Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference in the quality of life between elderly patients managed in a day hospital and those receiving conventional care. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; assessment upon entry to study and at 3, 6 and 12 months afterward. SETTING: Geriatrician referral-based secondary care. PATIENTS: A total of 113 consecutively referred elderly patients with deteriorating functional status believed to have rehabilitation potential; 55 were assessed and treated by an interdisciplinary team in a day hospital (treatment group), and 58 were assessed in an inpatient unit or an outpatient clinic or were discharged early with appropriate community services (control group). OUTCOME MEASURES: Barthel Index, Rand Questionnaire, Global Health Question and Geriatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQLQ). MAIN RESULTS: Eight study subjects and four control subjects died; the difference was insignificant. Functional status deteriorated over time in the two groups; although the difference was not significant there was less deterioration in the control group. The GQLQ scores indicated no significant difference between the two groups in the ability to perform daily living activities and in the alleviation of symptoms over time but did show a trend favouring the control group. The GQLQ scores did indicate a significant difference in favour of the control group in the effect of treatment on emotions (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The care received at the day hospital did not improve functional status or quality of life of elderly patients as compared with the otherwise excellent geriatric outpatient care.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Eagle D. J., Guyatt G., Patterson C., Turpie I. Day hospitals' cost and effectiveness: a summary. Gerontologist. 1987 Dec;27(6):735–740. doi: 10.1093/geront/27.6.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gresham G. E., Phillips T. F., Labi M. L. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Aug;61(8):355–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guyatt G. H., Bombardier C., Tugwell P. X. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986 Apr 15;134(8):889–895. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirshner B., Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart A. L., Hays R. D., Ware J. E., Jr The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724–735. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker M. A., Davison J. G., Ogle S. J. Day hospital rehabilitation--effectiveness and cost in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1209–1212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weissert W., Wan T., Livieratos B., Katz S. Effects and costs of day-care services for the chronically ill: a randomized experiment. Med Care. 1980 Jun;18(6):567–584. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198006000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]