Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Feb;151(2):797–801. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.797

The use of microsatellite variation to infer population structure and demographic history in a natural model system.

D B Goldstein 1, G W Roemer 1, D A Smith 1, D E Reich 1, A Bergman 1, R K Wayne 1
PMCID: PMC1460481  PMID: 9927470

Abstract

To assess the reliability of genetic markers it is important to compare inferences that are based on them to a priori expectations. In this article we present an analysis of microsatellite variation within and among populations of island foxes (Urocyon littoralis) on California's Channel Islands. We first show that microsatellite variation at a moderate number of loci (19) can provide an essentially perfect description of the boundaries between populations and an accurate representation of their historical relationships. We also show that the pattern of variation across unlinked microsatellite loci can be used to test whether population size has been constant or increasing. Application of these approaches to the island fox system indicates that microsatellite variation may carry considerably more information about population history than is currently being used.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bowcock A. M., Ruiz-Linares A., Tomfohrde J., Minch E., Kidd J. R., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):455–457. doi: 10.1038/368455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilbert D. A., Lehman N., O'Brien S. J., Wayne R. K. Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox. Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):764–767. doi: 10.1038/344764a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein D. B., Pollock D. D. Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic interference. J Hered. 1997 Sep-Oct;88(5):335–342. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):463–471. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6723–6727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldstein D. B., Zhivotovsky L. A., Nayar K., Linares A. R., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Statistical properties of the variation at linked microsatellite loci: implications for the history of human Y chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Nov;13(9):1213–1218. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moran P. A. Wandering distributions and the electrophoretic profile. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Dec;8(3):318–330. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nee S., Holmes E. C., Rambaut A., Harvey P. H. Inferring population history from molecular phylogenies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 29;349(1327):25–31. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ostrander E. A., Sprague G. F., Jr, Rine J. Identification and characterization of dinucleotide repeat (CA)n markers for genetic mapping in dog. Genomics. 1993 Apr;16(1):207–213. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rogers A. R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):552–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takezaki N., Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):389–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhivotovsky L. A., Feldman M. W. Microsatellite variability and genetic distances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11549–11552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES