Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Aug;149(4):2119–2133. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2119

Canalization, genetic assimilation and preadaptation. A quantitative genetic model.

I Eshel 1, C Matessi 1
PMCID: PMC1460279  PMID: 9691063

Abstract

We propose a mathematical model to analyze the evolution of canalization for a trait under stabilizing selection, where each individual in the population is randomly exposed to different environmental conditions, independently of its genotype. Without canalization, our trait (primary phenotype) is affected by both genetic variation and environmental perturbations (morphogenic environment). Selection of the trait depends on individually varying environmental conditions (selecting environment). Assuming no plasticity initially, morphogenic effects are not correlated with the direction of selection in individual environments. Under quite plausible assumptions we show that natural selection favors a system of canalization that tends to repress deviations from the phenotype that is optimal in the most common selecting environment. However, many experimental results, dating back to Waddington and others, indicate that natural canalization systems may fail under extreme environments. While this can be explained as an impossibility of the system to cope with extreme morphogenic pressure, we show that a canalization system that tends to be inactivated in extreme environments is even more advantageous than rigid canalization. Moreover, once this adaptive canalization is established, the resulting evolution of primary phenotype enables substantial preadaptation to permanent environmental changes resembling extreme niches of the previous environment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (180.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DUN R. B., FRASER A. S. Selection for an invariant character; vibrissa number in the house mouse. Nature. 1958 Apr 5;181(4614):1018–1019. doi: 10.1038/1811018a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamilton W. D. Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):477–488. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3774.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kindred B. Selection for an invariant character, vibrissa number in the house mouse. V. Selection on non-tabby segregants from tabby selection lines. Genetics. 1967 Feb;55(2):365–373. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Levins R. Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. V. Optimal Genetic Systems. Genetics. 1965 Nov;52(5):891–904. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.5.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MILKMAN R. Temperature effects on day old Drosophila pupae. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Mar;45:777–799. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.4.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Matessi C., Di Pasquale C. Long-term evolution of multilocus traits. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):613–653. doi: 10.1007/BF02409752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Milkman R D. The Genetic Basis of Natural Variation. I. Crossveins in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1960 Jan;45(1):35–48. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Milkman R D. The Genetic Basis of Natural Variation. III. Developmental Lability and Evolutionary Potential. Genetics. 1961 Jan;46(1):25–38. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Møller A. P. Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature. 1992 May 21;357(6375):238–240. doi: 10.1038/357238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Parsons P. A. Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Apr;68(Pt 4):361–364. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rendel J. M., Sheldon B. L., Finlay D. E. Canalisation of development of scutellar bristles in Drosophila by control of the scute locus. Genetics. 1965 Dec;52(6):1137–1151. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.6.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith J M, Sondhi K C. The Genetics of a Pattern. Genetics. 1960 Aug;45(8):1039–1050. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.8.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. WADDINGTON C. H. Genetic assimilation. Adv Genet. 1961;10:257–293. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WADDINGTON C. H. Selection of the genetic basis for an acquired character. Nature. 1952 Feb 16;169(4294):278–278. doi: 10.1038/169278a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES