Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Dec;150(4):1419–1428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1419

The SFP1 gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae regulates G2/M transitions during the mitotic cell cycle and DNA-damage response.

Z Xu 1, D Norris 1
PMCID: PMC1460418  PMID: 9832520

Abstract

In eukaryotic cells, checkpoint pathways arrest cell-cycle progression if a particular event has failed to complete appropriately or if an important intracellular structure is defective or damaged. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that lack the SFP1 gene fail to arrest at the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint in response to genomic injury, but maintain their ability to arrest at the replication and spindle-assembly checkpoints. sfp1Delta mutants are characterized by a premature entrance into mitosis during a normal (undamaged) cell cycle, while strains that overexpress Sfp1p exhibit delays in G2. Sfp1p therefore acts as a repressor of the G2/M transition, both in the normal cell cycle and in the G2 checkpoint pathway. Sfp1 is a nuclear protein with two Cys2His2 zinc-finger domains commonly found in transcription factors. We propose that Sfp1p regulates the expression of gene products involved in the G2/M transition during the mitotic cell cycle and the DNA-damage response. In support of this model, overexpression of Sfp1p induces the expression of the PDS1 gene, which is known to encode a protein that regulates the G2 checkpoint.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (234.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Vialard J. E., Morrison D. E., de la Torre-Ruiz M. A., Cernáková L., Fabre F., Lowndes N. F. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):3912–3922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E. C., Elledge S. J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2401–2415. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumberg H., Silver P. A split zinc-finger protein is required for normal yeast growth. Gene. 1991 Oct 30;107(1):101–110. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90302-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciosk R., Zachariae W., Michaelis C., Shevchenko A., Mann M., Nasmyth K. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell. 1998 Jun 12;93(6):1067–1076. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen-Fix O., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W., Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 1996 Dec 15;10(24):3081–3093. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.24.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elledge S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1664–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Estruch F., Carlson M. Two homologous zinc finger genes identified by multicopy suppression in a SNF1 protein kinase mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):3872–3881. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fasano L., Röder L., Coré N., Alexandre E., Vola C., Jacq B., Kerridge S. The gene teashirt is required for the development of Drosophila embryonic trunk segments and encodes a protein with widely spaced zinc finger motifs. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):63–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90209-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Furnari B., Rhind N., Russell P. Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Science. 1997 Sep 5;277(5331):1495–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garvik B., Carson M., Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6128–6138. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gould K. L., Nurse P. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the fission yeast cdc2+ protein kinase regulates entry into mitosis. Nature. 1989 Nov 2;342(6245):39–45. doi: 10.1038/342039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffiths D. J., Barbet N. C., McCready S., Lehmann A. R., Carr A. M. Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 1;14(23):5812–5823. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hastie N. D. The genetics of Wilms' tumor--a case of disrupted development. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:523–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.002515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Microbial determinations by flow cytometry. J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Aug;113(2):369–375. doi: 10.1099/00221287-113-2-369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin P., Gu Y., Morgan D. O. Role of inhibitory CDC2 phosphorylation in radiation-induced G2 arrest in human cells. J Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;134(4):963–970. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.4.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston G. C., Pringle J. R., Hartwell L. H. Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Mar 1;105(1):79–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kato R., Ogawa H. An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 11;22(15):3104–3112. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma J., Ptashne M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell. 1987 Mar 13;48(5):847–853. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martínez-Pastor M. T., Marchler G., Schüller C., Marchler-Bauer A., Ruis H., Estruch F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J. 1996 May 1;15(9):2227–2235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McNabb D. S., Xing Y., Guarente L. Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 1;9(1):47–58. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murray A. W. The genetics of cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Feb;5(1):5–11. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Murray A. Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;6(6):872–876. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90059-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pati D., Keller C., Groudine M., Plon S. E. Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3037–3046. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paulovich A. G., Hartwell L. H. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):841–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90481-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pays E., Murphy N. B. DNA-binding fingers encoded by a trypanosome retroposon. J Mol Biol. 1987 Sep 5;197(1):147–148. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90617-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Reuter G., Giarre M., Farah J., Gausz J., Spierer A., Spierer P. Dependence of position-effect variegation in Drosophila on dose of a gene encoding an unusual zinc-finger protein. Nature. 1990 Mar 15;344(6263):219–223. doi: 10.1038/344219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanchez Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S. J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmitt A. P., McEntee K. Msn2p, a zinc finger DNA-binding protein, is the transcriptional activator of the multistress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777–5782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siede W., Friedberg A. S., Friedberg E. C. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):7985–7989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Siede W., Nusspaumer G., Portillo V., Rodriguez R., Friedberg E. C. Cloning and characterization of RAD17, a gene controlling cell cycle responses to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 May 1;24(9):1669–1675. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.9.1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stern D. F., Zheng P., Beidler D. R., Zerillo C. Spk1, a new kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, phosphorylates proteins on serine, threonine, and tyrosine. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):987–1001. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun Z., Fay D. S., Marini F., Foiani M., Stern D. F. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):395–406. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Walworth N. C., Bernards R. rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):353–356. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walworth N., Davey S., Beach D. Fission yeast chk1 protein kinase links the rad checkpoint pathway to cdc2. Nature. 1993 May 27;363(6427):368–371. doi: 10.1038/363368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yamamoto A., Guacci V., Koshland D. Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):85–97. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. al-Khodairy F., Fotou E., Sheldrick K. S., Griffiths D. J., Lehmann A. R., Carr A. M. Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Feb;5(2):147–160. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES