Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Jun;152(2):713–727. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.713

Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

L H Rieseberg 1, J Whitton 1, K Gardner 1
PMCID: PMC1460641  PMID: 10353912

Abstract

Genetic analyses of reproductive barriers represent one of the few methods by which theories of speciation can be tested. However, genetic study is often restricted to model organisms that have short generation times and are easily propagated in the laboratory. Replicate hybrid zones with a diversity of recombinant genotypes of varying age offer increased resolution for genetic mapping experiments and expand the pool of organisms amenable to genetic study. Using 88 markers distributed across 17 chromosomes, we analyze the introgression of chromosomal segments of Helianthus petiolaris into H. annuus in three natural hybrid zones. Introgression was significantly reduced relative to neutral expectations for 26 chromosomal segments, suggesting that each segment contains one or more factors that contribute to isolation. Pollen sterility is significantly associated with 16 of these 26 segments, providing a straightforward explanation of why this subset of blocks is disadvantageous in hybrids. In addition, comparison of rates of introgression across colinear vs. rearranged chromosomes indicates that close to 50% of the barrier to introgression is due to chromosomal rearrangements. These results demonstrate the utility of hybrid zones for identifying factors contributing to isolation and verify the prediction of increased resolution relative to controlled crosses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (490.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradshaw H. D., Jr, Otto K. G., Frewen B. E., McKay J. K., Schemske D. W. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):367–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coyne J. A., Meyers W., Crittenden A. P., Sniegowski P. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A., Orr H. A. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):287–305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis A. W., Wu C. I. The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1287–1298. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunt W. G., Selander R. K. Biochemical genetics of hybridisation in European house mice. Heredity (Edinb) 1973 Aug;31(1):11–33. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1973.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Orr H. A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1805–1813. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Palopoli M. F., Wu C. I. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):329–341. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Parsons T. J., Olson S. L., Braun M. J. Unidirectional spread of secondary sexual plumage traits across an avian hybrid zone. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1643–1646. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5114.1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rieseberg L. H., Linder C. R., Seiler G. J. Chromosomal and genic barriers to introgression in Helianthus. Genetics. 1995 Nov;141(3):1163–1171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.3.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rieseberg LH, Sinervo B, Linder CR, Ungerer MC, Arias DM. Role of Gene Interactions in Hybrid Speciation: Evidence from Ancient and Experimental Hybrids. Science. 1996 May 3;272(5262):741–745. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5262.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. True J. R., Weir B. S., Laurie C. C. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):819–837. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ungerer M. C., Baird S. J., Pan J., Rieseberg L. H. Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):11757–11762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitkus R., Doebley J., Lee M. Comparative genome mapping of Sorghum and maize. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1119–1130. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams J. G., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A., Tingey S. V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531–6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES