Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1980 Aug;40(4):547–556.

Killing of the S and Re forms of Salmonella minnesota via the classical pathway of complement activation in guinea-pig and human sera.

F Clas, M Loos
PMCID: PMC1458113  PMID: 6776034

Abstract

The S (wildtype) and Re form (heptose-deficient, core-defective mutant) of Salmonella minnesota were killed by treatment with normal guinea-pig serum (GPS). Using C4-deficient GPS and serum containing 0.02 M ethyleneglycol-bis-(beta-aminoethylether)-tetraacetic acid and 0.02 M MgCl2 (EGTA-Mg2+) a reduced killing rate was observed. In normal GPS diluted 1:10 containing 0.02 M EGTA-Mg2+ or in C4-deficient GPS diluted 1:10 no killing occurred, whereas the same serum dilution without EGTA-Mg2+ showed a strong bactericidal effect indicating a dependency upon C4 and Ca2+ ions. Furthermore, in contrast to normal human serum (NHS) no killing occurred in a selective complete C1q-deficient human serum. The bactericidal effect, however, could be restored by addition of highly purified C1q; this is a further indication for a dependency upon the classical pathway of C activation. The C-dependent bactericidal activity was totally abolished when phosphate buffer was used, partially reduced in the presence of veronal-buffered saline (VBS), and not affected by tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane(Tris) or thioglycollate-buffered system EGTA-Mg2+ alone slightly reduced the growth rate of the bacteria whereas disodium ethylene diaminetetraacetate (EDTA) had a bacteriostatic effect on the S-form. The inhibition of the growth of the Re-form by EDTA was amplified by the addition of serum. Pre-incubation of bacteria with serum for absorption of antibodies did not increase the killing rate of such pre-treated bacteria excluding an antibody-mediated bactericidal reaction. Furthermore, pre-treatment of the bacteria with GPS at 0 degrees reduced the serum sensitivity of both types of bacteria.

Full text

PDF
547

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartholomew R. M., Esser A. F. Differences in activation of human and guinea pig complement by retroviruses. J Immunol. 1978 Nov;121(5):1748–1751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkel A. I., Loos M., Sanal O., Mauff G., Güngen Y., Ors U., Ersoy F., Yegin O. Clinical and immunological studies in a case of selective complete C1q deficiency. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979 Oct;38(1):52–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjornson A. B., Bjornson H. S. Activation of complement by opportunist pathogens and chemotypes of Salmonella minnesota. Infect Immun. 1977 Jun;16(3):748–753. doi: 10.1128/iai.16.3.748-753.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bredt W., Wellek B., Brunner H., Loos M. Interactions between mycoplasma pneumoniae and the first components of complement. Infect Immun. 1977 Jan;15(1):7–12. doi: 10.1128/iai.15.1.7-12.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryant R. E., Jenkins D. E., Jr Calcium requirements for complement dependent hemolytic reactions. J Immunol. 1968 Oct;101(4):664–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan T. L., Schellenberg K. A. Studies on the presence and role of tryptophan in pig heart mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1968 Dec 10;243(23):6284–6290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper N. R., Morrison D. C. Binding and activation of the first component of human complement by the lipid A region of lipopolysaccharides. J Immunol. 1978 Jun;120(6):1862–1868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dierich M. P., Bitter-Suermann D., König W., Hadding U., Galanos C., Rietschel E. T. Analysis of bypass activation of C3 by endotoxic LPS and loss of this potency. Immunology. 1973 Apr;24(4):721–733. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gewurz H., Shin H. S., Mergenhagen S. E. Interactions of the complement system with endotoxic lipopolysaccharide: consumption of each of the six terminal complement components. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1049–1057. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loos M., Bitter-Suermann D., Dierich M. Interaction of the first (C1), the second (C2) and the fourth (C4) component of complement with different preparations of bacterial lipopolysaccharides and with lipid A. J Immunol. 1974 Mar;112(3):935–940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loos M., Wellek B., Thesen R., Opferkuch W. Antibody-independent interaction of the first component of complement with Gram-negative bacteria. Infect Immun. 1978 Oct;22(1):5–9. doi: 10.1128/iai.22.1.5-9.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marcus R. L., Shin H. S., Mayer M. M. An alternate complement pathway: C-3 cleaving activity, not due to C4,2a, on endotoxic lipopolysaccharide after treatment with guinea pig serum; relation to properdin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1351–1354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.6.1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morrison D. C., Kline L. F. Activation of the classical and properdin pathways of complement by bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). J Immunol. 1977 Jan;118(1):362–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reynolds B. L., Rowley D. Sensitization of complement resistant bacterial strains. Nature. 1969 Mar 29;221(5187):1259–1261. doi: 10.1038/2211259a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rowley D. Sensitivity of rough gram-negative bacteria to the bactericidal action of serum. J Bacteriol. 1968 May;95(5):1647–1650. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1647-1650.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. STERZL J., PESAK V., KOSTKA J., JILEK M. THE RELATION BETWEEN THE BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY OF COMPLEMENT AND THE CHARACTER OF THE BACTERIAL SURFACES. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 1964 Sep;89:284–298. doi: 10.1007/BF02873307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Volanakis J. E., Stroud R. M. Rabbit C1q: purification, functional and structural studies. J Immunol Methods. 1972 Nov;2(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(72)90014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES