Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Dec;150(4):1429–1441. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1429

The anatomy of a hypoxic operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

J Deckert 1, A M Torres 1, S M Hwang 1, A J Kastaniotis 1, R S Zitomer 1
PMCID: PMC1460422  PMID: 9832521

Abstract

Aerobic repression of the hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by the DNA-binding protein Rox1 and the Tup1/Ssn6 general repression complex. To determine the DNA sequence requirements for repression, we carried out a mutational analysis of the consensus Rox1-binding site and an analysis of the arrangement of the Rox1 sites into operators in the hypoxic ANB1 gene. We found that single base pair substitutions in the consensus sequence resulted in lower affinities for Rox1, and the decreased affinity of Rox1 for mutant sites correlated with the ability of these sites to repress expression of the hypoxic ANB1 gene. In addition, there was a general but not complete correlation between the strength of repression of a given hypoxic gene and the compliance of the Rox1 sites in that gene to the consensus sequence. An analysis of the ANB1 operators revealed that the two Rox1 sites within an operator acted synergistically in vivo, but that Rox1 did not bind cooperatively in vitro, suggesting the presence of a higher order repression complex in the cell. In addition, the spacing or helical phasing of the Rox1 sites was not important in repression. The differential repression by the two operators of the ANB1 gene was found to be due partly to the location of the operators and partly to the sequences between the two Rox1-binding sites in each. Finally, while Rox1 repression requires the Tup1/Ssn6 general repression complex and this complex has been proposed to require the aminoterminal regions of histones H3 and H4 for full repression of a number of genes, we found that these regions were dispensable for ANB1 repression and the repression of two other hypoxic genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (182.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amillet J. M., Buisson N., Labbe-Bois R. Positive and negative elements involved in the differential regulation by heme and oxygen of the HEM13 gene (coproporphyrinogen oxidase) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1995 Nov;28(6):503–511. doi: 10.1007/BF00518161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balasubramanian B., Lowry C. V., Zitomer R. S. The Rox1 repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hypoxic genes is a specific DNA-binding protein with a high-mobility-group motif. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):6071–6078. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourot S., Karst F. Isolation and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUT1 gene involved in sterol uptake. Gene. 1995 Nov 7;165(1):97–102. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00478-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper J. P., Roth S. Y., Simpson R. T. The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 15;8(12):1400–1410. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.12.1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deckert J., Perini R., Balasubramanian B., Zitomer R. S. Multiple elements and auto-repression regulate Rox1, a repressor of hypoxic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1149–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edmondson D. G., Smith M. M., Roth S. Y. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 1996 May 15;10(10):1247–1259. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.10.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujita A., Matsumoto S., Kuhara S., Misumi Y., Kobayashi H. Cloning of the yeast SFL2 gene: its disruption results in pleiotropic phenotypes characteristic for tup1 mutants. Gene. 1990 Apr 30;89(1):93–99. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90210-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein A., Lampen J. O. Beta-D-fructofuranoside fructohydrolase from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1975;42:504–511. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(75)42159-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grosschedl R., Giese K., Pagel J. HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. Trends Genet. 1994 Mar;10(3):94–100. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90232-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harley V. R., Lovell-Badge R., Goodfellow P. N. Definition of a consensus DNA binding site for SRY. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Apr 25;22(8):1500–1501. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.8.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hodge M. R., Singh K., Cumsky M. G. Upstream activation and repression elements control transcription of the yeast COX5b gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5510–5520. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Komachi K., Redd M. J., Johnson A. D. The WD repeats of Tup1 interact with the homeo domain protein alpha 2. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 1;8(23):2857–2867. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lowry C. V., Cerdán M. E., Zitomer R. S. A hypoxic consensus operator and a constitutive activation region regulate the ANB1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5921–5926. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lowry C. V., Zitomer R. S. ROX1 encodes a heme-induced repression factor regulating ANB1 and CYC7 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):4651–4658. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.4651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matallana E., Franco L., Pérez-Ortín J. E. Chromatin structure of the yeast SUC2 promoter in regulatory mutants. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Feb;231(3):395–400. doi: 10.1007/BF00292708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mukai Y., Harashima S., Oshima Y. AAR1/TUP1 protein, with a structure similar to that of the beta subunit of G proteins, is required for a1-alpha 2 and alpha 2 repression in cell type control of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3773–3779. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Redd M. J., Arnaud M. B., Johnson A. D. A complex composed of tup1 and ssn6 represses transcription in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1997 Apr 25;272(17):11193–11197. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.17.11193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roth S. Y., Dean A., Simpson R. T. Yeast alpha 2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2247–2260. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabová L., Zeman I., Supek F., Kolarov J. Transcriptional control of AAC3 gene encoding mitochondrial ADP/ATP translocator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by oxygen, heme and ROX1 factor. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Apr 1;213(1):547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shimizu M., Roth S. Y., Szent-Gyorgyi C., Simpson R. T. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the alpha 2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3033–3041. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stukey J. E., McDonough V. M., Martin C. E. The OLE1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes the delta 9 fatty acid desaturase and can be functionally replaced by the rat stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 25;265(33):20144–20149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Teunissen A. W., van den Berg J. A., Steensma H. Y. Transcriptional regulation of flocculation genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1995 Apr 30;11(5):435–446. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thorsness M., Schafer W., D'Ari L., Rine J. Positive and negative transcriptional control by heme of genes encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5702–5712. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Treitel M. A., Carlson M. Repression by SSN6-TUP1 is directed by MIG1, a repressor/activator protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3132–3136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Trumbly R. J. Cloning and characterization of the CYC8 gene mediating glucose repression in yeast. Gene. 1988 Dec 15;73(1):97–111. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90316-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Turi T. G., Loper J. C. Multiple regulatory elements control expression of the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome P450, lanosterol 14 alpha-demethylase (ERG11). J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 25;267(3):2046–2056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tzamarias D., Struhl K. Distinct TPR motifs of Cyc8 are involved in recruiting the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor complex to differentially regulated promoters. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 1;9(7):821–831. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.7.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams F. E., Trumbly R. J. Characterization of TUP1, a mediator of glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;10(12):6500–6511. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.12.6500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang M., Rosenblum-Vos L. S., Lowry C. V., Boakye K. A., Zitomer R. S. A yeast protein with homology to the beta-subunit of G proteins is involved in control of heme-regulated and catabolite-repressed genes. Gene. 1991 Jan 15;97(2):153–161. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90047-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. Isolation of crt mutants constitutive for transcription of the DNA damage inducible gene RNR3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):851–866. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zitomer R. S., Carrico P., Deckert J. Regulation of hypoxic gene expression in yeast. Kidney Int. 1997 Feb;51(2):507–513. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zitomer R. S., Limbach M. P., Rodriguez-Torres A. M., Balasubramanian B., Deckert J., Snow P. M. Approaches to the study of Rox1 repression of the hypoxic genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods. 1997 Mar;11(3):279–288. doi: 10.1006/meth.1996.0422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zitomer R. S., Lowry C. V. Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1992 Mar;56(1):1–11. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.1-11.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zitomer R. S., Sellers J. W., McCarter D. W., Hastings G. A., Wick P., Lowry C. V. Elements involved in oxygen regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CYC7 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;7(6):2212–2220. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.6.2212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van de Wetering M., Clevers H. Sequence-specific interaction of the HMG box proteins TCF-1 and SRY occurs within the minor groove of a Watson-Crick double helix. EMBO J. 1992 Aug;11(8):3039–3044. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES