Abstract
With the aim of revealing genetic variation accumulated among closely related species during the course of evolution, this study focuses on loss of macrochaetae on the notum as one of the developmental anomalies seen in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its closely related species. Interspecific hybrids between a line of D. melanogaster and D. simulans isofemale lines exhibited a wide range in the number of missing bristles. By contrast, D. mauritiana and D. sechellia lines showed almost no reduction in bristle number in hybrids with D. melanogaster. Genetic analysis showed that the D. simulans X chromosome confers a large effect on hybrid bristle loss, although X-autosome interaction may be involved. This suggests that at least one genetic factor contributing to hybrid anomalies arose recently on a D. simulans X chromosome. Moreover, the results indicate sex dependency: the male hybrids were more susceptible to bristle loss than the female hybrids were. Use of cell type markers suggests that the defect does not lie in cell fate decisions during bristle development, but in the maintenance of neural fate and/or differentiation of the descendants of sensory mother cells.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (806.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bellen H. J., O'Kane C. J., Wilson C., Grossniklaus U., Pearson R. K., Gehring W. J. P-element-mediated enhancer detection: a versatile method to study development in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1989 Sep;3(9):1288–1300. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.9.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biddle R L. The Bristles of Hybrids between DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER and DROSOPHILA SIMULANS. Genetics. 1932 Mar;17(2):153–174. doi: 10.1093/genetics/17.2.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):441–450. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulianne G. L., de la Concha A., Campos-Ortega J. A., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. The Drosophila neurogenic gene neuralized encodes a novel protein and is expressed in precursors of larval and adult neurons. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):2975–2983. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07848.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brand M., Jarman A. P., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. asense is a Drosophila neural precursor gene and is capable of initiating sense organ formation. Development. 1993 Sep;119(1):1–17. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.Supplement.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabot E. L., Davis A. W., Johnson N. A., Wu C. I. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):175–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coyne J. A. Genetic basis of male sterility in hybrids between two closely related species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4444–4447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A. W., Roote J., Morley T., Sawamura K., Herrmann S., Ashburner M. Rescue of hybrid sterility in crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):157–159. doi: 10.1038/380157a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis H. M., Spann D. R., Posakony J. W. extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90212-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Bellido A. Genetic Analysis of the Achaete-Scute System of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Mar;91(3):491–520. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrell J., Modolell J. The Drosophila extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90213-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghysen A., Dambly-Chaudiere C. Genesis of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Trends Genet. 1989 Aug;5(8):251–255. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollocher H., Wu C. I. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1243–1255. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutter P., Roote J., Ashburner M. A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):909–920. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson S. M., Blochlinger K. cut interacts with Notch and protein kinase A to regulate egg chamber formation and to maintain germline cyst integrity during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1997 Sep;124(18):3663–3672. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.18.3663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarman A. P., Brand M., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. The regulation and function of the helix-loop-helix gene, asense, in Drosophila neural precursors. Development. 1993 Sep;119(1):19–29. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.Supplement.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez F., Campos-Ortega J. A. Defective neuroblast commitment in mutants of the achaete-scute complex and adjacent genes of D. melanogaster. Neuron. 1990 Jul;5(1):81–89. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90036-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Mercer J. M., Stam L. F., Gibson G. C., Zeng Z. B., Laurie C. C. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1129–1145. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohe A. R., Roberts P. A. An unusual Y chromosome of Drosophila simulans carrying amplified rDNA spacer without rRNA genes. Genetics. 1990 Jun;125(2):399–406. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.2.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long A. D., Mullaney S. L., Reid L. A., Fry J. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1273–1291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M., Maruyama T., Wu C. I. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):557–579. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orr H. A. Genetics of male and female sterility in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):555–563. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.4.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orr H. A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1805–1813. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parks A. L., Muskavitch M. A. Delta function is required for bristle organ determination and morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1993 Jun;157(2):484–496. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson C. M., Finer N. N., Sauve R. S., Whitfield M. F., Belgaumkar T. K., Synnes A. R., Grace M. G. Neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CMAJ. 1995 Jun 15;152(12):1981–1988. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruohola H., Bremer K. A., Baker D., Swedlow J. R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Role of neurogenic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):433–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawamura K., Yamamoto M. T., Watanabe T. K. Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):307–313. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sturtevant A H. Genetic Studies on DROSOPHILA SIMULANS. I. Introduction. Hybrids with DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1920 Sep;5(5):488–500. doi: 10.1093/genetics/5.5.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- True J. R., Weir B. S., Laurie C. C. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):819–837. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turelli M., Orr H. A. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):389–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zipursky S. L., Venkatesh T. R., Teplow D. B., Benzer S. Neuronal development in the Drosophila retina: monoclonal antibodies as molecular probes. Cell. 1984 Jan;36(1):15–26. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]