Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Dec;150(4):1393–1405. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1393

The yeast protein complex containing cdc68 and pob3 mediates core-promoter repression through the cdc68 N-terminal domain.

D R Evans 1, N K Brewster 1, Q Xu 1, A Rowley 1, B A Altheim 1, G C Johnston 1, R A Singer 1
PMCID: PMC1460419  PMID: 9832518

Abstract

Transcription of nuclear genes usually involves trans-activators, whereas repression is exerted by chromatin. For several genes the transcription mediated by trans-activators and the repression mediated by chromatin depend on the CP complex, a recently described abundant yeast nuclear complex of the Pob3 and Cdc68/Spt16 proteins. We report that the N-terminal third of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc68 protein is dispensable for gene activation but necessary for the maintenance of chromatin repression. The absence of this 300-residue N-terminal domain also decreases the need for the Swi/Snf chromatin-remodeling complex in transcription and confers an Spt- effect characteristic of chromatin alterations. The repression domain, and indeed the entire Cdc68 protein, is highly conserved, as shown by the sequence of the Cdc68 functional homolog from the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis and by database searches. The repression-defective (truncated) form of Cdc68 is stable but less active at high temperatures, whereas the known point-mutant form of Cdc68, encoded by three independent mutant alleles, alters the N-terminal repression domain and destabilizes the mutant protein.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (289.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrams E., Neigeborn L., Carlson M. Molecular analysis of SNF2 and SNF5, genes required for expression of glucose-repressible genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3643–3651. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes C. A. Upf1 and Upf2 proteins mediate normal yeast mRNA degradation when translation initiation is limited. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 May 15;26(10):2433–2441. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.10.2433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bortvin A., Winston F. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science. 1996 Jun 7;272(5267):1473–1476. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5267.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brewster N. K., Johnston G. C., Singer R. A. Characterization of the CP complex, an abundant dimer of Cdc68 and Pob3 proteins that regulates yeast transcriptional activation and chromatin repression. J Biol Chem. 1998 Aug 21;273(34):21972–21979. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.34.21972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairns B. R., Kim Y. J., Sayre M. H., Laurent B. C., Kornberg R. D. A multisubunit complex containing the SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1950–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson M., Botstein D. Two differentially regulated mRNAs with different 5' ends encode secreted with intracellular forms of yeast invertase. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):145–154. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90384-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark-Adams C. D., Norris D., Osley M. A., Fassler J. S., Winston F. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1988 Feb;2(2):150–159. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.2.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark-Adams C. D., Winston F. The SPT6 gene is essential for growth and is required for delta-mediated transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;7(2):679–686. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.2.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frankel A. D., Kim P. S. Modular structure of transcription factors: implications for gene regulation. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):717–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90378-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghislain M., Udvardy A., Mann C. S. cerevisiae 26S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature. 1993 Nov 25;366(6453):358–362. doi: 10.1038/366358a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartzog G. A., Wada T., Handa H., Winston F. Evidence that Spt4, Spt5, and Spt6 control transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):357–369. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill J. E., Myers A. M., Koerner T. J., Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986 Sep;2(3):163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hirschhorn J. N., Brown S. A., Clark C. D., Winston F. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12A):2288–2298. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12a.2288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirschman J. E., Durbin K. J., Winston F. Genetic evidence for promoter competition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):4608–4615. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.4608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacobs C. W., Adams A. E., Szaniszlo P. J., Pringle J. R. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1409–1426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kingston R. E., Bunker C. A., Imbalzano A. N. Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 15;10(8):905–920. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.8.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kruger W., Peterson C. L., Sil A., Coburn C., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N., Herskowitz I. Amino acid substitutions in the structured domains of histones H3 and H4 partially relieve the requirement of the yeast SWI/SNF complex for transcription. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 15;9(22):2770–2779. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.22.2770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kwon H., Imbalzano A. N., Khavari P. A., Kingston R. E., Green M. R. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):477–481. doi: 10.1038/370477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lenfant F., Mann R. K., Thomsen B., Ling X., Grunstein M. All four core histone N-termini contain sequences required for the repression of basal transcription in yeast. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):3974–3985. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li J. J., Herskowitz I. Isolation of ORC6, a component of the yeast origin recognition complex by a one-hybrid system. Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1870–1874. doi: 10.1126/science.8266075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lycan D., Mikesell G., Bunger M., Breeden L. Differential effects of Cdc68 on cell cycle-regulated promoters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7455–7465. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Malone E. A., Clark C. D., Chiang A., Winston F. Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5710–5717. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mierendorf R. C., Pfeffer D. Direct sequencing of denatured plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1987;152:556–562. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)52061-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neigeborn L., Celenza J. L., Carlson M. SSN20 is an essential gene with mutant alleles that suppress defects in SUC2 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;7(2):672–678. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.2.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Neigeborn L., Rubin K., Carlson M. Suppressors of SNF2 mutations restore invertase derepression and cause temperature-sensitive lethality in yeast. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):741–753. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peterson C. L., Dingwall A., Scott M. P. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2905–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peterson C. L., Kruger W., Herskowitz I. A functional interaction between the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and the negative regulator SIN1. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1135–1143. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peterson C. L., Tamkun J. W. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Apr;20(4):143–146. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88990-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prelich G., Winston F. Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):665–676. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rowley A., Singer R. A., Johnston G. C. CDC68, a yeast gene that affects regulation of cell proliferation and transcription, encodes a protein with a highly acidic carboxyl terminus. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5718–5726. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rubin D. M., Coux O., Wefes I., Hengartner C., Young R. A., Goldberg A. L., Finley D. Identification of the gal4 suppressor Sug1 as a subunit of the yeast 26S proteasome. Nature. 1996 Feb 15;379(6566):655–657. doi: 10.1038/379655a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Russel M., Kidd S., Kelley M. R. An improved filamentous helper phage for generating single-stranded plasmid DNA. Gene. 1986;45(3):333–338. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Santisteban M. S., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N., Smith M. M. Histone octamer function in vivo: mutations in the dimer-tetramer interfaces disrupt both gene activation and repression. EMBO J. 1997 May 1;16(9):2493–2506. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarokin L., Carlson M. Upstream region required for regulated expression of the glucose-repressible SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;4(12):2750–2757. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.12.2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scherer S., Davis R. W. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4951–4955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schnell R., D'Ari L., Foss M., Goodman D., Rine J. Genetic and molecular characterization of suppressors of SIR4 mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):29–46. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Swanson M. S., Carlson M., Winston F. SPT6, an essential gene that affects transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes a nuclear protein with an extremely acidic amino terminus. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4935–4941. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wada T., Takagi T., Yamaguchi Y., Ferdous A., Imai T., Hirose S., Sugimoto S., Yano K., Hartzog G. A., Winston F. DSIF, a novel transcription elongation factor that regulates RNA polymerase II processivity, is composed of human Spt4 and Spt5 homologs. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):343–356. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wechser M. A., Kladde M. P., Alfieri J. A., Peterson C. L. Effects of Sin- versions of histone H4 on yeast chromatin structure and function. EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):2086–2095. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wittmeyer J., Formosa T. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit interacts with Cdc68/Spt16 and with Pob3, a protein similar to an HMG1-like protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):4178–4190. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.4178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu Q., Johnston G. C., Singer R. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc68 transcription activator is antagonized by San1, a protein implicated in transcriptional silencing. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7553–7565. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu Q., Singer R. A., Johnston G. C. Sug1 modulates yeast transcription activation by Cdc68. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6025–6035. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES