Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Nov;150(3):1143–1154. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1143

Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from Northern Italy.

H C Hauffe 1, J B Searle 1
PMCID: PMC1460399  PMID: 9799266

Abstract

Following the discovery of over 40 Robertsonian (Rb) races of Mus musculus domesticus in Europe and North Africa, the house mouse has been studied extensively as an ideal model to determine the chromosomal changes that may cause or accompany speciation. Current models of chromosomal speciation are based on the assumption that heterozygous individuals have a particularly low fertility, although recent studies indicate otherwise. Despite their importance, fertility estimates for the house mouse are incomplete because traditional measurements, such as anaphase I nondisjunction and germ cell death, are rarely estimated in conjunction with litter size. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we have taken advantage of the house mouse hybrid zone in Upper Valtellina (Lombardy, Italy) in which five Rb races interbreed. We present data on the fertility of naturally occurring ("wild-caught") hybrids and of offspring from laboratory crosses of wild-caught mice ("laboratory-reared"), using various measurements. Wild-caught mice heterozygous for one fusion were more infertile than predicted from past studies, possibly due to genic hybridity; laboratory-reared heterozygotes carrying seven or eight trivalents at meiosis I and heterozygotes carrying one pentavalent also had low fertilities. These low fertilities are especially significant given the probable occurrence of a reinforcement event in Upper Valtellina.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. J., Bickham J. W. Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8245–8248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bengtsson B. O. Rates of karyotype evolution in placental mammals. Hereditas. 1980;92(1):37–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1980.tb01676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britton-Davidian J., Sonjaya H., Catalan J., Cattaneo-Berrebi G. Robertsonian heterozygosity in wild mice: fertility and transmission rates in Rb(16.17) translocation heterozygotes. Genetica. 1990;80(3):171–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00137322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgoyne P. S., Baker T. G. Meiotic pairing and gametogenic failure. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38:349–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Capanna E., Redi C. A. Whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) between Robertsonian chromosomes: finding of a Robertsonian heterozygous mouse with karyotype derived through WARTs. Chromosome Res. 1995 Mar;3(2):135–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00710676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Everett C. A., Searle J. B., Wallace B. M. A study of meiotic pairing, nondisjunction and germ cell death in laboratory mice carrying Robertsonian translocations. Genet Res. 1996 Jun;67(3):239–247. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300033723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraguedakis-Tsolis S., Hauffe H. C., Searle J. B. Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):355–360. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garagna S., Redi C. A., Zuccotti M., Britton-Davidian J., Winking H. Kinetics of oogenesis in mice heterozygous for Robertsonian translocation. Differentiation. 1990 Feb;42(3):167–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1990.tb00758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grocock C. A., Clarke J. R. Photoperiodic control of testis activity in the vole, Microtus agrestis. J Reprod Fertil. 1974 Aug;39(2):337–347. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0390337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gropp A., Tettenborn U., von Lehmann E. Chromosomenvariation vom Robertson'schen Typus bei der Tabakmaus, M. poschiavinus, und ihren Hybriden mit der Laboratoriumsmaus. Cytogenetics. 1970;9(1):9–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gropp A., Winking H., Redi C., Capanna E., Britton-Davidian J., Noack G. Robertsonian karyotype variation in wild house mice from Rhaeto-Lombardia. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1982;34(1-2):67–77. doi: 10.1159/000131794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris M. J., Wallace M. E., Evans E. P. Aneuploidy in the embryonic progeny of females heterozygous for the Robertsonian chromosome (9.12) in genetically wild Peru-Coppock mice (Mus musculus). J Reprod Fertil. 1986 Jan;76(1):193–203. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0760193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quinn P., Barros C., Whittingham D. G. Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1982 Sep;66(1):161–168. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0660161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Redi C. A., Garagna S., Hilscher B., Winking H. The effects of some Robertsonian chromosome combinations on the seminiferous epithelium of the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Feb;85:1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Said K., Saad A., Auffray J. C., Britton-Davidian J. Fertility estimates in the Tunisian all-acrocentric and Robertsonian populations of the house mouse and their chromosomal hybrids. Heredity (Edinb) 1993 Nov;71(Pt 5):532–538. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Searle A. G., Beechey C. V. Sperm-count, egg-fertilization and dominant lethality after X-irradiation of mice. Mutat Res. 1974 Jan;22(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(74)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sumner A. T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Nov;75(1):304–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90558-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tettenborn U., Gropp A. Meiotic nondisjunction in mice and mouse hybrids. Cytogenetics. 1970;9(4):272–283. doi: 10.1159/000130097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Viroux M. C., Bauchau V. Segregation and fertility in Mus musculus domesticus (wild mice) heterozygous for the Rb(4.12) translocation. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Feb;68(Pt 2):131–134. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wallace B. M., Searle J. B., Everett C. A. Male meiosis and gametogenesis in wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from a chromosomal hybrid zone; a comparison between "simple" Robertsonian heterozygotes and homozygotes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1992;61(3):211–220. doi: 10.1159/000133410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Winking H. Some aspects of Robertsonian karyotype variation in European wild mice. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1986;127:68–74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-71304-0_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES