Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Aug 1;24(15):3093–3099. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.15.3093

Hyper-negative template DNA supercoiling during transcription of the tetracycline-resistance gene in topA mutants is largely constrained in vivo.

A C Albert 1, F Spirito 1, N Figueroa-Bossi 1, L Bossi 1, A R Rahmouni 1
PMCID: PMC146055  PMID: 8760899

Abstract

The excess linking deficit of plasmid DNA from topoisomerase I-defective bacteria (topA mutants) results mainly from transcription and is commonly ascribed to unbalanced relaxation of transcription-induced twin-supercoiled domains. This defect is aggravated in genes for membrane-binding proteins (such as the tet gene) where anchoring of the transcription complex to the bacterial membrane is thought to enhance twin-domain partitioning. Thus, it is often assumed that the 'hyper-negative' linking difference of plasmid DNA from topA mutants reflects unconstrained, hyper-negative DNA supercoiling inside the cell. We tested the validity of this assumption in the present study. A DNA sequence that undergoes a gradual B to Z transition under increasing negative superhelical tension was used as a sensor of unconstrained negative supercoiling. Z-DNA formation was probed at a site upstream from the inducible pTac promoter fused either to the tet gene or to the gene for cytosolic chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat). Although plasmid DNA linking deficit increased more extensively in topA mutants following tet activation than following cat activation, no significant differences were observed in the extents to which the B to Z DNA transition is stimulated in the two cases. We infer that the excess linking deficit of the tet-containing plasmid DNA reflects constrained negative DNA supercoiling inside the cell.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert A. C., Roman A. M., Bouche G., Leng M., Rahmouni A. R. Gradual and oriented B-Z transition in 5'-untranscribed region of mouse ribosomal DNA. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jul 29;269(30):19238–19244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amouyal M., Buc H. Topological unwinding of strong and weak promoters by RNA polymerase. A comparison between the lac wild-type and the UV5 sites of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 20;195(4):795–808. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90485-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowater R. P., Chen D., Lilley D. M. Elevated unconstrained supercoiling of plasmid DNA generated by transcription and translation of the tetracycline resistance gene in eubacteria. Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 9;33(31):9266–9275. doi: 10.1021/bi00197a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowater R. P., Chen D., Lilley D. M. Modulation of tyrT promoter activity by template supercoiling in vivo. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 1;13(23):5647–5655. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06903.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brosius J. Plasmid vectors for the selection of promoters. Gene. 1984 Feb;27(2):151–160. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen D., Bowater R. P., Lilley D. M. Activation of the leu-500 promoter: a topological domain generated by divergent transcription in a plasmid. Biochemistry. 1993 Dec 7;32(48):13162–13170. doi: 10.1021/bi00211a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen D., Bowater R., Dorman C. J., Lilley D. M. Activity of a plasmid-borne leu-500 promoter depends on the transcription and translation of an adjacent gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 15;89(18):8784–8788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dayn A., Malkhosyan S., Mirkin S. M. Transcriptionally driven cruciform formation in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Nov 25;20(22):5991–5997. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.22.5991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drolet M., Bi X., Liu L. F. Hypernegative supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription elongation in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 21;269(3):2068–2074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drolet M., Phoenix P., Menzel R., Massé E., Liu L. F., Crouch R. J. Overexpression of RNase H partially complements the growth defect of an Escherichia coli delta topA mutant: R-loop formation is a major problem in the absence of DNA topoisomerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3526–3530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Figueroa N., Bossi L. Transcription induces gyration of the DNA template in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9416–9420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gamper H. B., Hearst J. E. A topological model for transcription based on unwinding angle analysis of E. coli RNA polymerase binary, initiation and ternary complexes. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):81–90. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haniford D. B., Pulleyblank D. E. The in-vivo occurrence of Z DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1983 Dec;1(3):593–609. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1983.10507467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iost I., Dreyfus M. The stability of Escherichia coli lacZ mRNA depends upon the simultaneity of its synthesis and translation. EMBO J. 1995 Jul 3;14(13):3252–3261. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07328.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaworski A., Higgins N. P., Wells R. D., Zacharias W. Topoisomerase mutants and physiological conditions control supercoiling and Z-DNA formation in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 5;266(4):2576–2581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lockshon D., Morris D. R. Positively supercoiled plasmid DNA is produced by treatment of Escherichia coli with DNA gyrase inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 May 25;11(10):2999–3017. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.10.2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lodge J. K., Kazic T., Berg D. E. Formation of supercoiling domains in plasmid pBR322. J Bacteriol. 1989 Apr;171(4):2181–2187. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.4.2181-2187.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynch A. S., Wang J. C. Anchoring of DNA to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane through cotranscriptional synthesis of polypeptides encoding membrane proteins or proteins for export: a mechanism of plasmid hypernegative supercoiling in mutants deficient in DNA topoisomerase I. J Bacteriol. 1993 Mar;175(6):1645–1655. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.6.1645-1655.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma D., Cook D. N., Pon N. G., Hearst J. E. Efficient anchoring of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli during coupled transcription-translation of genes encoding integral inner membrane polypeptides. J Biol Chem. 1994 May 27;269(21):15362–15370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Osborne B. I., Guarente L. Transcription by RNA polymerase II induces changes of DNA topology in yeast. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):766–772. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ostrander E. A., Benedetti P., Wang J. C. Template supercoiling by a chimera of yeast GAL4 protein and phage T7 RNA polymerase. Science. 1990 Sep 14;249(4974):1261–1265. doi: 10.1126/science.2399463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pruss G. J. DNA topoisomerase I mutants. Increased heterogeneity in linking number and other replicon-dependent changes in DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1985 Sep 5;185(1):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90182-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pruss G. J., Drlica K. Topoisomerase I mutants: the gene on pBR322 that encodes resistance to tetracycline affects plasmid DNA supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8952–8956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rahmouni A. R., Wells R. D. Direct evidence for the effect of transcription on local DNA supercoiling in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jan 5;223(1):131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90721-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rahmouni A. R., Wells R. D. Stabilization of Z DNA in vivo by localized supercoiling. Science. 1989 Oct 20;246(4928):358–363. doi: 10.1126/science.2678475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spirito F., Figueroa-Bossi N., Bossi L. The relative contributions of transcription and translation to plasmid DNA supercoiling in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):111–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tan J., Shu L., Wu H. Y. Activation of the leu-500 promoter by adjacent transcription. J Bacteriol. 1994 Feb;176(4):1077–1086. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.4.1077-1086.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsao Y. P., Wu H. Y., Liu L. F. Transcription-driven supercoiling of DNA: direct biochemical evidence from in vitro studies. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang J. C., Jacobsen J. H., Saucier J. M. Physiochemical studies on interactions between DNA and RNA polymerase. Unwinding of the DNA helix by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977;4(5):1225–1241. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.5.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu H. Y., Shyy S. H., Wang J. C., Liu L. F. Transcription generates positively and negatively supercoiled domains in the template. Cell. 1988 May 6;53(3):433–440. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zacharias W., Jaworski A., Larson J. E., Wells R. D. The B- to Z-DNA equilibrium in vivo is perturbed by biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(19):7069–7073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. ten Heggeler-Bordier B., Wahli W., Adrian M., Stasiak A., Dubochet J. The apical localization of transcribing RNA polymerases on supercoiled DNA prevents their rotation around the template. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):667–672. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05098.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES