Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Dec;150(4):1585–1593. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1585

DNA polymorphism in lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length.

W Stephan 1, C H Langley 1
PMCID: PMC1460412  PMID: 9832534

Abstract

Surveys in Drosophila have consistently found reduced levels of DNA sequence polymorphism in genomic regions experiencing low crossing-over per physical length, while these same regions exhibit normal amounts of interspecific divergence. Here we show that for 36 loci across the genomes of eight Lycopersicon species, naturally occurring DNA polymorphism (scaled by locus-specific divergence between species) is positively correlated with the density of crossing-over per physical length. Large between-species differences in the amount of DNA sequence polymorphism reflect breeding systems: selfing species show much less within-species polymorphism than outcrossing species. The strongest association of expected heterozygosity with crossing-over is found in species with intermediate levels of average nucleotide diversity. All of these observations appear to be in qualitative agreement with the hitchhiking effects caused by the fixation of advantageous mutations and/or "background selection" against deleterious mutations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (199.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpenter A. T. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1979;75(3):259–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00293472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter A. T. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):511–541. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131–149. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dvorák J., Luo M. C., Yang Z. L. Restriction fragment length polymorphism and divergence in the genomic regions of high and low recombination in self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing aegilops species. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):423–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hedrick P. W. Hitchhiking: a comparison of linkage and partial selfing. Genetics. 1980 Mar;94(3):791–808. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu F., Zhang L., Charlesworth D. Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 22;265(1393):293–301. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Long A. D., Lyman R. F., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. Two sites in the Delta gene region contribute to naturally occurring variation in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):999–1017. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nachman M. W. Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1303–1316. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nordborg M. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics. 1997 Aug;146(4):1501–1514. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perl-Treves R., Abu-Abied M., Magal N., Galun E., Zamir D. Genetic mapping of tomato cDNA clones encoding the chloroplastic and the cytosolic isozymes of superoxide dismutase. Biochem Genet. 1990 Oct;28(9-10):543–552. doi: 10.1007/BF00554381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sherman J. D., Stack S. M. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):683–708. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stephan W., Langley C. H. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. I. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):89–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanksley S. D., Ganal M. W., Prince J. P., de Vicente M. C., Bonierbale M. W., Broun P., Fulton T. M., Giovannoni J. J., Grandillo S., Martin G. B. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1141–1160. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tanksley S. D., Loaiza-Figueroa F. Gametophytic self-incompatibility is controlled by a single major locus on chromosome 1 in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Aug;82(15):5093–5096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.15.5093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES