Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Feb;148(2):753–766. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.753

EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

P D Keightley 1, O Ohnishi 1
PMCID: PMC1459817  PMID: 9504922

Abstract

Polygenic mutations were induced by treating Drosophila melanogaster adult males with 2.5 mM EMS. The treated second chromosomes, along with untreated controls, were then made homozygous, and five life history, two behavioral, and two morphological traits were measured. EMS mutagenesis led to reduced performance for life history traits. Changes in means and increments in genetic variance were relatively much higher for life history than for morphological traits, implying large differences in mutational target size. Maximum likelihood was used to estimate mutation rates and parameters of distributions of mutation effects, but parameters were strongly confounded with one another. Several traits showed evidence of leptokurtic distributions of effects and mean effects smaller than a few percent of trait means. Distributions of effects for all traits were strongly asymmetrical, and most mutations were deleterious. Correlations between life history mutation effects were positive. Mutation parameters for one generation of spontaneous mutation were predicted by scaling parameter estimates from the EMS experiment, extrapolated to the whole genome. Predicted mutational coefficients of variation were in good agreement with published estimates. Predicted changes in means were up to 0.14% or 0.6% for life history traits, depending on the model of scaling assumed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akashi H. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1297–1307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderson T. Chemically induced delayed germinal mutation in Drosophila. Nature. 1965 Jul 10;207(993):164–167. doi: 10.1038/207164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayaki T., Ohshima K., Okumura Y., Yoshikawa I., Shiomi T. The relationship between lethal mutation yield and intake of ethylnitrosourea (ENU) in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mutagen. 1984;6(4):483–488. doi: 10.1002/em.2860060402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton N. H., Turelli M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:337–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crow J. F. The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8380–8386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernández J., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):829–837. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Houle D., Hughes K. A., Hoffmaster D. K., Ihara J., Assimacopoulos S., Canada D., Charlesworth B. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):773–785. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houle D., Morikawa B., Lynch M. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1467–1483. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keightley P. D., Caballero A. Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):3823–3827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keightley P. D., Mackay T. F., Caballero A. Accounting for bias in estimates of the rate of polygenic mutation. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):291–296. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keightley P. D. Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1993–1999. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keightley P. D. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1315–1322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kreitman M., Hudson R. R. Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):565–582. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lai C., Lyman R. F., Long A. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphisms at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1697–1702. doi: 10.1126/science.7992053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Langley C. H., Montgomery E., Hudson R., Kaplan N., Charlesworth B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 1988 Dec;52(3):223–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Long A. D., Mullaney S. L., Reid L. A., Fry J. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1273–1291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lyman R. F., Lawrence F., Nuzhdin S. V., Mackay T. F. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):277–292. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. López M. A., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Response to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):107–116. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MUKAI T. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mackay T. F., Fry J. D., Lyman R. F., Nuzhdin S. V. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):937–951. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mackay T. F. The genetic basis of quantitative variation: numbers of sensory bristles of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):464–470. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Merchante M., Caballero A., López-Fanjul C. Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. II. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1995 Dec;66(3):227–240. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mukai T. Viability mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1970 Jun;65(2):335–348. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Muñoz E. R. Contribution of ethyl methanesulfonate vapors to the yield of mutations detected in Drosophila melanogaster when the adult feeding technique is used. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1987;10(3):307–309. doi: 10.1002/em.2850100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nuzhdin S. V., Fry J. D., Mackay T. F. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: the causal relationship of bristle number to fitness. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):861–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Recessive lethal mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):519–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Heterozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):547–556. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pastink A., Heemskerk E., Nivard M. J., van Vliet C. J., Vogel E. W. Mutational specificity of ethyl methanesulfonate in excision-repair-proficient and -deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Oct;229(2):213–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00272158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Peck J. R., Barreau G., Heath S. C. Imperfect genes, Fisherian mutation and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1171–1199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Peck J. R., Eyre-Walker A. Evolutionary genetics. The muddle about mutations. Nature. 1997 May 8;387(6629):135–136. doi: 10.1038/387135a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Santiago E., Albornoz J., Domínguez A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The distribution of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):771–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson E. D., Reeder B. A., Bruce R. D. Characterization of a method for quantitating food consumption for mutation assays in Drosophila. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1991;18(1):14–21. doi: 10.1002/em.2850180104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vogel E., Natarajan A. T. The relation between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action of mono-functional alkylating agents in higher eukaryotic systems. I. Recessive lethal mutations and translocations in Drosophila. Mutat Res. 1979 Aug;62(1):51–100. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(79)90223-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES