Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Jul 15;24(14):2767–2773. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.14.2767

Analysis of co-crystal structures to identify the stereochemical determinants of the orientation of TBP on the TATA box.

M Suzuki 1, M D Allen 1, N Yagi 1, J T Finch 1
PMCID: PMC146021  PMID: 8759009

Abstract

Possible stereochemical determinants of the orientation of TBP on the TATA box are discussed using the crystal coordinates of TBP-TATA complexes, which have been determined by other groups. The C-terminal half of the TBP beta-sheet interacts with the TATA site of the DNA, and the N-terminal half with the A-rich site, so that the two sites with distinct curvatures produce a unique fit. Although chemical contacts take place between one side of the beta-sheet and the DNA minor groove, the interaction seems to be facilitated indirectly by the characteristics of the other side of the beta-sheet and the DNA major groove. Thus, Ala71, Leu162 and Pro190 differentiate the curvature of the beta-sheet in the N- and C-halves. The methyl positions in the DNA major groove modulate the bendability of the two DNA sites by using differences in the rolling capacity of TA and AT compared with PyT, and in the shifting capacity of AT compared with TT. The deformations of the first steps (TA and PyT) in the two sites are the largest and thus are important for the overall bending of the DNA. The differences between the two DNA sites are greatest at the second steps (AT and TT) and so these are important for determining the orientation of TBP.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (186.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Babcock M. S., Pednault E. P., Olson W. K. Nucleic acid structure analysis. Mathematics for local Cartesian and helical structure parameters that are truly comparable between structures. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 18;237(1):125–156. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babcock M. S., Pednault E. P., Olson W. K. Nucleic acid structure analysis: a users guide to a collection of new analysis programs. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1993 Dec;11(3):597–628. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1993.10508018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buratowski S., Hahn S., Guarente L., Sharp P. A. Five intermediate complexes in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):549–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90578-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chasman D. I., Flaherty K. M., Sharp P. A., Kornberg R. D. Crystal structure of yeast TATA-binding protein and model for interaction with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8174–8178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chothia C. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:537–572. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.002541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):1–4. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03339.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodsell D. S., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M., Dickerson R. E. The crystal structure of C-C-A-T-T-A-A-T-G-G. Implications for bending of B-DNA at T-A steps. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 27;239(1):79–96. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hahn S., Buratowski S., Sharp P. A., Guarente L. Yeast TATA-binding protein TFIID binds to TATA elements with both consensus and nonconsensus DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(15):5718–5722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoey T., Dynlacht B. D., Peterson M. G., Pugh B. F., Tjian R. Isolation and characterization of the Drosophila gene encoding the TATA box binding protein, TFIID. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90682-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunter C. A. Sequence-dependent DNA structure. The role of base stacking interactions. J Mol Biol. 1993 Apr 5;230(3):1025–1054. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Janin J., Chothia C. Packing of alpha-helices onto beta-pleated sheets and the anatomy of alpha/beta proteins. J Mol Biol. 1980 Oct 15;143(1):95–128. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90126-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim J. L., Burley S. K. 1.9 A resolution refined structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of TATAAAAG. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Sep;1(9):638–653. doi: 10.1038/nsb0994-638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim J. L., Nikolov D. B., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):520–527. doi: 10.1038/365520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim Y., Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):512–520. doi: 10.1038/365512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klug A., Jack A., Viswamitra M. A., Kennard O., Shakked Z., Steitz T. A. A hypothesis on a specific sequence-dependent conformation of DNA and its relation to the binding of the lac-repressor protein. J Mol Biol. 1979 Jul 15;131(4):669–680. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90196-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klug A. Transcription. Opening the gateway. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):486–487. doi: 10.1038/365486a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levitt M. How many base-pairs per turn does DNA have in solution and in chromatin? Some theoretical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb;75(2):640–644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nelson H. C., Finch J. T., Luisi B. F., Klug A. The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987 Nov 19;330(6145):221–226. doi: 10.1038/330221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nikolov D. B., Hu S. H., Lin J., Gasch A., Hoffmann A., Horikoshi M., Chua N. H., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Crystal structure of TFIID TATA-box binding protein. Nature. 1992 Nov 5;360(6399):40–46. doi: 10.1038/360040a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prestridge D. S. Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 23;249(5):923–932. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reddy P., Hahn S. Dominant negative mutations in yeast TFIID define a bipartite DNA-binding region. Cell. 1991 Apr 19;65(2):349–357. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rigby P. W. Three in one and one in three: it all depends on TBP. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90042-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharp P. A. TATA-binding protein is a classless factor. Cell. 1992 Mar 6;68(5):819–821. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suzuki M. A framework for the DNA-protein recognition code of the probe helix in transcription factors: the chemical and stereochemical rules. Structure. 1994 Apr 15;2(4):317–326. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suzuki M., Yagi N., Finch J. T. Role of base-backbone and base-base interactions in alternating DNA conformations. FEBS Lett. 1996 Jan 29;379(2):148–152. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01506-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Suzuki M., Yagi N., Gerstein M. DNA recognition and superstructure formation by helix-turn-helix proteins. Protein Eng. 1995 Apr;8(4):329–338. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.4.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Suzuki M., Yagi N. Stereochemical basis of DNA bending by transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jun 25;23(12):2083–2091. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.12.2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Dyke M. W., Roeder R. G., Sawadogo M. Physical analysis of transcription preinitiation complex assembly on a class II gene promoter. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1335–1338. doi: 10.1126/science.3413495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. White R. J., Jackson S. P. The TATA-binding protein: a central role in transcription by RNA polymerases I, II and III. Trends Genet. 1992 Aug;8(8):284–288. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wong J. M., Bateman E. TBP-DNA interactions in the minor groove discriminate between A:T and T:A base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 May 25;22(10):1890–1896. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.10.1890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yamamoto T., Horikoshi M., Wang J., Hasegawa S., Weil P. A., Roeder R. G. A bipartite DNA binding domain composed of direct repeats in the TATA box binding factor TFIID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1;89(7):2844–2848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES