Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1984 Jul;52(3):519–523.

Anchorage and lymphocyte function. Antibodies as adhesion and spreading factors for human T lymphocytes.

L Wanger, P Otteskog, K G Sundqvist
PMCID: PMC1454480  PMID: 6611298

Abstract

When attached to a solid surface coated with protein A various antibodies reacting with lymphocyte membrane antigens (anti-beta 2m, OKT3, OKT8, Leu2, 3, 4 and certain patient sera) catalyse the formation of peripheral lamellar activity, i.e. an active spreading process in human T lymphocytes. In contrast, binding only of the same antibodies to the cells or allowing antibody-coated cells to settle and bind to a protein A-coated surface did not induce spreading although the number of cells attached to the solid surface was virtually the same as in the former case. The peripheral lamellar activity markedly facilitated short-range lymphocyte interactions and appeared to constitute the region of the lymphocyte that actively contacts other cells. These results show that antibodies can act as spreading factors, and indicate that this function is critically dependent on the presentation of the inducing ligand. The asymmetry in the induction of active cell edges may influence functional lymphocyte interactions with environmental surfaces.

Full text

PDF
519

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berke G., Hu V., McVey E., Clark W. R. T lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. I. A common mechanism for target recognition in specific and lectin-dependent cytolysis. J Immunol. 1981 Aug;127(2):776–781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harris A., Dunn G. Centripetal transport of attached particles on both surfaces of moving fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Aug;73(2):519–523. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Otteskog P., Friskopp J., Sundqvist K. G. Morphology and microfilament organization in human blood lymphocytes. II. Development of substrate-attached projections in T lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Jan;137(1):111–119. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Otteskog P., Sundqvist K. G. Anchorage and lymphocyte function. Spreading-capacity distinguishes common thymocytes and peripheral T lymphocytes. Immunology. 1983 Apr;48(4):675–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rajaraman R., Rounds D. E., Yen S. P., Rembaum A. A scanning electron microscope study of cell adhesion and spreading in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Oct;88(2):327–339. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90248-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sundqvist K. G., Otteskog P., Wanger L., Thorstensson R., Utter G. Morphology and microfilament organization in human blood lymphocytes. Effects of substratum and mitogen exposure. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Dec;130(2):327–337. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vasiliev J. M., Gelfand I. M. Mechanism of non-adhesiveness of endothelial and epithelial surfaces. Nature. 1978 Aug 17;274(5672):710–711. doi: 10.1038/274710a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES