Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1987 Jun;61(2):159–165.

Functional heterogeneity of CD4+ T lymphocytes: two subpopulations with counteracting immunoregulatory functions identified with the monoclonal antibodies WR16 and WR19.

K Moore, A M Nesbitt
PMCID: PMC1453371  PMID: 2954898

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) WR16 and WR19 bound to 47% and 43% of CD4+ tonsil T lymphocytes, respectively. WR16 immunoprecipitated a 220,000 molecular weight (MW) component that was also expressed on CD8+ lymphocytes and on B lymphocytes, whereas binding of WR19 was restricted to CD4+ lymphocytes. Binding of these two MoAbs on freshly prepared tonsil CD4+ T lymphocytes was mutually exclusive, and they were used to prepare reciprocal CD4+ subpopulations by negative depletion using the panning technique. Recombination of subsets isolated in this way with autologous B lymphocytes activated with pokeweed mitogen demonstrated that WR16+/OKT4+ lymphocytes suppressed B lymphocyte Ig secretion, whereas WR19+/OKT4+ lymphocytes helped B lymphocyte Ig secretion. Removal of WR16+ cells from a CD4+ helper cell population enhanced B lymphocyte Ig secretion rate, whilst the re-addition of WR16+ cells to WR19+ helper cells reduced B lymphocyte Ig secretion rates to that seen with non-fractionated CD4+ helper cells. The overall level of helper activity induced by a given CD4+ population was thus a consequence of an interaction between WR19+ helper cells and WR16+ suppressor cells. The WR16+ subset of CD4+ cells exhibited a greater proliferation rate than WR19+/CD4+ cells in response to mitogen. Proliferation of negatively selected WR16+/CD4+ lymphocytes was inhibited by pretreatment with WR16, which also induced a concomitant increase in the level of suppressor activity of these cells. Expression of the antigens identified by these two MoAbs was not constant as phytohaemagglutinin activation of T lymphocytes induced a loss of WR16 binding with a simultaneous increase in the level of WR19 bound/cell and in the proportion of WR19+ cells. T lymphocyte clones selected from a normal population were composed of a disproportionately high number positive for WR19 and negative for WR16. These data indicated that the absence of the WR19 antigen on WR16+ cells may be transient as the antigen was acquired by the majority of CD4+ T lymphocytes after activation. These two MoAbs may therefore be used to predict the functional status of a heterogeneous population of CD4+ lymphocytes and may also prove to be of use in the study of CD4+ T lymphocyte activation.

Full text

PDF
159

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blue M. L., Daley J. F., Levine H., Craig K. A., Schlossman S. F. Biosynthesis and surface expression of T8 by peripheral blood T4+ cells in vitro. J Immunol. 1986 Aug 15;137(4):1202–1207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corte G., Mingari M. C., Moretta A., Damiani G., Moretta L., Bargellesi A. Human T cell subpopulations defined by a monoclonal antibody. I. A small subset is responsible for proliferation to allogeneic cells or to soluble antigens and for helper activity for B cell differentiation. J Immunol. 1982 Jan;128(1):16–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein H., Volkman D. J., Ambrus J. L., Jr, Fauci A. S. Characterization of a T4+/Leu-8+ T cell clone that directly helps B cell Ig production by secreting B cell differentiation factor. J Immunol. 1985 Jul;135(1):339–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Janossy G., Prentice H. G. T cell subpopulations, monoclonal antibodies and their therapeutic applications. Clin Haematol. 1982 Oct;11(3):631–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kansas G. S., Wood G. S., Fishwild D. M., Engleman E. G. Functional characterization of human T lymphocyte subsets distinguished by monoclonal anti-leu-8. J Immunol. 1985 May;134(5):2995–3002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ledbetter J. A., Rose L. M., Spooner C. E., Beatty P. G., Martin P. J., Clark E. A. Antibodies to common leukocyte antigen p220 influence human T cell proliferation by modifying IL 2 receptor expression. J Immunol. 1985 Sep;135(3):1819–1825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moore K., Nesbitt A. M. Identification and isolation of OKT4+ suppressor cells with the monoclonal antibody WR16. Immunology. 1986 Aug;58(4):659–664. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morimoto C., Letvin N. L., Boyd A. W., Hagan M., Brown H. M., Kornacki M. M., Schlossman S. F. The isolation and characterization of the human helper inducer T cell subset. J Immunol. 1985 Jun;134(6):3762–3769. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morimoto C., Letvin N. L., Distaso J. A., Aldrich W. R., Schlossman S. F. The isolation and characterization of the human suppressor inducer T cell subset. J Immunol. 1985 Mar;134(3):1508–1515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pawelec G., Schneider E. M., Wernet P. Acquisition of suppressive activity and natural killer-like cytotoxicity by human alloproliferative "helper" T cell clones. J Immunol. 1986 Jan;136(2):402–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Walsh F. S., Crumpton M. J. Orientation of cell-surface antigens in the lipid bilayer of lymphocyte plasma membrane. Nature. 1977 Sep 22;269(5626):307–311. doi: 10.1038/269307a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zagury D., Bernard J., Morgan D. A., Fouchard M., Feldman M. Phenotypic diversity within clones of human normal T cells. Int J Cancer. 1983 Jun 15;31(6):705–710. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910310605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES