Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1980 Jun;40(2):183–192.

A T-cell subpopulation committed to help B cells for immune responses restricted to IgM type.

I Naito, Y Bito
PMCID: PMC1458005  PMID: 6967854

Abstract

Immune responses againt bovine serum albumin by chicken were dependent upon thymus-derived cells. Thirty-five of seventy chickens that had been neonatally thymectomized and subsequently immunized with bovine serum albumin produced IgM antibodies, but not IgG antibodies, against the antigen. T cells (IgM-T cells) of such chickens were able to help B cells to produce IgM antibody responses but were not able to help them to switch IgM- to IgG-antibody responses. Helper activity of the IgM-T cells was much less susceptible to the cytotoxic effect of anti-thymus cell serum and complement than was that of normal T cells. The introduction of the IgM-T cells into normal chickens at the same time as the initiation of immunization of the chickens did not affect immune responses by them at all, indicating the absence of suppressor T cells in the IgM-T cell preparations. Injection of chicken thymus factor into immunodeficient chickens transplanted with normal B cells and IgM-T cells developed the capability to help B cells to switch IgM- to IgG-antibody responses. On the basis of these findings the authors propose the existence of helper T cells which are characterized by peripheralization in early periods of ontogeny, the possession of helper activity for only IgM-antibody responses, the lack of helper activity for the switch from IgM- to IgG-antibody responses and relative insusceptibility to the cytotoxic effect of anti-thymus cell serum and complement.

Full text

PDF
183

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dardenne M., Charreire J., Bach J. F. Alterations in thymocyte surface markers after in vivo treatment by serum thymic factor. Cell Immunol. 1978 Aug;39(1):47–54. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(78)90081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ikehara S., Hamashima Y., Masuda T. Immunological restoration of both thymectomised and athymic nude mice by a thymus factor. Nature. 1975 Nov 27;258(5533):335–337. doi: 10.1038/258335a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Okumura K., Metzler C. M., Tsu T. T., Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Two stages of B-cell memory development with different T-cell requirements. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):345–357. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pantelouris E. M. Observations on the immunobiology of 'nude' mice. Immunology. 1971 Feb;20(2):247–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pritchard H., Riddaway J., Micklem H. S. Immune responses in congenitally thymus-less mice. II. Quantitative studies of serum immunoglobulins, the antibody response to sheep erythrocytes, and the effect of thymus allografting. Clin Exp Immunol. 1973 Jan;13(1):125–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roelants G. E., Mayor K. S., Hägg L. B., Loor F. Immature T lineage lymphocytes in athymic mice. Presence of TL, lifespan and homeostatic regulation. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Feb;6(2):75–81. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES