Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1985 Jan;54(1):65–70.

Suppression in Xenopus laevis: thymus inducer, spleen effector cells.

L N Ruben, A Buenafe, S Oliver, A Malley, K Barr, D Lukas
PMCID: PMC1454854  PMID: 3156089

Abstract

Studies were carried out on suppressor function in the amphibian Xenopus laevis, the South African clawed toad. Suppression by the thymus of haemagglutinin (HA) production by spleen is antigen-dependent, partially specific and not MHC-restricted in this species (Ruben, Buenafe & Seivert, 1983). Three questions were considered in this study. Does the thymus effect suppression by stimulating peripheralized spleen effector cells, or do effector cells reside within the thymus? Do macrophages participate in the induction and/or expression of thymus-dependent suppressor function? Can thymus suppressor and helper functions be distinguished by using irradiation treatment? The capacity of immunized thymus to suppress HA when co-cultured with spleen fragments from immunized, cyclophosphamide (CyP)-injected animals was tested. Immunized thymus failed to suppress the high levels of HA production by spleen fragments from CyP-treated, immunized donors. Colloidal carbon injection resulted in blockade of macrophage function, and both the capacity of thymuses to suppress and of spleens to be suppressed in co-cultures. Finally, the effect of thymus exposure to gamma-irradiation in vitro was tested using autogeneic thymus/spleen combinations. This enabled the visualization of thymic helper function, which is MHC-restricted in Xenopus (Bernard et al., 1981). Four dosages of irradiation were tested after antigen challenge. The highest HA titres were produced by spleen co-cultures with thymuses which had received 1000 rads. We conclude that suppression of HA production in spleen is not the result of thymus suppressor effector cells, but that suppressor function is mediated by thymus inducer cells which stimulate suppressor effectors in spleen. Both the thymic inducers and effectors in the spleen are sensitive to CyP and macrophage blockade. Our studies further suggest that we are able to distinguish between the thymic functions of help and suppression in Xenopus by taking advantage of their differential sensitivities to irradiation. While it has been postulated, on other grounds, that suppression was one of the earliest thymic regulatory functions to have evolved (L.N. Ruben & R.H. Clothier, submitted), here we suggest the presence of sequential activities of more than one cellular subset, as early in evolution as the primitive anuran (tail-less) amphibia.

Full text

PDF
65

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. E., Warner N. L. Ionizing radiation and the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1976;24:215–335. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60331-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aoki I., Minami M., Dorf M. E. A mechanism responsible for the induction of H-2 restricted second order suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1983 Jun 1;157(6):1726–1735. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.6.1726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auerbach R., Ruben L. N. Studies of antibody formation in Xenopus laevis. J Immunol. 1970 May;104(5):1242–1246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernard C. C., Bordmann G., Blomberg B., Du Pasquier L. Genetic control of T helper cell function in the clawed toad Xenopus laevis. Eur J Immunol. 1981 Feb;11(2):151–155. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830110217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clothier R. H., James H. S., Ruben L. N., Balls M. Lectins and substitution for helper function in anti-hapten responses in Xenopus laevis. Immunology. 1984 Aug;52(4):703–709. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gruenewald D. A., Ruben L. N. The effect of adult thymectomy upon helper function in Xenopus laevis, the South African clawed toad. Immunology. 1979 Sep;38(1):191–194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Janeway C. A., Jr Cellular cooperation during in vivo anti-hapten antibody responses. II. The effect of in vivo and in vitro x-irradiation on T and B cells. J Immunol. 1975 Apr;114(4):1402–1407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malley A., Dresser D. W. Regulation of timothy grass pollen IgE antibody formation. I. In-vitro induction of suppressor T cells by soluble T suppressor factors. Immunology. 1983 Jul;49(3):463–469. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruben L. N., Clothier R. H., Buenafe A., Needham P., James H. S., Balls M. In vitro thymus suppression of hemagglutinin production in Xenopus laevis: location, drug and temperature sensitivity. Thymus. 1984;6(3):143–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ruben L. N., Stack J. Limitations in response capacity of the newt, Notophthalmus viridescens, to soluble and particulate antigens. Dev Comp Immunol. 1982 Summer;6(3):491–498. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(82)80035-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tada T., Okumura K. The role of antigen-specific T cell factors in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1979;28:1–87. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60799-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES