Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Dec;150(4):1567–1575. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1567

Negative covariance suggests mutation bias in a two-locus microsatellite system in the fish Sparus aurata.

E T Dermitzakis 1, A G Clark 1, C Batargias 1, A Magoulas 1, E Zouros 1
PMCID: PMC1460435  PMID: 9832532

Abstract

Constraints on microsatellite length appear to vary in a species-specific manner. We know very little about the nature of these constraints and why they should vary among species. While surveying microsatellite variation in the Mediterranean gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata, we discovered an unusual pattern of covariation between two closely linked microsatellite loci. One- and two-locus haplotypes were scored from PCR amplification products of each locus separately and both loci together. In a sample of 211 fish, there was a strong negative covariance in repeat number between the two loci, which suggests a mechanism that maintains the combined length below a constrained size. In addition, there were two clusters of the same combined haplotype length, one consisting of a long repeat array at one locus and a short array at the other and vice versa. We demonstrate that several models of biased mutation or natural selection, in theory, could generate this pattern of covariance. The common feature of all the models is the idea that tightly linked microsatellites do not evolve in complete independence, and that whatever size dependence there is to the process, it appears to "read" the combined size of the two loci.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos W., Sawcer S. J., Feakes R. W., Rubinsztein D. C. Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat Genet. 1996 Aug;13(4):390–391. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The evolution of restricted recombination and the accumulation of repeated DNA sequences. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):947–962. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlesworth B., Sniegowski P., Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994 Sep 15;371(6494):215–220. doi: 10.1038/371215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Estoup A., Garnery L., Solignac M., Cornuet J. M. Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):679–695. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldman M. W., Bergman A., Pollock D. D., Goldstein D. B. Microsatellite genetic distances with range constraints: analytic description and problems of estimation. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):207–216. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garza J. C., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jul;12(4):594–603. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein D. B., Clark A. G. Microsatellite variation in North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Oct 11;23(19):3882–3886. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.19.3882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein D. B., Pollock D. D. Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic interference. J Hered. 1997 Sep-Oct;88(5):335–342. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6723–6727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Magoulas A., Sophronides K., Patarnello T., Hatzilaris E., Zouros E. Mitochondrial DNA variation in an experimental stock of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1995 Jun;4(2):110–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitton J. B., Koehn R. K. Population genetics of marine pelecypods. 3. Epistasis between functionally related isoenzymes of Mytilus edulis. Genetics. 1973 Mar;73(3):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.3.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pritchard J. K., Feldman M. W. Statistics for microsatellite variation based on coalescence. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Dec;50(3):325–344. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rubinsztein D. C., Amos W., Leggo J., Goodburn S., Jain S., Li S. H., Margolis R. L., Ross C. A., Ferguson-Smith M. A. Microsatellite evolution--evidence for directionality and variation in rate between species. Nat Genet. 1995 Jul;10(3):337–343. doi: 10.1038/ng0795-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schlötterer C., Vogl C., Tautz D. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):309–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schug M. D., Mackay T. F., Aquadro C. F. Low mutation rates of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):99–102. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Takezaki N., Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):389–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):737–749. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weber J. L., Wong C. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1123–1128. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.8.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weir B. S. Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics. 1979 Mar;35(1):235–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wierdl M., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):769–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhivotovsky L. A., Feldman M. W., Grishechkin S. A. Biased mutations and microsatellite variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Sep;14(9):926–933. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES