Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1979 Jan;36(1):71–79.

Peripheral blood leucocyte response to coccidial infection: a comparison of the response in rats and chickens and its correlation with resistance to reinfection.

M E Rose, P Hesketh, B M Ogilvie
PMCID: PMC1457377  PMID: 84786

Abstract

The peripheral blood leucocyte (PBL) response to infection with two species of the intestinal protozoan Eimeria shows a remarkably similar pattern in both rats and chickens. Like resistance to these parasites, the PBL response to reinfection is species-specific and it coincides with the inhibition of development of the parasite and with cellular infiltration of the lamina propria. In primary infections, the numbers of PBL increased biphasically and significant changes were found in the count of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN), lymphocytes, and large mononuclear cells (LMN). A consistent pattern of two increases in PMN, some lymphopenia, and two increases in LMN was found in rats and chickens. The response to secondary infections was more rapid and much briefer, particularly in chickens in which significant changes were detected within hours of infection and consisted of an almost equal increase in PMN and in lymphocytes. This secondary response occurred only in animals challenged with the homologous species. It was not evoked by challenge with a related species which develops in approximately the same area of the intestine.

Full text

PDF
71

Images in this article

77Figure 7
on p.77

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davis P. J., Parry S. H., Porter P. The role of secretory IgA in anti-coccidial immunity in the chicken. Immunology. 1978 May;34(5):879–888. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huff D., Clark D. T. Cellular aspects of the resistance of chickens to Eimeria tenella infections. J Protozool. 1970 Feb;17(1):35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1970.tb05156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liburd E. M., Armstrong W. D., Mahrt J. L. Immunity to the protozoan parasite Eimeria nieschulzi in inbred CD-F rats. Cell Immunol. 1973 Jun;7(3):444–452. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(73)90208-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liburd E. M. Eimeria nieschulzi infections in inbred and outbread rats: infective dose, route of infection, and host resistance. Can J Zool. 1973 Feb;51(2):273–279. doi: 10.1139/z73-039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. NATT M. P. The effect of cecal coccidiosis on the blood cells of the domestic fowl. 3. The changes in the leukocyte picture during the course of the infection. Exp Parasitol. 1959 Apr;8(2):182–187. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(59)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Orlans E., Rose M. E. An IgA-like immunoglobulin in the fowl. Immunochemistry. 1972 Aug;9(8):833–838. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(72)90262-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rommel M., Heydorn A. O. Versuche zur Ubertragung der Immunität gegen Eimeria-Infektionen durch Lymphozyten. Z Parasitenkd. 1971;36(3):242–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rose M. E., Hesketh P. Immunity to coccidiosis: stages of the life-cycle of Eimeria maxima which induce, and are affected by, the response of the host. Parasitology. 1976 Aug;73(1):25–57. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000051295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rose M. E. Immune responses in infections with coccidia: macrophage activity. Infect Immun. 1974 Oct;10(4):862–871. doi: 10.1128/iai.10.4.862-871.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rose M. E. Immunity to coccidiosis: maternal transfer in Eimeria maxima infections. Parasitology. 1972 Oct;65(2):273–282. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000045054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rose M. E. Immunity to coccidiosis: protective effect of transferred serum in Eimeria maxima infections. Parasitology. 1971 Feb;62(1):11–25. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000071249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rose M. E., Lee D. L. Interactions in vitro between sporozoites of Eimeria tenella and host peritoneal exudate cells: electron microscopal observations. Z Parasitenkd. 1977 Dec 13;54(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00380632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rose M. E., Long P. L. Immunity to coccidiosis: protective effects of transferred serum and cells investigated in chick embryos infected with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology. 1971 Oct;63(2):299–313. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000079610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rose M. E. The early development of immunity to Eimeria maxima in comparison with that to Eimeria tenella. Parasitology. 1974 Feb;68(1):35–45. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000045352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES