TABLE 4.
Growth
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25° | 30° | 37° | Suppression at HO-lacZ
|
||
swi6: | + | ++ | ++ | ||
Tail domain | |||||
SWI6 sin4 | + | + | − | ||
swi6 sin4 | +/− | +/− | − | + | |
SWI6 pgd1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 pgd1 | (+) | + | (+) | + | |
SWI6 gal11 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 gal11 | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | |
Middle domain | |||||
SWI6 nut1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 nut1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | |
SWI6 med1 | + | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 med1 | + | + | (+) | + | |
SWI6 med9 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 med9 | (+) | (+) | (+) | + | |
SWI6 srb7 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb7 | ++ | ++ | (+) | + | |
Kinase complex | |||||
SWI6 srb8 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb8 | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
SWI6 srb9 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb9 | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
SWI6 srb10 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb10 | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | |
SWI6 srb11 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb11 | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
Head domain | |||||
SWI6 srb2 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 srb2 | +/− | +/− | +/− | ND | |
SWI6 srb5 | + | + | + | ||
swi6 srb5 | +/− | +/− | +/− | ND | |
SWI6 rox3 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
swi6 rox3 | ++ | ++ | ++ | + |
The growth phenotypes of mediator subunit mutants in a swi6 background grown on YEPD plates were scored from best to worst as follows: ++, +, (+), +/−, −. ND, not determined. The suppression phenotype of each double mutant is indicated as “+” if the mediator defect restores HO-lacZ expression on the basis of the X-Gal filter assay described in materials and methods.