Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Oct;150(2):777–790. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.777

Genetic variation and differentiation at microsatellite loci in Drosophila simulans. Evidence for founder effects in new world populations.

S D Irvin 1, K A Wetterstrand 1, C M Hutter 1, C F Aquadro 1
PMCID: PMC1460346  PMID: 9755208

Abstract

Drosophila simulans isofemale lines from Africa, South America, and two locations in North America were surveyed for variation at 16 microsatellite loci on the X, second, and third chromosomes, and 18 microsatellites, which are unmapped. D. simulans is thought to have colonized New World habitats only relatively recently (within the last few hundred years). Consistent with a founder effect occurring as colonizers moved into these New World habitats, we find less microsatellite variability in North and South American D. simulans populations than for an African population. Population subdivision as measured at microsatellites is moderate when averaged across all loci (FST = 0.136), but contrasts sharply with previous studies of allozyme variation, which have showed significantly less differentiation in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster. There are substantially fewer private alleles observed in New World populations of D. simulans than seen in a similar survey of D. melanogaster. In addition to possible differences in population size during their evolutionary histories, varying colonization histories or other demographic events may be necessary to explain discrepancies in the patterns of variation observed at various genetic markers between these closely related species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (249.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aquadro C. F., Lado K. M., Noon W. A. The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquadro C. F. Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1992 Oct;8(10):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baba-Aïssa F., Solignac M., Dennebouy N., David J. R. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Drosophila simulans: quasi absence of polymorphism within each of the three cytoplasmic races. Heredity (Edinb) 1988 Dec;61(Pt 3):419–426. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ballard J. W., Hatzidakis J., Karr T. L., Kreitman M. Reduced variation in Drosophila simulans mitochondrial DNA. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1519–1528. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1019–1032. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornuet J. M., Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):2001–2014. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellegren H., Moore S., Robinson N., Byrne K., Ward W., Sheldon B. C. Microsatellite evolution--a reciprocal study of repeat lengths at homologous loci in cattle and sheep. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Aug;14(8):854–860. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giraud T., Capy P. Somatic activity of the mariner transposable element in natural populations of Drosophila simulans. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Nov 22;263(1376):1481–1486. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gloor G. B., Preston C. R., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Nassif N. A., Phillis R. W., Benz W. K., Robertson H. M., Engels W. R. Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):81–95. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M., Harshman L. G. Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):933–948. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyytia P., Capy P., David J. R., Singh R. S. Enzymatic and quantitative variation in European and African populations of Drosophila simulans. Heredity (Edinb) 1985 Apr;54(Pt 2):209–217. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1985.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maruyama T., Fuerst P. A. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):675–689. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583–590. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rand D. M., Dorfsman M., Kann L. M. Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):741–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schlötterer C., Vogl C., Tautz D. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):309–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schug M. D., Wetterstrand K. A., Gaudette M. S., Lim R. H., Hutter C. M., Aquadro C. F. The distribution and frequency of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Ecol. 1998 Jan;7(1):57–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh R. S. Population genetics and evolution of species related to Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:425–453. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Slatkin M. Hitchhiking and associative overdominance at a microsatellite locus. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):473–480. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tautz D. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Aug 25;17(16):6463–6471. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.16.6463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vieira C., Biémont C. Geographical variation in insertion site number of retrotransposon 412 in Drosophila simulans. J Mol Evol. 1996 Apr;42(4):443–451. doi: 10.1007/BF02498638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES