Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1987 Oct;62(2):315–319.

In vivo studies on allotolerance perimetamorphically induced in control and thymectomized Xenopus.

J C Arnall 1, J D Horton 1
PMCID: PMC1453976  PMID: 2960613

Abstract

Implantation of either major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-disparate thymus to 7-day thymectomized (Tx) Xenopus in late larval life, or allogeneic skin to perimetamorphic controls, routinely induces tolerance towards implant-strain skin grafts applied in adult life. To characterize this allotolerance further, additional in vivo approaches were attempted. Injection of gamma-irradiated (5000 rads) implant-strain splenocytes into frogs bearing tolerant skin grafts revealed (within 3 days) significantly elevated tritiated thymidine uptake by host spleen cells, compared to siblings injected with isogeneic cells. Although this in vivo 'mixed leucocyte reaction' proved to be thymus dependent, the identity of the cells involved awaits clarification. When non-restored Tx Xenopus are injected with live MHC-disparate splenocytes, graft-versus-host (GVH)-induced mortality ensued within 2 weeks. Such GVH disease also occurred (albeit more chronically) when Tx allothymus-implanted animals were given MHC-incompatible splenocytes, but only when these came from the thymus donor strain. Splenocytes from thymus-implanted animals failed to achieve GVH-induced splenomegaly when transferred to appropriate hosts (bearing MHC antigens of the thymus donor strain). Overall, the experiments indicate that alloreactivity against donor cells is impaired but not completely inhibited in Xenopus following perimetamorphic implantation.

Full text

PDF
315

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnall J. C., Horton J. D. Impaired rejection of minor-histocompatibility-antigen-disparate skin grafts and acquisition of tolerance to thymus donor antigens in allothymus-implanted, thymectomized Xenopus. Transplantation. 1986 Jun;41(6):766–776. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198606000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark J. C., Newth D. R. Immunological activity of transplanted spleens in Xenopus laevis. Experientia. 1972 Aug 15;28(8):951–953. doi: 10.1007/BF01924967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flajnik M. F., Du Pasquier L., Cohen N. Immune responses of thymus/lymphocyte embryonic chimeras: studies on tolerance and major histocompatibility complex restriction in Xenopus. Eur J Immunol. 1985 Jun;15(6):540–547. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830150603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flajnik M. F., Kaufman J. F., Riegert P., Du Pasquier L. Identification of class I major histocompatibility complex encoded molecules in the amphibian Xenopus. Immunogenetics. 1984;20(4):433–442. doi: 10.1007/BF00345617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horton J. D., Manning M. J. Response to skin allografts in Xenopus laevis following thymectomy at early stages of lymphoid organ maturation. Transplantation. 1972 Aug;14(2):141–154. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197208000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horton J. D., Russ J. H., Aitchison P., Horton T. L. Thymocyte/stromal cell chimaerism in allothymus-grafted Xenopus: developmental studies using the X. borealis fluorescence marker. Development. 1987 May;100(1):107–117. doi: 10.1242/dev.100.1.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hsu E., Julius M. H., Du Pasquier L. Effector and regulator functions of splenic and thymic lymphocytes in the clawed toad Xenopus. Ann Immunol (Paris) 1983 Nov-Dec;134D(3):277–292. doi: 10.1016/s0769-2625(83)80022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaufman J. F., Flajnik M. F., Du Pasquier L., Riegert P. Xenopus MHC class II molecules. I. Identification and structural characterization. J Immunol. 1985 May;134(5):3248–3257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaye C., Tompkins R. Allograft rejection in Xenopus laevis following larval thymectomy. Dev Comp Immunol. 1983 Spring;7(2):287–294. doi: 10.1016/0145-305x(83)90010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kindred B. Lymphocytes which differentiate in an allogeneic thymus. I. Response to MLC determinants and skin grafts from the thymus donor strain. Cell Immunol. 1976 Aug;25(2):189–196. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lancaster F., Chui Y. L., Batchelor J. R. Anti-idiotypic T cells suppress rejection of renal allografts in rats. Nature. 1985 May 23;315(6017):336–337. doi: 10.1038/315336a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagata S., Cohen N. Specific in vivo and nonspecific in vitro alloreactivities of adult frogs (Xenopus laevis) that were thymectomized during early larval life. Eur J Immunol. 1983 Jul;13(7):541–545. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830130705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nakamura T. Lethal graft-versus-host reaction induced by parental cells in the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. Transplantation. 1985 Oct;40(4):393–397. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198510000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES