Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1978 Nov;35(5):721–731.

Distinction between suppressors of the delayed-type hypersensitivity and the humoral response to sheep erythrocytes.

K Yamaguchi, S Kishimoto
PMCID: PMC1457542  PMID: 309853

Abstract

Suppressors for both delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and the humoral immune response could be simultaneously induced in the spleens of mice by immunization with a high dose of SRBC. Normal recipient mice of the spleen cells from donors immunized 5 days previously elicited depressed DTH or humoral response when immunized with SRBC. The suppressive activity was found to reside in T not B enriched fraction. Four hundred rad irradiation of the primed spleen cells resulted in complete loss of DTH suppressor activity, but only in some reduction of the suppressor activity for the humoral response. In contrast, hydrocortisone treatment of the donor mice caused no loss of DTH suppressor activity while approximately half of the suppressive activity for anti-SRBC PFC response was lost. Adult thymectomy prevented completely the induction of the DTH suppressor in contrast to little loss of the suppressor activity for the humoral response. DTH suppression was antigen-specific for the induction, but nonspecific for the expression. However the suppression of the humoral response was antigen-specific not only for the induction but also for the expression. In addition, DTH suppressor was capable of suppressing both the induction and expression of DTH while the humoral response was suppressed only in the induction stage by the suppressor.

Full text

PDF
721

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asherson G. L., Zembala M., Mayhew B., Goldstein A. Adult thymectomy prevention of the appearance of suppressor T cells which depress contact sensitivity to picryl chloride and reversal of adult thymectomy effect by thymus extract. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Oct;6(10):699–703. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830061008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basten A., Miller J. F., Johnson P. T cell-dependent suppression of an anti-hapten antibody response. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:130–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cantor H., Boyse E. A. Functional subclasses of T lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. II. Cooperation between subclasses of Ly+ cells in the generation of killer activity. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1390–1399. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantor H., Boyse E. A. Functional subclasses of T-lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. I. The generation of functionally distinct T-cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1376–1389. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle M. V., Parks E., Weigle W. O. Specific, transient suppression of the immune response by HGG tolerant spleen cells. II. Effector cells and target cells. J Immunol. 1976 Oct;117(4):1152–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Folch H., Waksman B. H. The splenic suppressor cell. II. Suppression of mixed lymphocyte reaction by thymus-dependent adherent cells. J Immunol. 1974 Jul;113(1):140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershon R. K., Cohen P., Hencin R., Liebhaber S. A. Suppressor T cells. J Immunol. 1972 Mar;108(3):586–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorczynski R. M. Immunity to murine sarcoma virus-inducted tumors. II. Suppression of T cell-mediated immunity by cells from progressor animals. J Immunol. 1974 May;112(5):1826–1838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ha T. Y., Waksman B. H., Treffers H. P. The thymic suppressor cell. I. Separation of subpopulations with suppressor activity. J Exp Med. 1974 Jan 1;139(1):13–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hardin J. A., Chused T. M., Steinberg A. D. Supressor cells in the graft vs host reaction. J Immunol. 1973 Aug;111(2):650–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katz S. I., Parker D., Turk J. L. B-cell suppression of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Nature. 1974 Oct 11;251(5475):550–551. doi: 10.1038/251550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller T. E., Mackaness G. B., Lagrange P. H. Immunopotentiation with BCG. II. Modulation of the response to sheep red blood cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1669–1676. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morikawa S., Baba M., Harada T., Mitsuoka A. Studies on delayed hypersensitivity in mice. III. Evidence for suppressive regulatory T1-cell population in delayed hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1977 Feb 1;145(2):237–248. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nachtigal D., Zan-Bar I., Feldman M. The role of specific suppressor T cells in immune tolerance. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:87–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neta R., Salvin S. B. Specific suppression of delayed hypersensitivity: the possible presence of a suppressor B cell in the regulation of delayed hypersensitivity. J Immunol. 1974 Dec;113(6):1716–1725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Okumura K., Tada T. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. 3. Effect of thymectomy and splenectomy. J Immunol. 1971 Apr;106(4):1019–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ramshaw I. A., Bretscher P. A., Parish C. R. Regulation of the immune response. I. Suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity by T cells from mice expressing humoral immunity. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Oct;6(10):674–679. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830061003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramshaw I. A., Bretscher P. A., Parish C. R. Regulation of the immune response. II. Repressor T cells in cyclophosphamide-induced tolerant mice. Eur J Immunol. 1977 Mar;7(3):180–185. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830070313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramshaw I. A., McKenzie I. F., Bretscher P. A., Parish C. R. Discrimination of suppressor T cells of humoral and cell-mediated immunity by anti-Ly and anti-Ia sera. Cell Immunol. 1977 Jun 15;31(2):364–369. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simpson E., Cantor H. Regulation of the immune response by subclasses of T lymphocytes. II. The effect of adult thymectomy upon humoral and cellular responses in mice. Eur J Immunol. 1975 May;5(5):337–343. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tada T., Taniguchi M., Takemori T. Properties of primed suppressor T cells and their products. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:106–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. I. The suppression of antibody formation by passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:935–957. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vadas M. A., Miller J. F., McKenzie I. F., Chism S. E., Shen F. W., Boyse E. A., Gamble J. R., Whitelaw A. M. Ly and Ia antigen phenotypes of T cells involved in delayed-type hypersensitivity and in suppression. J Exp Med. 1976 Jul 1;144(1):10–19. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Waksal S. D., St Pierre R. L., Hostetler J. R. Brain-associated-theta antiserum. Differential effects on lymphocyte subpopulations. Cell Immunol. 1974 Apr;12(1):66–73. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zembala M., Asherson G. L. Depression of the T cell phenomenon of contact sensitivity by T cells from unresponsive mice. Nature. 1973 Jul 27;244(5413):227–228. doi: 10.1038/244227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zembala M., Asherson G. L., Mayhew B., Krejci J. In vitro absorption and molecular weight of specific T-cell suppressor factor. Nature. 1975 Jan 3;253(5486):72–74. doi: 10.1038/253072a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zembala M., Asherson G. L., Noworolski J., Mayhew B. Contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: the occurrence of B suppressor cells in the lymph nodes and spleen of immunized mice. Cell Immunol. 1976 Aug;25(2):266–278. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zembala M., Asherson G. L. The effect of cyclophosphamide and irradiation on cells which suppress contact sensitivity in the mouse. Clin Exp Immunol. 1976 Mar;23(3):554–561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES