Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Aug 1;24(15):3010–3016. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.15.3010

Selection of the best target site for ribozyme-mediated cleavage within a fusion gene for adenovirus E1A-associated 300 kDa protein (p300) and luciferase.

H Kawasaki 1, J Ohkawa 1, N Tanishige 1, K Yoshinari 1, T Murata 1, K K Yokoyama 1, K Taira 1
PMCID: PMC146048  PMID: 8760887

Abstract

The cellular 300 kDa protein known as p300 is a target for the adenoviral E1A oncoprotein and it is thought to participate in prevention of the G0/G1 transition during the cell cycle, in activation of certain enhancers and in the stimulation of differentiation pathways. In order to determine the exact function of p300, as a first step we constructed a simple assay system for the selection of a potential target site of a hammerhead ribozyme in vivo. For the detection of ribozyme-mediated cleavage, we used a fusion gene (p300-luc) that consisted of the sequence encoding the N-terminal region of p300 and the gene for luciferase, as the reporter gene. We were also interested in the correlation of the GUX rule, for the triplet adjacent to the cleavage site, with ribozyme activity in vivo. Therefore, we selected five target sites that all included GUX The rank order of activities in vitro indeed followed the GUX rule; with respect to the kcat, a C residue as the third base (X) was the best, next came an A residue and a U residue was the worst (GUC > GUA > GUU). However, in vivo the tRNA(Val) promoter-driven ribozyme, targeted to a GUA located upstream of the initiation codon, had the highest inhibitory effect (96%) in HeLa S3 cells when the molar ratio of the DNA template for the target p300 RNA to that for the ribozyme was 1:4. Since the rank order of activities in vivo did not conform to the GUX rule, it is unlikely that the rate limiting step for cleavage of the p300-luc mRNA was the chemical step. This kind of ribozyme expression system should be extremely useful for elucidation of the function of p300 in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abraham S. E., Lobo S., Yaciuk P., Wang H. G., Moran E. p300, and p300-associated proteins, are components of TATA-binding protein (TBP) complexes. Oncogene. 1993 Jun;8(6):1639–1647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alam J., Cook J. L. Reporter genes: application to the study of mammalian gene transcription. Anal Biochem. 1990 Aug 1;188(2):245–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90601-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altman S. RNA enzyme-directed gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):10898–10900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.10898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arany Z., Newsome D., Oldread E., Livingston D. M., Eckner R. A family of transcriptional adaptor proteins targeted by the E1A oncoprotein. Nature. 1995 Mar 2;374(6517):81–84. doi: 10.1038/374081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arany Z., Sellers W. R., Livingston D. M., Eckner R. E1A-associated p300 and CREB-associated CBP belong to a conserved family of coactivators. Cell. 1994 Jun 17;77(6):799–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90127-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bratty J., Chartrand P., Ferbeyre G., Cedergren R. The hammerhead RNA domain, a model ribozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Dec 14;1216(3):345–359. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(93)90001-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomczynski P., Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987 Apr;162(1):156–159. doi: 10.1006/abio.1987.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chrivia J. C., Kwok R. P., Lamb N., Hagiwara M., Montminy M. R., Goodman R. H. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature. 1993 Oct 28;365(6449):855–859. doi: 10.1038/365855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cotten M., Birnstiel M. L. Ribozyme mediated destruction of RNA in vivo. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 1;8(12):3861–3866. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08564.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dahm S. C., Derrick W. B., Uhlenbeck O. C. Evidence for the role of solvated metal hydroxide in the hammerhead cleavage mechanism. Biochemistry. 1993 Dec 7;32(48):13040–13045. doi: 10.1021/bi00211a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eckner R., Ewen M. E., Newsome D., Gerdes M., DeCaprio J. A., Lawrence J. B., Livingston D. M. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the adenovirus E1A-associated 300-kD protein (p300) reveals a protein with properties of a transcriptional adaptor. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 15;8(8):869–884. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.8.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng M., Cabrera G., Deshane J., Scanlon K. J., Curiel D. T. Neoplastic reversion accomplished by high efficiency adenoviral-mediated delivery of an anti-ras ribozyme. Cancer Res. 1995 May 15;55(10):2024–2028. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Forster A. C., Symons R. H. Self-cleavage of plus and minus RNAs of a virusoid and a structural model for the active sites. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):211–220. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geiduschek E. P., Tocchini-Valentini G. P. Transcription by RNA polymerase III. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:873–914. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.004301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harlow E., Whyte P., Franza B. R., Jr, Schley C. Association of adenovirus early-region 1A proteins with cellular polypeptides. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 May;6(5):1579–1589. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.5.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haseloff J., Gerlach W. L. Sequences required for self-catalysed cleavage of the satellite RNA of tobacco ringspot virus. Gene. 1989 Oct 15;82(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haseloff J., Gerlach W. L. Simple RNA enzymes with new and highly specific endoribonuclease activities. Nature. 1988 Aug 18;334(6183):585–591. doi: 10.1038/334585a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hertel K. J., Pardi A., Uhlenbeck O. C., Koizumi M., Ohtsuka E., Uesugi S., Cedergren R., Eckstein F., Gerlach W. L., Hodgson R. Numbering system for the hammerhead. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jun 25;20(12):3252–3252. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.12.3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Homann M., Tabler M., Tzortzakaki S., Sczakiel G. Extension of helix II of an HIV-1-directed hammerhead ribozyme with long antisense flanks does not alter kinetic parameters in vitro but causes loss of the inhibitory potential in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Sep 25;22(19):3951–3957. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.19.3951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Inokuchi Y., Yuyama N., Hirashima A., Nishikawa S., Ohkawa J., Taira K. A hammerhead ribozyme inhibits the proliferation of an RNA coliphage SP in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 15;269(15):11361–11366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacks T., Fazeli A., Schmitt E. M., Bronson R. T., Goodell M. A., Weinberg R. A. Effects of an Rb mutation in the mouse. Nature. 1992 Sep 24;359(6393):295–300. doi: 10.1038/359295a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kitabayashi I., Eckner R., Arany Z., Chiu R., Gachelin G., Livingston D. M., Yokoyama K. K. Phosphorylation of the adenovirus E1A-associated 300 kDa protein in response to retinoic acid and E1A during the differentiation of F9 cells. EMBO J. 1995 Jul 17;14(14):3496–3509. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07356.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kwok R. P., Lundblad J. R., Chrivia J. C., Richards J. P., Bächinger H. P., Brennan R. G., Roberts S. G., Green M. R., Goodman R. H. Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB. Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):223–226. doi: 10.1038/370223a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lane D. P. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 1992 Jul 2;358(6381):15–16. doi: 10.1038/358015a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Long D. M., Uhlenbeck O. C. Kinetic characterization of intramolecular and intermolecular hammerhead RNAs with stem II deletions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6977–6981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lundblad J. R., Kwok R. P., Laurance M. E., Harter M. L., Goodman R. H. Adenoviral E1A-associated protein p300 as a functional homologue of the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Nature. 1995 Mar 2;374(6517):85–88. doi: 10.1038/374085a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marschall P., Thomson J. B., Eckstein F. Inhibition of gene expression with ribozymes. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1994 Oct;14(5):523–538. doi: 10.1007/BF02088835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McMaster G. K., Carmichael G. G. Analysis of single- and double-stranded nucleic acids on polyacrylamide and agarose gels by using glyoxal and acridine orange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4835–4838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohkawa J., Koguma T., Kohda T., Taira K. Ribozymes: from mechanistic studies to applications in vivo. J Biochem. 1995 Aug;118(2):251–258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Piccirilli J. A., Vyle J. S., Caruthers M. H., Cech T. R. Metal ion catalysis in the Tetrahymena ribozyme reaction. Nature. 1993 Jan 7;361(6407):85–88. doi: 10.1038/361085a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pyle A. M. Ribozymes: a distinct class of metalloenzymes. Science. 1993 Aug 6;261(5122):709–714. doi: 10.1126/science.7688142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rossi J. J. Controlled, targeted, intracellular expression of ribozymes: progress and problems. Trends Biotechnol. 1995 Aug;13(8):301–306. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88969-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruffner D. E., Stormo G. D., Uhlenbeck O. C. Sequence requirements of the hammerhead RNA self-cleavage reaction. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 27;29(47):10695–10702. doi: 10.1021/bi00499a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sawata S., Shimayama T., Komiyama M., Kumar P. K., Nishikawa S., Taira K. Enhancement of the cleavage rates of DNA-armed hammerhead ribozymes by various divalent metal ions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Dec 11;21(24):5656–5660. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.24.5656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheldon C. C., Symons R. H. Mutagenesis analysis of a self-cleaving RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 25;17(14):5679–5685. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.14.5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shimayama T., Nishikawa F., Nishikawa S., Taira K. Nuclease-resistant chimeric ribozymes containing deoxyribonucleotides and phosphorothioate linkages. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jun 11;21(11):2605–2611. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.11.2605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shimayama T., Nishikawa S., Taira K. Generality of the NUX rule: kinetic analysis of the results of systematic mutations in the trinucleotide at the cleavage site of hammerhead ribozymes. Biochemistry. 1995 Mar 21;34(11):3649–3654. doi: 10.1021/bi00011a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Steitz T. A., Steitz J. A. A general two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15;90(14):6498–6502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun L. Q., Wang L., Gerlach W. L., Symonds G. Target sequence-specific inhibition of HIV-1 replication by ribozymes directed to tat RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Aug 11;23(15):2909–2913. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.15.2909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tang X. B., Hobom G., Luo D. Ribozyme mediated destruction of influenza A virus in vitro and in vivo. J Med Virol. 1994 Apr;42(4):385–395. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890420411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Uchimaru T., Uebayasi M., Tanabe K., Taira K. Theoretical analyses on the role of Mg2+ ions in ribozyme reactions. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):137–142. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.8422960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Uhlenbeck O. C. A small catalytic oligoribonucleotide. Nature. 1987 Aug 13;328(6131):596–600. doi: 10.1038/328596a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang H. G., Rikitake Y., Carter M. C., Yaciuk P., Abraham S. E., Zerler B., Moran E. Identification of specific adenovirus E1A N-terminal residues critical to the binding of cellular proteins and to the control of cell growth. J Virol. 1993 Jan;67(1):476–488. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.1.476-488.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yarus M. How many catalytic RNAs? Ions and the Cheshire cat conjecture. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):31–39. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.8422972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao J. J., Pick L. Generating loss-of-function phenotypes of the fushi tarazu gene with a targeted ribozyme in Drosophila. Nature. 1993 Sep 30;365(6445):448–451. doi: 10.1038/365448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zoumadakis M., Tabler M. Comparative analysis of cleavage rates after systematic permutation of the NUX consensus target motif for hammerhead ribozymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Apr 11;23(7):1192–1196. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.7.1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES