Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Feb;151(2):597–604. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.597

A mutation in the flanking 5'-TA-3' dinucleotide prevents excision of an internal eliminated sequence from the Paramecium tetraurelia genome.

K M Mayer 1, J D Forney 1
PMCID: PMC1460486  PMID: 9927454

Abstract

The germline chromosomes in Paramecium and other ciliated protozoa contain regions of DNA that are excised and eliminated during the development of a new macronuclear genome. Paramecium tetraurelia internal eliminated sequences (IESs) are invariably flanked by a 5'-TA-3' dinucleotide sequence that is part of a larger 8-bp terminal inverted-repeat consensus sequence. Both features, the absolutely conserved 5'-TA-3' and the remaining 6-bp terminal inverted repeat, are shared with the mariner/Tc1 class of transposons. In this article we describe a mutant cell line (AIM-2) defective in excision of a single IES from the coding region of the A51 surface antigen gene. Excision of the 370-bp IES6649 is prevented by a single A to G transition in the invariably conserved 5'-TA-3' dinucleotide. Failure to excise IES6649 also revealed a 29-bp IES located inside IES6649. Additional experiments with the previously isolated AIM-1 mutant, which also contains an internal IES, shows that alternate excision using the wild-type end of IES2591 with an end from the internal IES is extremely rare or nonexistent. These results indicate that IESs are discrete elements whose excision depends upon nucleotides located within the consensus sequence, but also suggest that additional information is required to match one end of an IES with its excision partner.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baird S. E., Fino G. M., Tausta S. L., Klobutcher L. A. Micronuclear genome organization in Euplotes crassus: a transposonlike element is removed during macronuclear development. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;9(9):3793–3807. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.9.3793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan G., Garza D., Hartl D. Insertion and excision of the transposable element mariner in Drosophila. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):103–114. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne R. S., Chalker D. L., Yao M. C. Genome downsizing during ciliate development: nuclear division of labor through chromosome restructuring. Annu Rev Genet. 1996;30:557–578. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dubrana K., Le Mouël A., Amar L. Deletion endpoint allele-specificity in the developmentally regulated elimination of an internal sequence (IES) in Paramecium. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Jun 15;25(12):2448–2454. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.12.2448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duharcourt S., Keller A. M., Meyer E. Homology-dependent maternal inhibition of developmental excision of internal eliminated sequences in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):7075–7085. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.12.7075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Epstein L. M., Forney J. D. Mendelian and non-mendelian mutations affecting surface antigen expression in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1583–1590. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forney J. D., Blackburn E. H. Developmentally controlled telomere addition in wild-type and mutant paramecia. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jan;8(1):251–258. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.1.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Godiska R., James C., Yao M. C. A distant 10-bp sequence specifies the boundaries of a programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12A):2357–2365. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobs M. E., Klobutcher L. A. The long and the short of developmental DNA deletion in Euplotes crassus. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996 Nov-Dec;43(6):442–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb04503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jahn C. L., Doktor S. Z., Frels J. S., Jaraczewski J. W., Krikau M. F. Structures of the Euplotes crassus Tec1 and Tec2 elements: identification of putative transposase coding regions. Gene. 1993 Oct 29;133(1):71–78. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90226-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaraczewski J. W., Frels J. S., Jahn C. L. Developmentally regulated, low abundance Tec element transcripts in Euplotes crassus--implications for DNA elimination and transposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Oct 25;22(21):4535–4542. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.21.4535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klobutcher L. A., Herrick G. Consensus inverted terminal repeat sequence of Paramecium IESs: resemblance to termini of Tc1-related and Euplotes Tec transposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jun 11;23(11):2006–2013. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.11.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klobutcher L. A., Herrick G. Developmental genome reorganization in ciliated protozoa: the transposon link. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1997;56:1–62. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)61001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Klobutcher L. A., Jahn C. L. Developmentally controlled genomic rearrangements in ciliated protozoa. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991 Oct;1(3):397–403. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krikau M. F., Jahn C. L. Tec2, a second transposon-like element demonstrating developmentally programmed excision in Euplotes crassus. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4751–4759. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lohe A. R., Hartl D. L. Reduced germline mobility of a mariner vector containing exogenous DNA: effect of size or site? Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1299–1306. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mayer K. M., Mikami K., Forney J. D. A mutation in Paramecium tetraurelia reveals functional and structural features of developmentally excised DNA elements. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):139–149. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Plasterk R. H. The Tc1/mariner transposon family. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;204:125–143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79795-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prescott D. M. The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jun;58(2):233–267. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.2.233-267.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vayssié L., Sperling L., Madeddu L. Characterization of multigene families in the micronuclear genome of Paramecium tetraurelia reveals a germline specific sequence in an intron of a centrin gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Mar 1;25(5):1036–1041. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vos J. C., De Baere I., Plasterk R. H. Transposase is the only nematode protein required for in vitro transposition of Tc1. Genes Dev. 1996 Mar 15;10(6):755–761. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.6.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Luenen H. G., Colloms S. D., Plasterk R. H. The mechanism of transposition of Tc3 in C. elegans. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):293–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90198-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Pouderoyen G., Ketting R. F., Perrakis A., Plasterk R. H., Sixma T. K. Crystal structure of the specific DNA-binding domain of Tc3 transposase of C.elegans in complex with transposon DNA. EMBO J. 1997 Oct 1;16(19):6044–6054. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.19.6044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES