Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Jun;152(2):775–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.775

Overdominant alleles in a population of variable size.

M Slatkin 1, C A Muirhead 1
PMCID: PMC1460632  PMID: 10353917

Abstract

An approximate method is developed to predict the number of strongly overdominant alleles in a population of which the size varies with time. The approximation relies on the strong-selection weak-mutation (SSWM) method introduced by J. H. Gillespie and leads to a Markov chain model that describes the number of common alleles in the population. The parameters of the transition matrix of the Markov chain depend in a simple way on the population size. For a population of constant size, the Markov chain leads to results that are nearly the same as those of N. Takahata. The Markov chain allows the prediction of the numbers of common alleles during and after a population bottleneck and the numbers of alleles surviving from before a bottleneck. This method is also adapted to modeling the case in which there are two classes of alleles, with one class causing a reduction in fitness relative to the other class. Very slight selection against one class can strongly affect the relative frequencies of the two classes and the relative ages of alleles in each class.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J. The myth of Eve: molecular biology and human origins. Science. 1995 Dec 22;270(5244):1930–1936. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Klein J., Takahata N., Ayala F. J. MHC polymorphism and human origins. Sci Am. 1993 Dec;269(6):78–83. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1293-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller K. M., Withler R. E., Beacham T. D. Molecular evolution at Mhc genes in two populations of chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Mol Ecol. 1997 Oct;6(10):937–954. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Satta Y. Effects of intra-locus recombination of HLA polymorphism. Hereditas. 1997;127(1-2):105–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1997.00105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Takahata N. A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2419–2423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vekemans X., Slatkin M. Gene and allelic genealogies at a gametophytic self-incompatibility locus. Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1157–1165. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.4.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wenink P. W., Groen A. F., Roelke-Parker M. E., Prins H. H. African buffalo maintain high genetic diversity in the major histocompatibility complex in spite of historically known population bottlenecks. Mol Ecol. 1998 Oct;7(10):1315–1322. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wright S. The Distribution of Self-Sterility Alleles in Populations. Genetics. 1939 Jun;24(4):538–552. doi: 10.1093/genetics/24.4.538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES