamydial infection was independently associated with low age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88 per year), heterosexuality (OR = 4.99), urethral discharge (OR = 3.74) and the absence of a history of gonorrhea (OR = 0.51). Gonorrhea was associated with urethral discharge (OR = 24.3) and homosexuality (OR = 3.68). Among the females chlamydial infection was associated with low age (OR = 0.79 per year), a history of sexual contact with a person known to have chlamydial infection (OR = 2.30), multiple sexual partners in the previous 12 months (OR = 1.60) and a reason for the test other than screening purposes (OR = 0.60). Gonorrhea was associated with a reason other than screening (OR = 0.24) and low age (OR = 0.74 per year). Among the patients tested for screening purposes age was the only significant predictor of chlamydial infection (OR = 0.79 per year), and the prevalence of gonorrhea was 0.4%. The actual rate of chlamydial infection was 11.8% among the patients younger than 25 years, 5.7% among those 25 to 34 years and 0.6% among those over 34. CONCLUSIONS: Age alone can be used as a criterion to screen for chlamydial infection among asymptomatic patients without a history of sexual contact with a person known or suspected to have such infection and with a history of a nonexclusive relationship. The prevalence in our population justifies screening people up to 34 years of age.

Full text

PDF
713

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allard R., Robert J., Turgeon P., Lepage Y. Predictors of asymptomatic gonorrhea among patients seen by private practitioners. CMAJ. 1985 Dec 1;133(11):1135-9, 1146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Estany A., Todd M., Vasquez M., McLaren R. Early detection of genital chlamydial infection in women: an economic evaluation. Sex Transm Dis. 1989 Jan-Mar;16(1):21–27. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198901000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Handsfield H. H., Jasman L. L., Roberts P. L., Hanson V. W., Kothenbeutel R. L., Stamm W. E. Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics. JAMA. 1986 Apr 4;255(13):1730–1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones R. B., Mammel J. B., Shepard M. K., Fisher R. R. Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endometrium of women at risk for chlamydial infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jul;155(1):35–39. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karam G. H., Martin D. H., Flotte T. R., Bonnarens F. O., Joseph J. R., Mroczkowski T. F., Johnson W. D. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections among sexually active men. J Infect Dis. 1986 Nov;154(5):900–903. doi: 10.1093/infdis/154.5.900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz B. P., Batteiger B. E., Jones R. B. Effect of prior sexually transmitted disease on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis. 1987 Jul-Sep;14(3):160–164. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198707000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levallois P., Rioux J. E., Côté L. Chlamydial infection among females attending an abortion clinic: prevalence and risk factors. CMAJ. 1987 Jul 1;137(1):33–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Louv W. C., Austin H., Perlman J., Alexander W. J. Oral contraceptive use and the risk of chlamydial and gonococcal infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;160(2):396–402. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90456-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Magder L. S., Harrison H. R., Ehret J. M., Anderson T. S., Judson F. N. Factors related to genital Chlamydia trachomatis and its diagnosis by culture in a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;128(2):298–308. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCormack W. M., Rosner B., McComb D. E., Evrard J. R., Zinner S. H. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in female college students. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jan;121(1):107–115. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Phillips R. S., Aronson M. D., Taylor W. C., Safran C. Should tests for Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection be done during routine gynecologic visits? An analysis of the costs of alternative strategies. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Aug;107(2):188–194. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Phillips R. S., Hanff P. A., Holmes M. D., Wertheimer A., Aronson M. D. Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynecologic care: criteria for selective testing. Am J Med. 1989 May;86(5):515–520. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90377-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Podgore J. K., Holmes K. K., Alexander E. R. Asymptomatic urethral infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis in male U.S. military personnel. J Infect Dis. 1982 Dec;146(6):828–828. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quinn T. C., Warfield P., Kappus E., Barbacci M., Spence M. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an inner-city population: a comparison of diagnostic methods. J Infect Dis. 1985 Aug;152(2):419–423. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.2.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schachter J., Cles L. D., Ray R. M., Hesse F. E. Is there immunity to chlamydial infections of the human genital tract? Sex Transm Dis. 1983 Jul-Sep;10(3):123–125. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198307000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schachter J., Stoner E., Moncada J. Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics. West J Med. 1983 Mar;138(3):375–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shafer M. A., Prager V., Shalwitz J., Vaughan E., Moscicki B., Brown R., Wibbelsman C., Schachter J. Prevalence of urethral Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among asymptomatic, sexually active adolescent boys. J Infect Dis. 1987 Jul;156(1):223–224. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.1.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stamm W. E., Koutsky L. A., Benedetti J. K., Jourden J. L., Brunham R. C., Holmes K. K. Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infections in men. Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical manifestations. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):47–51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson S. E., Washington A. E. Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Epidemiol Rev. 1983;5:96–123. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trachtenberg A. I., Washington A. E., Halldorson S. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jan;71(1):101–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Washington A. E., Johnson R. E., Sanders L. L., Jr Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States. What are they costing us? JAMA. 1987 Apr 17;257(15):2070–2072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES