Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Apr;151(4):1559–1568. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1559

Suppression of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells by small degrees of sequence divergence.

T Lukacsovich 1, A S Waldman 1
PMCID: PMC1460558  PMID: 10101177

Abstract

Pairs of closely linked defective herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase (tk) gene sequences exhibiting various nucleotide heterologies were introduced into the genome of mouse Ltk- cells. Recombination events were recovered by selecting for the correction of a 16-bp insertion mutation in one of the tk sequences. We had previously shown that when two tk sequences shared a region of 232 bp of homology, interruption of the homology by two single nucleotide heterologies placed 19 bp apart reduced recombination nearly 20-fold. We now report that either one of the nucleotide heterologies alone reduces recombination only about 2.5-fold, indicating that the original pair of single nucleotide heterologies acted synergistically to inhibit recombination. We tested a variety of pairs of single nucleotide heterologies and determined that they reduced recombination from 7- to 175-fold. Substrates potentially leading to G-G or C-C mispairs in presumptive heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) intermediates displayed a particularly low rate of recombination. Additional experiments suggested that increased sequence divergence causes a shortening of gene conversion tracts. Collectively, our results suggest that suppression of recombination between diverged sequences is mediated via processing of a mispaired hDNA intermediate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):19–39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bill C. A., Duran W. A., Miselis N. R., Nickoloff J. A. Efficient repair of all types of single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition between long-patch and G-T glycosylase-mediated repair of G-T mismatches. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1935–1943. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1459–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.2820060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borts R. H., Leung W. Y., Kramer W., Kramer B., Williamson M., Fogel S., Haber J. E. Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):573–584. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown T. C., Jiricny J. Different base/base mispairs are corrected with different efficiencies and specificities in monkey kidney cells. Cell. 1988 Aug 26;54(5):705–711. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Capecchi M. R. High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):479–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90358-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dohet C., Dzidić S., Wagner R., Radman M. Large non-homology in heteroduplex DNA is processed differently than single base pair mismatches. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Jan;206(1):181–184. doi: 10.1007/BF00326556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris S., Rudnicki K. S., Haber J. E. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kitts P. A., Nash H. A. Homology-dependent interactions in phage lambda site-specific recombination. Nature. 1987 Sep 24;329(6137):346–348. doi: 10.1038/329346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Letsou A., Liskay R. M. Effect of the molecular nature of mutation on the efficiency of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mouse cells. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):759–769. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liskay R. M., Letsou A., Stachelek J. L. Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):161–167. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L. Information transfer between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells involves contiguous regions of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1802–1806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L., Letsou A. Homologous recombination between repeated chromosomal sequences in mouse cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:183–189. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lukacsovich T., Yang D., Waldman A. S. Repair of a specific double-strand break generated within a mammalian chromosome by yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25;22(25):5649–5657. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Modrich P., Lahue R. Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:101–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Negritto M. T., Wu X., Kuo T., Chu S., Bailis A. M. Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):278–286. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parker B. O., Marinus M. G. Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1730–1734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubnitz J., Subramani S. The minimum amount of homology required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;4(11):2253–2258. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.11.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shen P., Huang H. V. Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Aug;218(2):358–360. doi: 10.1007/BF00331291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shen P., Huang H. V. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sia E. A., Kokoska R. J., Dominska M., Greenwell P., Petes T. D. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2851–2858. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Southern P. J., Berg P. Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J Mol Appl Genet. 1982;1(4):327–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stambuk S., Radman M. Mechanism and control of interspecies recombination in Escherichia coli. I. Mismatch repair, methylation, recombination and replication functions. Genetics. 1998 Oct;150(2):533–542. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Taghian D. G., Hough H., Nickoloff J. A. Biased short tract repair of palindromic loop mismatches in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1257–1268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tran H. T., Gordenin D. A., Resnick M. A. The prevention of repeat-associated deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mismatch repair depends on size and origin of deletions. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1579–1587. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wagner M. J., Sharp J. A., Summers W. C. Nucleotide sequence of the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus type 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1441–1445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5350–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. de Wind N., Dekker M., Berns A., Radman M., te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES