Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 May 15;24(10):1816–1821. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.10.1816

Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the repressor MDBP-2-H1 selectively affects the level of transcription from a methylated promoter in vitro.

A Bruhat 1, J P Jost 1
PMCID: PMC145885  PMID: 8657560

Abstract

We have previously shown that in vivo estradiol-dependent dephosphorylation of MDBP-2-H1 (a member of the histone H1 family) correlates with the loss of in vitro preferential binding to methylated DNA. To study the effects of the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of MDBP-2-H1 on the expression of the avian vitellogenin II gene, we optimised an in vitro transcription system using HeLa nuclear extracts. We show that in the absence of the phosphorylated form of MDBP-2-H1 from rooster, methylation of the vitellogenin II promoter does not affect the transcription. Addition of purified MDBP-2-H1 from rooster to the in vitro transcription system inhibits transcription more efficiently from a methylated than an unmethylated DNA template. Dephosphorylation of rooster MDBP-2-H1 by phosphatase treatment or estradiol treatment of rooster lead to the loss of inhibitory activity of the protein when added to the in vitro transcription assays. These findings indicate that the phosphorylation of MDBP-2-H1 is essential for the repression of the transcription. Taken together these results establish the relationship between the dephosphorylation of MDBP-2-H1 caused by estradiol, the down regulation of its binding activity to methylated DNA and the derepression of vitellogenin II transcription.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (191.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ball D. J., Gross D. S., Garrard W. T. 5-methylcytosine is localized in nucleosomes that contain histone H1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5490–5494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradbury E. M. Reversible histone modifications and the chromosome cell cycle. Bioessays. 1992 Jan;14(1):9–16. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresnick E. H., Bustin M., Marsaud V., Richard-Foy H., Hager G. L. The transcriptionally-active MMTV promoter is depleted of histone H1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jan 25;20(2):273–278. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruhat A., Jost J. P. In vivo estradiol-dependent dephosphorylation of the repressor MDBP-2-H1 correlates with the loss of in vitro preferential binding to methylated DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):3678–3682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buschhausen G., Wittig B., Graessmann M., Graessmann A. Chromatin structure is required to block transcription of the methylated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(5):1177–1181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campoy F. J., Meehan R. R., McKay S., Nixon J., Bird A. Binding of histone H1 to DNA is indifferent to methylation at CpG sequences. J Biol Chem. 1995 Nov 3;270(44):26473–26481. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.44.26473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Comb M., Goodman H. M. CpG methylation inhibits proenkephalin gene expression and binding of the transcription factor AP-2. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 11;18(13):3975–3982. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Croston G. E., Kerrigan L. A., Lira L. M., Marshak D. R., Kadonaga J. T. Sequence-specific antirepression of histone H1-mediated inhibition of basal RNA polymerase II transcription. Science. 1991 Feb 8;251(4994):643–649. doi: 10.1126/science.1899487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falzon M., Kuff E. L. Binding of the transcription factor EBP-80 mediates the methylation response of an intracisternal A-particle long terminal repeat promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):117–125. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo X. W., Th'ng J. P., Swank R. A., Anderson H. J., Tudan C., Bradbury E. M., Roberge M. Chromosome condensation induced by fostriecin does not require p34cdc2 kinase activity and histone H1 hyperphosphorylation, but is associated with enhanced histone H2A and H3 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 1995 Mar 1;14(5):976–985. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07078.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iguchi-Ariga S. M., Schaffner W. CpG methylation of the cAMP-responsive enhancer/promoter sequence TGACGTCA abolishes specific factor binding as well as transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1989 May;3(5):612–619. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.5.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson C. A., Goddard J. P., Adams R. L. The effect of histone H1 and DNA methylation on transcription. Biochem J. 1995 Feb 1;305(Pt 3):791–798. doi: 10.1042/bj3050791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jost J. P., Hofsteenge J. The repressor MDBP-2 is a member of the histone H1 family that binds preferentially in vitro and in vivo to methylated nonspecific DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9499–9503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jost J. P., Munch O., Andersson T. Study of protein-DNA interactions by surface plasmon resonance (real time kinetics). Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 May 25;19(10):2788–2788. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.10.2788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jost J. P., Saluz H. P., Pawlak A. Estradiol down regulates the binding activity of an avian vitellogenin gene repressor (MDBP-2) and triggers a gradual demethylation of the mCpG pair of its DNA binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 25;19(20):5771–5775. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jost J. P., Seldran M. Association of transcriptionally active vitellogenin II gene with the nuclear matrix of chicken liver. EMBO J. 1984 Sep;3(9):2005–2008. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02082.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kandolf H. The H1A histone variant is an in vivo repressor of oocyte-type 5S gene transcription in Xenopus laevis embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):7257–7261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Keshet I., Yisraeli J., Cedar H. Effect of regional DNA methylation on gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(9):2560–2564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.9.2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laybourn P. J., Kadonaga J. T. Role of nucleosomal cores and histone H1 in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science. 1991 Oct 11;254(5029):238–245. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Levine A., Yeivin A., Ben-Asher E., Aloni Y., Razin A. Histone H1-mediated inhibition of transcription initiation of methylated templates in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 15;268(29):21754–21759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ley T. J., Anagnou N. P., Pepe G., Nienhuis A. W. RNA processing errors in patients with beta-thalassemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4775–4779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meehan R. R., Lewis J. D., McKay S., Kleiner E. L., Bird A. P. Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):499–507. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90430-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nightingale K., Wolffe A. P. Methylation at CpG sequences does not influence histone H1 binding to a nucleosome including a Xenopus borealis 5 S rRNA gene. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 3;270(9):4197–4200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pawlak A., Bryans M., Jost J. P. An avian 40 KDa nucleoprotein binds preferentially to a promoter sequence containing one single pair of methylated CpG. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Mar 11;19(5):1029–1034. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.5.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Robertson K. D., Hayward S. D., Ling P. D., Samid D., Ambinder R. F. Transcriptional activation of the Epstein-Barr virus latency C promoter after 5-azacytidine treatment: evidence that demethylation at a single CpG site is crucial. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6150–6159. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Chromatin condensation: does histone H1 dephosphorylation play a role? Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Mar;17(3):93–98. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90243-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saluz H. P., Feavers I. M., Jiricny J., Jost J. P. Genomic sequencing and in vivo footprinting of an expression-specific DNase I-hypersensitive site of avian vitellogenin II promoter reveal a demethylation of a mCpG and a change in specific interactions of proteins with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(18):6697–6700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tazi J., Bird A. Alternative chromatin structure at CpG islands. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):909–920. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90339-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Th'ng J. P., Guo X. W., Swank R. A., Crissman H. A., Bradbury E. M. Inhibition of histone phosphorylation by staurosporine leads to chromosome decondensation. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 1;269(13):9568–9573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ura K., Hayes J. J., Wolffe A. P. A positive role for nucleosome mobility in the transcriptional activity of chromatin templates: restriction by linker histones. EMBO J. 1995 Aug 1;14(15):3752–3765. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00045.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Watt F., Molloy P. L. Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev. 1988 Sep;2(9):1136–1143. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weintraub H. Histone-H1-dependent chromatin superstructures and the suppression of gene activity. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90522-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zlatanova J., Yaneva J. Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function. DNA Cell Biol. 1991 May;10(4):239–248. doi: 10.1089/dna.1991.10.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES