Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Feb 15;24(4):707–712. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.4.707

The thermal stability of DNA fragments with tandem mismatches at a d(CXYG).d(CY'X'G) site.

S H Ke 1, R M Wartell 1
PMCID: PMC145693  PMID: 8604314

Abstract

Temperature-Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (TGGE) was employed to determine the thermal stabilities of 28 DNA fragments, 373 bp long, with two adjacent mismatched base pairs, and eight DNAs with Watson-Crick base pairs at the same positions. Heteroduplex DNAs containing two adjacent mismatches were formed by melting and reannealing pairs of homologous 373 bp DNA fragments differing by two adjacent base pairs. Product DNAs were separated based on their thermal stability by parallel and perpendicular TGGE. The polyacrylamide gel contained 3.36 M urea and 19.2 % formamide to lower the DNA melting temperatures. The order of stability was determined in the sequence context d(CXYG).d(CY'X'G) where X.X' and Y.Y" represent the mismatched or Watson-Crick base pairs. The identity of the mismatched bases and their stacking interactions influence DNA stability. Mobility transition melting temperatures (T u) of the DNAs with adjacent mismatches were 1.0-3.6 degrees C (+/-0.2 degree C) lower than the homoduplex DNA with the d(CCAG).d(CTGG) sequence. Two adjacent G.A pairs, d(CGAG).d(CGAG), created a more stable DNA than DNAs with Watson-Crick A.T pairs at the same sites. The d(GA).d(GA) sequence is estimated to be 0.4 (+/-30%) kcal/mol more stable in free energy than d(AA).d(TT) base pairs. This result confirms the unusual stability of the d(GA).d(GA) sequence previously observed in DNA oligomers. All other DNAs with adjacent mismatched base pairs were less stable than Watson-Crick homoduplex DNAs. Their relative stabilities followed an order expected from previous results on single mismatches. Two homoduplex DNAs with identical nearest neighbor sequences but different next-nearest neighbor sequences had a small but reproducible difference in T u value. This result indicates that sequence dependent next neighbor stacking interactions influence DNA stability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboul-ela F., Koh D., Tinoco I., Jr, Martin F. H. Base-base mismatches. Thermodynamics of double helix formation for dCA3XA3G + dCT3YT3G (X, Y = A,C,G,T). Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Jul 11;13(13):4811–4824. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.13.4811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng J. W., Chou S. H., Reid B. R. Base pairing geometry in GA mismatches depends entirely on the neighboring sequence. J Mol Biol. 1992 Dec 20;228(4):1037–1041. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chou S. H., Cheng J. W., Reid B. R. Solution structure of [d(ATGAGCGAATA)]2. Adjacent G:A mismatches stabilized by cross-strand base-stacking and BII phosphate groups. J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 5;228(1):138–155. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90497-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delcourt S. G., Blake R. D. Stacking energies in DNA. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 15;266(23):15160–15169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ebel S., Lane A. N., Brown T. Very stable mismatch duplexes: structural and thermodynamic studies on tandem G.A mismatches in DNA. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 8;31(48):12083–12086. doi: 10.1021/bi00163a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaffney B. L., Jones R. A. Thermodynamic comparison of the base pairs formed by the carcinogenic lesion O6-methylguanine with reference both to Watson-Crick pairs and to mismatched pairs. Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 11;28(14):5881–5889. doi: 10.1021/bi00440a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greene K. L., Jones R. L., Li Y., Robinson H., Wang A. H., Zon G., Wilson W. D. Solution structure of a GA mismatch DNA sequence, d(CCATGAATGG)2, determined by 2D NMR and structural refinement methods. Biochemistry. 1994 Feb 8;33(5):1053–1062. doi: 10.1021/bi00171a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kan L. S., Chandrasegaran S., Pulford S. M., Miller P. S. Detection of a guanine X adenine base pair in a decadeoxyribonucleotide by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4263–4265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ke S. H., Wartell R. M. Influence of nearest neighbor sequence on the stability of base pair mismatches in long DNA; determination by temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Nov 11;21(22):5137–5143. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.22.5137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ke S. H., Wartell R. M. Influence of neighboring base pairs on the stability of single base bulges and base pairs in a DNA fragment. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 11;34(14):4593–4600. doi: 10.1021/bi00014a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lane A., Martin S. R., Ebel S., Brown T. Solution conformation of a deoxynucleotide containing tandem G.A mismatched base pairs and 3'-overhanging ends in d(GTGAACTT)2. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 8;31(48):12087–12095. doi: 10.1021/bi00163a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LeBlanc D. A., Morden K. M. Thermodynamic characterization of deoxyribooligonucleotide duplexes containing bulges. Biochemistry. 1991 Apr 23;30(16):4042–4047. doi: 10.1021/bi00230a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lerman L. S., Fischer S. G., Hurley I., Silverstein K., Lumelsky N. Sequence-determined DNA separations. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1984;13:399–423. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.13.060184.002151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Y., Zon G., Wilson W. D. NMR and molecular modeling evidence for a G.A mismatch base pair in a purine-rich DNA duplex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jan 1;88(1):26–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Y., Zon G., Wilson W. D. Thermodynamics of DNA duplexes with adjacent G.A mismatches. Biochemistry. 1991 Jul 30;30(30):7566–7572. doi: 10.1021/bi00244a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maskos K., Gunn B. M., LeBlanc D. A., Morden K. M. NMR study of G.A and A.A pairing in (dGCGAATAAGCG)2. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 13;32(14):3583–3595. doi: 10.1021/bi00065a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikonowicz E. P., Meadows R. P., Fagan P., Gorenstein D. G. NMR structural refinement of a tandem G.A mismatched decamer d(CCAAGATTGG)2 via the hybrid matrix procedure. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 5;30(5):1323–1334. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Privé G. G., Heinemann U., Chandrasegaran S., Kan L. S., Kopka M. L., Dickerson R. E. Helix geometry, hydration, and G.A mismatch in a B-DNA decamer. Science. 1987 Oct 23;238(4826):498–504. doi: 10.1126/science.3310237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tatti K. M., Moran C. P., Jr Utilization of one promoter by two forms of RNA polymerase from Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1985 Mar 14;314(6007):190–192. doi: 10.1038/314190a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wartell R. M., Hosseini S. H., Moran C. P., Jr Detecting base pair substitutions in DNA fragments by temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 11;18(9):2699–2705. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.9.2699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Werntges H., Steger G., Riesner D., Fritz H. J. Mismatches in DNA double strands: thermodynamic parameters and their correlation to repair efficiencies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 May 12;14(9):3773–3790. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.9.3773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu M., McDowell J. A., Turner D. H. A periodic table of symmetric tandem mismatches in RNA. Biochemistry. 1995 Mar 14;34(10):3204–3211. doi: 10.1021/bi00010a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES