Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb;172(2):1191–1198. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049395

TABLE 3.

Segregation of S-haplotypes following self-pollination of six sour cherry selections to determine the functionality of each S-haplotype

Parent (S-genotype)
No. of progeny observed
Segregation of S-haplotypes
S-haplotype Observed ratio Expected ratioa χ2 (P-value)
RS 54 S6 28:26 1:1 0.07 (0.7855)
(S6S13′S26Sa) S13′ 54:0 1:1 54.0 (<0.0001)
S26 23:31 1:1 1.19 (0.2763)
Sa 54:0 1:1 54.0 (<0.0001)
Cigány 59 S6m2 59:0 1:1 59.0 (<0.0001)
(S6m2S9S26Sa) S9 24:35 1:1 2.05 (0.1521)
S26 36:23 1:1 2.86 (0.0906)
Sa 59:0 1:1 59.0 (<0.0001)
EB 25 S4 9:16 1:1 1.96 (0.1615)
(S4S6mSaSnull) S6m 25:0 1:1 25.0 (<0.0001)
Sa 20:5 1:1 9.00 (0.0027)
Sure 64 S4 35:29 1:1 0.56 (0.4533)
(S4S13′SaSnull) S13′ 64:0 1:1 64.0 (<0.0001)
Sa 63:1 1:1 60.1 (<0.0001)
UF 102 S1′ 102:0 1:1 102.0 (<0.0001)
(S1′S4SdSnull) S4 60:42 1:1 3.18 (0.0747)
Sd 98:4 1:1 86.6 (<0.0001)
Mont 135 S6 72:63 1:1 0.60 (0.4386)
(S6S13′SaSnull) S13′ 131:4 1:1 119.4 (<0.0001)
Sa 131:4 1:1 119.4 (<0.0001)
a

A 1:1 ratio is expected if the shared S-haplotype is fully functional, resulting in pollen rejection. A shared nonfunctional S-haplotype would not result in pollen rejection; therefore, the shared S-haplotype would be transmitted to the progeny at a higher frequency than expected.