Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Mar;151(3):1127–1141. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.3.1127

Mechanisms of double-strand-break repair during gene targeting in mammalian cells.

P Ng 1, M D Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1460530  PMID: 10049929

Abstract

In the present study, the mechanism of double-strand-break (DSB) repair during gene targeting at the chromosomal immunoglobulin mu-locus in a murine hybridoma was examined. The gene-targeting assay utilized specially designed insertion vectors genetically marked in the region of homology to the chromosomal mu-locus by six diagnostic restriction enzyme site markers. The restriction enzyme markers permitted the contribution of vector-borne and chromosomal mu-sequences in the recombinant product to be determined. The use of the insertion vectors in conjunction with a plating procedure in which individual integrative homologous recombination events were retained for analysis revealed several important features about the mammalian DSB repair process:The presence of the markers within the region of shared homology did not affect the efficiency of gene targeting.In the majority of recombinants, the vector-borne marker proximal to the DSB was absent, being replaced with the corresponding chromosomal restriction enzyme site. This result is consistent with either formation and repair of a vector-borne gap or an "end" bias in mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) that favored the chromosomal sequence. Formation of hDNA was frequently associated with gene targeting and, in most cases, began approximately 645 bp from the DSB and could encompass a distance of at least 1469 bp.The hDNA was efficiently repaired prior to DNA replication.The repair of adjacent mismatches in hDNA occurred predominantly on the same strand, suggesting the involvement of a long-patch repair mechanism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (273.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adair G. M., Nairn R. S., Wilson J. H., Seidman M. M., Brotherman K. A., MacKinnon C., Scheerer J. B. Targeted homologous recombination at the endogenous adenine phosphoribosyltransferase locus in Chinese hamster cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(12):4574–4578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Genetic and molecular analysis of recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurring in the presence of the hyper-recombination mutation hpr1. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):503–517. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):683–694. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahn B. Y., Livingston D. M. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3685–3693. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aratani Y., Okazaki R., Koyama H. End extension repair of introduced targeting vectors mediated by homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 25;20(18):4795–4801. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.18.4795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker M. D. High-frequency homologous recombination between duplicate chromosomal immunoglobulin mu heavy-chain constant regions. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5500–5507. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker M. D., Pennell N., Bosnoyan L., Shulman M. J. Homologous recombination can restore normal immunoglobulin production in a mutant hybridoma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6432–6436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker M. D., Read L. R. Analysis of mutations introduced into the chromosomal immunoglobulin mu gene. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1993 Jul;19(4):299–311. doi: 10.1007/BF01232743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker M. D., Read L. R. Ectopic recombination within homologous immunoglobulin mu gene constant regions in a mouse hybridoma cell line. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4422–4432. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumann B., Potash M. J., Köhler G. Consequences of frameshift mutations at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus of the mouse. EMBO J. 1985 Feb;4(2):351–359. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03636.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. One-sided invasion events in homologous recombination at double-strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;314(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berinstein N., Pennell N., Ottaway C. A., Shulman M. J. Gene replacement with one-sided homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;12(1):360–367. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.1.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bollag R. J., Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:199–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brinster R. L., Braun R. E., Lo D., Avarbock M. R., Oram F., Palmiter R. D. Targeted correction of a major histocompatibility class II E alpha gene by DNA microinjected into mouse eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(18):7087–7091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.7087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carpenter A. T. Meiotic roles of crossing-over and of gene conversion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:23–29. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng C., Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Location of crossovers during gene targeting with insertion and replacement vectors. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2134–2140. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA intermediates of extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):400–406. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Site-directed mutagenesis of virtually any plasmid by eliminating a unique site. Anal Biochem. 1992 Jan;200(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90280-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Doetschman T., Maeda N., Smithies O. Targeted mutation of the Hprt gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(22):8583–8587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Donoho G., Jasin M., Berg P. Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jul;18(7):4070–4078. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.7.4070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Elliott B., Richardson C., Winderbaum J., Nickoloff J. A., Jasin M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):93–101. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis J., Bernstein A. Gene targeting with retroviral vectors: recombination by gene conversion into regions of nonhomology. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;9(4):1621–1627. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferguson D. O., Holloman W. K. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5419–5424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbertson L. A., Stahl F. W. A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):27–41. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Godwin A. R., Liskay R. M. The effects of insertions on mammalian intrachromosomal recombination. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):607–617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gross-Bellard M., Oudet P., Chambon P. Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA from mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem. 1973 Jul 2;36(1):32–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Bradley A. Gene conversion during vector insertion in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jun 11;23(11):2058–2064. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.11.2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Bradley A. The role and fate of DNA ends for homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;12(6):2464–2474. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.6.2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Chang C., Bradley A. Target frequency and integration pattern for insertion and replacement vectors in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4509–4517. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jasin M., Berg P. Homologous integration in mammalian cells without target gene selection. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1353–1363. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang L., Connor A., Shulman M. J. Effects of mutation position on frequency of marker rescue by homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3609–3613. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Köhler G., Potash M. J., Lehrach H., Shulman M. J. Deletions in immunoglobulin mu chains. EMBO J. 1982;1(5):555–563. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01208.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller E. M., Hough H. L., Cho J. W., Nickoloff J. A. Mismatch repair by efficient nick-directed, and less efficient mismatch-specific, mechanisms in homologous recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):743–753. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Modrich P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ng P., Baker M. D. High efficiency site-specific modification of the chromosomal immunoglobulin locus by gene targeting. J Immunol Methods. 1998 May 1;214(1-2):81–96. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ng P., Baker M. D. The molecular basis of multiple vector insertion by gene targeting in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1999 Mar;151(3):1143–1155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.3.1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Orr-Weaver T. L., Nicolas A., Szostak J. W. Gene conversion adjacent to regions of double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5292–5298. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap repair and crossing-over. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4417–4421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pennington S. L., Wilson J. H. Gene targeting in Chinese hamster ovary cells is conservative. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9498–9502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfeiffer P., Thode S., Hancke J., Vielmetter W. Mechanisms of overlap formation in nonhomologous DNA end joining. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):888–895. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Richard M., Gusew N., Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. Homologous junctions formed between a vector and human genomic repetitive LINE-1 elements as a result of one-sided invasion. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1997 Jan;23(1):75–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02679957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shulman M. J., Nissen L., Collins C. Homologous recombination in hybridoma cells: dependence on time and fragment length. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4466–4472. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Smithies O., Kim H. S. Targeted gene duplication and disruption for analyzing quantitative genetic traits in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3612–3615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Song K. Y., Schwartz F., Maeda N., Smithies O., Kucherlapati R. Accurate modification of a chromosomal plasmid by homologous recombination in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(19):6820–6824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Steeg C. M., Ellis J., Bernstein A. Introduction of specific point mutations into RNA polymerase II by gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells: evidence for a DNA mismatch repair mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4680–4684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Introduction of homologous DNA sequences into mammalian cells induces mutations in the cognate gene. Nature. 1986 Nov 6;324(6092):34–38. doi: 10.1038/324034a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomas K. R., Folger K. R., Capecchi M. R. High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419–428. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Valancius V., Smithies O. Double-strand gap repair in a mammalian gene targeting reaction. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4389–4397. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5350–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Weng Y. S., Nickoloff J. A. Evidence for independent mismatch repair processing on opposite sides of a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):59–70. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES