Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Jan;148(1):201–210. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.201

Quantitative genetics of ovariole number in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutational variation and genotype-environment interaction.

M L Wayne 1, T F Mackay 1
PMCID: PMC1459805  PMID: 9475732

Abstract

The rare alleles model of mutation-selection balance (MSB) hypothesis for the maintenance of genetic variation was evaluated for two quantitative traits, ovariole number and body size. Mutational variances (VM) for these traits, estimated from mutation accumulation lines, were 4.75 and 1.97 x 10(-4) times the environmental variance (VE), respectively. The mutation accumulation lines were studied in three environments to test for genotype x environment interaction (GEI) of new mutations; significant mutational GEI was found for both traits. Mutations for ovariole number have a quadratic relationship with competitive fitness, suggesting stabilizing selection for the trait; there is no significant correlation between mutations for body size and competitive fitness. Under MSB, the ratio of segregating genetic variance, VG, to mutational variance, VM, estimates the inverse of the selection coefficient against a heterozygote for a new mutation. Estimates of VG/VM for ovariole number and body size were both approximately 1.1 x 10(4). Thus, MSB can explain the level of variation, if mutations affecting these traits are under very weak selection, which is inconsistent with the empirical observation of stabilizing selection, or if the estimate of VM is biased downward by two orders of magnitude. GEI is a possible alternative explanation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):773–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton N. H., Turelli M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:337–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caballero A., Keightley P. D. A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):883–900. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coyne J. A., Rux J., David J. R. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet Res. 1991 Apr;57(2):113–122. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crow J. F. Minor viability mutants in Drosophila. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1 Pt 1 Suppl):s165–s172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillespie J. H. Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic characters. Genetics. 1984 Jun;107(2):321–330. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.2.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillespie J. H., Turelli M. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):129–138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houle D., Morikawa B., Lynch M. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1467–1483. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kearsey M. U., Barnes B. W. Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. II. Natural selection. Heredity (Edinb) 1970 Feb;25(1):11–21. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1970.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keightley P. D., Mackay T. F., Caballero A. Accounting for bias in estimates of the rate of polygenic mutation. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):291–296. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keightley P. D. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1315–1322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kondrashov A. S., Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyman R. F., Lawrence F., Nuzhdin S. V., Mackay T. F. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):277–292. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mackay T. F., Hackett J. B., Lyman R. F., Wayne M. L., Anholt R. R. Quantitative genetic variation of odor-guided behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):727–735. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Hill W. G. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: non-linear divergence among unselected strains. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):849–859. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nuzhdin S. V., Fry J. D., Mackay T. F. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: the causal relationship of bristle number to fitness. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):861–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roff D. A., Mousseau T. A. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Feb;58(Pt 1):103–118. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas-Orillard M. Application de la méthode des croisements diallèles a l'étude du déterminisme du nombre d'ovarioles chez Drosophila melanogaster. Meig. Ann Genet. 1967 Dec;10(4):207–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Turelli M. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Apr;25(2):138–193. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES